A Re-examination of Online Journal Quality and Investigation of the Possible Impact of Poor Electronic Surrogate Quality on Researchers
Objective – This study re-examines the findings of a paper (Ladd, 2010) that investigated whether evidence indicated print equivalent journal collections needed to be preserved, based on the quality of their electronic surrogates. The current study investigates whether: 1) electronic surrogate arti...
Main Author: | Ken Ladd |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Alberta
2018-08-01
|
Series: | Evidence Based Library and Information Practice |
Online Access: | https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/29449 |
Similar Items
-
An Examination of the Failure Rate and Content Equivalency of Electronic Surrogates and the Implications for Print Equivalent Preservation
by: Ken Ladd
Published: (2010-12-01) -
An Examination of the Failure Rate and Content Equivalency of Electronic Surrogates and the Implications for Print Equivalent Preservation
by: Ken Ladd
Published: (2010-12-01) -
New methods for the examination of poor quality medicines
by: Hostetler, Dana M.
Published: (2012) -
Online Journals: the Path Towards Visibility and Quality
by: Julie Walker
Published: (2010-02-01) -
Method for quality assurance of mine-surrogates
by: Forsman, Niclas
Published: (2014)