An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments
In order to identify the most effective variants for reducing flood risk in cities and to provide protection for water resources, an in-depth study was carried out. The research results allowed for the identification of sustainable drainage infrastructure solutions that should be used to increase th...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Resources |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/2/19 |
id |
doaj-31021107fc6c48f69fe96b8602247ec1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-31021107fc6c48f69fe96b8602247ec12020-11-25T01:41:39ZengMDPI AGResources2079-92762020-02-01921910.3390/resources9020019resources9020019An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban CatchmentsMariusz Starzec0Józef Dziopak1Daniel Słyś2Department of Infrastructure and Water Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 6, 35-959 Rzeszow, PolandDepartment of Infrastructure and Water Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 6, 35-959 Rzeszow, PolandDepartment of Infrastructure and Water Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 6, 35-959 Rzeszow, PolandIn order to identify the most effective variants for reducing flood risk in cities and to provide protection for water resources, an in-depth study was carried out. The research results allowed for the identification of sustainable drainage infrastructure solutions that should be used to increase the efficiency of traditional drainage systems. The most effective solution turned out to be the simultaneous use of low impact development facilities and stormwater flow control devices in drainage systems (Variant IV). Applicationof this variant (maximum discharge <i>QOmax</i> = 246.39 dm<sup>3</sup>/s) allowed for the reduction of the peak flow by as much as 86% in relation to those values that were established in the traditional drainage system (maximum discharge <i>QOmax</i> = 1807.62 dm<sup>3</sup>/s). The use of Variant IV allowed for a combination of the advantages of low impact development (LID) facilities and stormwater flow control devices in drainage systems while limiting their disadvantages. In practice, the flow of rainwater from the catchment area to the drainage system was limited, the share of green areas increased, and the drainage system retention capacity grew. The proposed approach for reducing the increasing flood risk in cities and providing protection for water resources provides a structured approach to long-term urban drainage system planning and land use guidelines.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/2/19stormwater managementretention sewage canalsustainable drainage systemsurban floodsmanagement of water resourcesclimate change |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mariusz Starzec Józef Dziopak Daniel Słyś |
spellingShingle |
Mariusz Starzec Józef Dziopak Daniel Słyś An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments Resources stormwater management retention sewage canal sustainable drainage systems urban floods management of water resources climate change |
author_facet |
Mariusz Starzec Józef Dziopak Daniel Słyś |
author_sort |
Mariusz Starzec |
title |
An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments |
title_short |
An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments |
title_full |
An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments |
title_fullStr |
An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments |
title_sort |
analysis of stormwater management variants in urban catchments |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Resources |
issn |
2079-9276 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
In order to identify the most effective variants for reducing flood risk in cities and to provide protection for water resources, an in-depth study was carried out. The research results allowed for the identification of sustainable drainage infrastructure solutions that should be used to increase the efficiency of traditional drainage systems. The most effective solution turned out to be the simultaneous use of low impact development facilities and stormwater flow control devices in drainage systems (Variant IV). Applicationof this variant (maximum discharge <i>QOmax</i> = 246.39 dm<sup>3</sup>/s) allowed for the reduction of the peak flow by as much as 86% in relation to those values that were established in the traditional drainage system (maximum discharge <i>QOmax</i> = 1807.62 dm<sup>3</sup>/s). The use of Variant IV allowed for a combination of the advantages of low impact development (LID) facilities and stormwater flow control devices in drainage systems while limiting their disadvantages. In practice, the flow of rainwater from the catchment area to the drainage system was limited, the share of green areas increased, and the drainage system retention capacity grew. The proposed approach for reducing the increasing flood risk in cities and providing protection for water resources provides a structured approach to long-term urban drainage system planning and land use guidelines. |
topic |
stormwater management retention sewage canal sustainable drainage systems urban floods management of water resources climate change |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/2/19 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariuszstarzec ananalysisofstormwatermanagementvariantsinurbancatchments AT jozefdziopak ananalysisofstormwatermanagementvariantsinurbancatchments AT danielsłys ananalysisofstormwatermanagementvariantsinurbancatchments AT mariuszstarzec analysisofstormwatermanagementvariantsinurbancatchments AT jozefdziopak analysisofstormwatermanagementvariantsinurbancatchments AT danielsłys analysisofstormwatermanagementvariantsinurbancatchments |
_version_ |
1725040433521754112 |