An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments

In order to identify the most effective variants for reducing flood risk in cities and to provide protection for water resources, an in-depth study was carried out. The research results allowed for the identification of sustainable drainage infrastructure solutions that should be used to increase th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariusz Starzec, Józef Dziopak, Daniel Słyś
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-02-01
Series:Resources
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/2/19
id doaj-31021107fc6c48f69fe96b8602247ec1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31021107fc6c48f69fe96b8602247ec12020-11-25T01:41:39ZengMDPI AGResources2079-92762020-02-01921910.3390/resources9020019resources9020019An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban CatchmentsMariusz Starzec0Józef Dziopak1Daniel Słyś2Department of Infrastructure and Water Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 6, 35-959 Rzeszow, PolandDepartment of Infrastructure and Water Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 6, 35-959 Rzeszow, PolandDepartment of Infrastructure and Water Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 6, 35-959 Rzeszow, PolandIn order to identify the most effective variants for reducing flood risk in cities and to provide protection for water resources, an in-depth study was carried out. The research results allowed for the identification of sustainable drainage infrastructure solutions that should be used to increase the efficiency of traditional drainage systems. The most effective solution turned out to be the simultaneous use of low impact development facilities and stormwater flow control devices in drainage systems (Variant IV). Applicationof this variant (maximum discharge <i>QOmax</i> = 246.39 dm<sup>3</sup>/s) allowed for the reduction of the peak flow by as much as 86% in relation to those values that were established in the traditional drainage system (maximum discharge <i>QOmax</i> = 1807.62 dm<sup>3</sup>/s). The use of Variant IV allowed for a combination of the advantages of low impact development (LID) facilities and stormwater flow control devices in drainage systems while limiting their disadvantages. In practice, the flow of rainwater from the catchment area to the drainage system was limited, the share of green areas increased, and the drainage system retention capacity grew. The proposed approach for reducing the increasing flood risk in cities and providing protection for water resources provides a structured approach to long-term urban drainage system planning and land use guidelines.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/2/19stormwater managementretention sewage canalsustainable drainage systemsurban floodsmanagement of water resourcesclimate change
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariusz Starzec
Józef Dziopak
Daniel Słyś
spellingShingle Mariusz Starzec
Józef Dziopak
Daniel Słyś
An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments
Resources
stormwater management
retention sewage canal
sustainable drainage systems
urban floods
management of water resources
climate change
author_facet Mariusz Starzec
Józef Dziopak
Daniel Słyś
author_sort Mariusz Starzec
title An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments
title_short An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments
title_full An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments
title_fullStr An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments
title_sort analysis of stormwater management variants in urban catchments
publisher MDPI AG
series Resources
issn 2079-9276
publishDate 2020-02-01
description In order to identify the most effective variants for reducing flood risk in cities and to provide protection for water resources, an in-depth study was carried out. The research results allowed for the identification of sustainable drainage infrastructure solutions that should be used to increase the efficiency of traditional drainage systems. The most effective solution turned out to be the simultaneous use of low impact development facilities and stormwater flow control devices in drainage systems (Variant IV). Applicationof this variant (maximum discharge <i>QOmax</i> = 246.39 dm<sup>3</sup>/s) allowed for the reduction of the peak flow by as much as 86% in relation to those values that were established in the traditional drainage system (maximum discharge <i>QOmax</i> = 1807.62 dm<sup>3</sup>/s). The use of Variant IV allowed for a combination of the advantages of low impact development (LID) facilities and stormwater flow control devices in drainage systems while limiting their disadvantages. In practice, the flow of rainwater from the catchment area to the drainage system was limited, the share of green areas increased, and the drainage system retention capacity grew. The proposed approach for reducing the increasing flood risk in cities and providing protection for water resources provides a structured approach to long-term urban drainage system planning and land use guidelines.
topic stormwater management
retention sewage canal
sustainable drainage systems
urban floods
management of water resources
climate change
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/2/19
work_keys_str_mv AT mariuszstarzec ananalysisofstormwatermanagementvariantsinurbancatchments
AT jozefdziopak ananalysisofstormwatermanagementvariantsinurbancatchments
AT danielsłys ananalysisofstormwatermanagementvariantsinurbancatchments
AT mariuszstarzec analysisofstormwatermanagementvariantsinurbancatchments
AT jozefdziopak analysisofstormwatermanagementvariantsinurbancatchments
AT danielsłys analysisofstormwatermanagementvariantsinurbancatchments
_version_ 1725040433521754112