Convex optimization using quantum oracles
We study to what extent quantum algorithms can speed up solving convex optimization problems. Following the classical literature we assume access to a convex set via various oracles, and we examine the efficiency of reductions between the different oracles. In particular, we show how a separation or...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Quantum |
Online Access: | https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2020-01-13-220/pdf/ |
id |
doaj-30ec1102055440a7a5c347521664fb6f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-30ec1102055440a7a5c347521664fb6f2020-11-24T21:43:11ZengVerein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den QuantenwissenschaftenQuantum2521-327X2020-01-01422010.22331/q-2020-01-13-22010.22331/q-2020-01-13-220Convex optimization using quantum oraclesJoran van ApeldoornAndrás GilyénSander GriblingRonald de WolfWe study to what extent quantum algorithms can speed up solving convex optimization problems. Following the classical literature we assume access to a convex set via various oracles, and we examine the efficiency of reductions between the different oracles. In particular, we show how a separation oracle can be implemented using $\tilde{O}(1)$ quantum queries to a membership oracle, which is an exponential quantum speed-up over the $\Omega(n)$ membership queries that are needed classically. We show that a quantum computer can very efficiently compute an approximate subgradient of a convex Lipschitz function. Combining this with a simplification of recent classical work of Lee, Sidford, and Vempala gives our efficient separation oracle. This in turn implies, via a known algorithm, that $\tilde{O}(n)$ quantum queries to a membership oracle suffice to implement an optimization oracle (the best known classical upper bound on the number of membership queries is quadratic). We also prove several lower bounds: $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ quantum separation (or membership) queries are needed for optimization if the algorithm knows an interior point of the convex set, and $\Omega(n)$ quantum separation queries are needed if it does not.https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2020-01-13-220/pdf/ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Joran van Apeldoorn András Gilyén Sander Gribling Ronald de Wolf |
spellingShingle |
Joran van Apeldoorn András Gilyén Sander Gribling Ronald de Wolf Convex optimization using quantum oracles Quantum |
author_facet |
Joran van Apeldoorn András Gilyén Sander Gribling Ronald de Wolf |
author_sort |
Joran van Apeldoorn |
title |
Convex optimization using quantum oracles |
title_short |
Convex optimization using quantum oracles |
title_full |
Convex optimization using quantum oracles |
title_fullStr |
Convex optimization using quantum oracles |
title_full_unstemmed |
Convex optimization using quantum oracles |
title_sort |
convex optimization using quantum oracles |
publisher |
Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften |
series |
Quantum |
issn |
2521-327X |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
We study to what extent quantum algorithms can speed up solving convex optimization problems. Following the classical literature we assume access to a convex set via various oracles, and we examine the efficiency of reductions between the different oracles. In particular, we show how a separation oracle can be implemented using $\tilde{O}(1)$ quantum queries to a membership oracle, which is an exponential quantum speed-up over the $\Omega(n)$ membership queries that are needed classically. We show that a quantum computer can very efficiently compute an approximate subgradient of a convex Lipschitz function. Combining this with a simplification of recent classical work of Lee, Sidford, and Vempala gives our efficient separation oracle. This in turn implies, via a known algorithm, that $\tilde{O}(n)$ quantum queries to a membership oracle suffice to implement an optimization oracle (the best known classical upper bound on the number of membership queries is quadratic). We also prove several lower bounds: $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ quantum separation (or membership) queries are needed for optimization if the algorithm knows an interior point of the convex set, and $\Omega(n)$ quantum separation queries are needed if it does not. |
url |
https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2020-01-13-220/pdf/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT joranvanapeldoorn convexoptimizationusingquantumoracles AT andrasgilyen convexoptimizationusingquantumoracles AT sandergribling convexoptimizationusingquantumoracles AT ronalddewolf convexoptimizationusingquantumoracles |
_version_ |
1725915161137512448 |