Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?Research in context

Background: The therapeutic potential of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is under investigation for a range of inflammatory conditions. While mechanisms of benefit are poorly understood, most models rely on the viability of transplanted microbes. We hypothesised that protocols commonly used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lito E. Papanicolas, Jocelyn M. Choo, Yanan Wang, Lex E.X. Leong, Samuel P. Costello, David L. Gordon, Steve L. Wesselingh, Geraint B. Rogers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-03-01
Series:EBioMedicine
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396419300957
id doaj-310fea08d9594ddda51493b9564d87ee
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lito E. Papanicolas
Jocelyn M. Choo
Yanan Wang
Lex E.X. Leong
Samuel P. Costello
David L. Gordon
Steve L. Wesselingh
Geraint B. Rogers
spellingShingle Lito E. Papanicolas
Jocelyn M. Choo
Yanan Wang
Lex E.X. Leong
Samuel P. Costello
David L. Gordon
Steve L. Wesselingh
Geraint B. Rogers
Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?Research in context
EBioMedicine
author_facet Lito E. Papanicolas
Jocelyn M. Choo
Yanan Wang
Lex E.X. Leong
Samuel P. Costello
David L. Gordon
Steve L. Wesselingh
Geraint B. Rogers
author_sort Lito E. Papanicolas
title Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?Research in context
title_short Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?Research in context
title_full Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?Research in context
title_fullStr Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?Research in context
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?Research in context
title_sort bacterial viability in faecal transplants: which bacteria survive?research in context
publisher Elsevier
series EBioMedicine
issn 2352-3964
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Background: The therapeutic potential of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is under investigation for a range of inflammatory conditions. While mechanisms of benefit are poorly understood, most models rely on the viability of transplanted microbes. We hypothesised that protocols commonly used in the preparation of faecal transplants will substantially reduce the number, diversity and functional potential of viable microbes. Methods: Stools from eight screened donors were processed under strict anaerobic conditions, in ambient air, and freeze-thawed. Propidium monoazide (PMA) sample treatment was combined with quantitative PCR, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) analysis to define the viable microbiota composition and functional potential. Findings: Approximately 50% of bacterial content of stool processed immediately under strict anaerobic conditions was non-viable. Homogenisation in ambient air or freeze-thaw reduced viability to 19% and 23% respectively. Processing of samples in ambient air resulted in up to 12-fold reductions in the abundance of important commensal taxa, including the highly butyrogenic species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Subdoligranulum variable, and Eubacterium hallii. The adverse impact of atmospheric oxygen exposure on the capacity of the transplanted microbiota to support SCFA biosynthesis was demonstrated by significantly reduced butyrate and acetate production by faecal slurries processed in ambient air. In contrast, while reducing overall levels of viable bacteria, freeze-thaw did not significantly alter viable microbiota composition. Interpretation: The practice of preparing material for faecal transplantation in ambient air profoundly affects viable microbial content, disproportionately reducing the abundance of anaerobic commensals and the capacity for biosynthesis of important anti-inflammatory metabolites. Fund: This work was supported by the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute. LP is supported by a scholarship from the Flinders Foundation. GR is supported by a Matthew Flinders Research Fellowship. Keywords: Bacterial viability, Fecal microbiota transplantation, qPCR, Propidium monoazide
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396419300957
work_keys_str_mv AT litoepapanicolas bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurviveresearchincontext
AT jocelynmchoo bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurviveresearchincontext
AT yananwang bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurviveresearchincontext
AT lexexleong bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurviveresearchincontext
AT samuelpcostello bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurviveresearchincontext
AT davidlgordon bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurviveresearchincontext
AT stevelwesselingh bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurviveresearchincontext
AT geraintbrogers bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurviveresearchincontext
_version_ 1725889951381323776
spelling doaj-310fea08d9594ddda51493b9564d87ee2020-11-24T21:49:01ZengElsevierEBioMedicine2352-39642019-03-0141509516Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?Research in contextLito E. Papanicolas0Jocelyn M. Choo1Yanan Wang2Lex E.X. Leong3Samuel P. Costello4David L. Gordon5Steve L. Wesselingh6Geraint B. Rogers7The South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; The SAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Corresponding author at: The SAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.The South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; The SAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, AustraliaThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; The SAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, AustraliaThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; The SAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, AustraliaThe University of Adelaide at the Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, AustraliaThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; The SAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, AustraliaThe South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; The SAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, AustraliaBackground: The therapeutic potential of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is under investigation for a range of inflammatory conditions. While mechanisms of benefit are poorly understood, most models rely on the viability of transplanted microbes. We hypothesised that protocols commonly used in the preparation of faecal transplants will substantially reduce the number, diversity and functional potential of viable microbes. Methods: Stools from eight screened donors were processed under strict anaerobic conditions, in ambient air, and freeze-thawed. Propidium monoazide (PMA) sample treatment was combined with quantitative PCR, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) analysis to define the viable microbiota composition and functional potential. Findings: Approximately 50% of bacterial content of stool processed immediately under strict anaerobic conditions was non-viable. Homogenisation in ambient air or freeze-thaw reduced viability to 19% and 23% respectively. Processing of samples in ambient air resulted in up to 12-fold reductions in the abundance of important commensal taxa, including the highly butyrogenic species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Subdoligranulum variable, and Eubacterium hallii. The adverse impact of atmospheric oxygen exposure on the capacity of the transplanted microbiota to support SCFA biosynthesis was demonstrated by significantly reduced butyrate and acetate production by faecal slurries processed in ambient air. In contrast, while reducing overall levels of viable bacteria, freeze-thaw did not significantly alter viable microbiota composition. Interpretation: The practice of preparing material for faecal transplantation in ambient air profoundly affects viable microbial content, disproportionately reducing the abundance of anaerobic commensals and the capacity for biosynthesis of important anti-inflammatory metabolites. Fund: This work was supported by the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute. LP is supported by a scholarship from the Flinders Foundation. GR is supported by a Matthew Flinders Research Fellowship. Keywords: Bacterial viability, Fecal microbiota transplantation, qPCR, Propidium monoazidehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396419300957