Variation in Carbon Fraction, Density, and Carbon Density in Conifer Tree Tissues
We analyzed variations in three tree properties: tissue density, carbon fraction, and carbon density within bole tissues of nine Californian conifer species. Model performance for all three tree properties was significantly improved with the addition of covariates related to crown characteristics an...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Forests |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/7/430 |
id |
doaj-30e127206f964cd4bbbfe3b0266e1ed1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-30e127206f964cd4bbbfe3b0266e1ed12020-11-24T21:32:23ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072018-07-019743010.3390/f9070430f9070430Variation in Carbon Fraction, Density, and Carbon Density in Conifer Tree TissuesDryw A. Jones0Kevin L. O’Hara1USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, 93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512, USAUniversity of California at Berkeley, 140 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA 94705-3114, USAWe analyzed variations in three tree properties: tissue density, carbon fraction, and carbon density within bole tissues of nine Californian conifer species. Model performance for all three tree properties was significantly improved with the addition of covariates related to crown characteristics and position within the tree. This suggests that biomass and carbon mass estimates that rely on fixed wood density and carbon fraction may be inaccurate across tree sizes. We found a significant negative relationship between tissue density and carbon fraction within tree bole tissues, indicating that multiplying biomass by an average carbon fraction to obtain carbon mass is likely to lead to inaccurate estimates. Measured carbon fractions in tree tissues deviated from the widely used 0.5 value from a low of 1.4% to a high of 17.6%. Carbon fraction model parameters indicate the potential for an additional deviation from this 0.5 value of up to 2.7% due to the interaction between relative height and wood density. Applying measured carbon fractions to whole bole biomasses resulted in carbon mass estimates as much as 10.6% greater than estimates derived using the 0.5 value. We also found a significant, though modest, improvement in carbon fraction model estimates by assigning trees to groups based on tree bark characteristics.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/7/430carbon fractiontissue densityconifer carbon mass estimationmixed-effects model |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dryw A. Jones Kevin L. O’Hara |
spellingShingle |
Dryw A. Jones Kevin L. O’Hara Variation in Carbon Fraction, Density, and Carbon Density in Conifer Tree Tissues Forests carbon fraction tissue density conifer carbon mass estimation mixed-effects model |
author_facet |
Dryw A. Jones Kevin L. O’Hara |
author_sort |
Dryw A. Jones |
title |
Variation in Carbon Fraction, Density, and Carbon Density in Conifer Tree Tissues |
title_short |
Variation in Carbon Fraction, Density, and Carbon Density in Conifer Tree Tissues |
title_full |
Variation in Carbon Fraction, Density, and Carbon Density in Conifer Tree Tissues |
title_fullStr |
Variation in Carbon Fraction, Density, and Carbon Density in Conifer Tree Tissues |
title_full_unstemmed |
Variation in Carbon Fraction, Density, and Carbon Density in Conifer Tree Tissues |
title_sort |
variation in carbon fraction, density, and carbon density in conifer tree tissues |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Forests |
issn |
1999-4907 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
We analyzed variations in three tree properties: tissue density, carbon fraction, and carbon density within bole tissues of nine Californian conifer species. Model performance for all three tree properties was significantly improved with the addition of covariates related to crown characteristics and position within the tree. This suggests that biomass and carbon mass estimates that rely on fixed wood density and carbon fraction may be inaccurate across tree sizes. We found a significant negative relationship between tissue density and carbon fraction within tree bole tissues, indicating that multiplying biomass by an average carbon fraction to obtain carbon mass is likely to lead to inaccurate estimates. Measured carbon fractions in tree tissues deviated from the widely used 0.5 value from a low of 1.4% to a high of 17.6%. Carbon fraction model parameters indicate the potential for an additional deviation from this 0.5 value of up to 2.7% due to the interaction between relative height and wood density. Applying measured carbon fractions to whole bole biomasses resulted in carbon mass estimates as much as 10.6% greater than estimates derived using the 0.5 value. We also found a significant, though modest, improvement in carbon fraction model estimates by assigning trees to groups based on tree bark characteristics. |
topic |
carbon fraction tissue density conifer carbon mass estimation mixed-effects model |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/7/430 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT drywajones variationincarbonfractiondensityandcarbondensityinconifertreetissues AT kevinlohara variationincarbonfractiondensityandcarbondensityinconifertreetissues |
_version_ |
1725957810154373120 |