Anticonvulsant vs. Proconvulsant Effect of in situ Deep Brain Stimulation at the Epileptogenic Focus

Since deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the epileptogenic focus (in situ) denotes long-term repetitive stimulation of the potentially epileptogenic structures, such as the amygdala, the hippocampus, and the cerebral cortex, a kindling effect and aggravation of seizures may happen and complicate the cl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ping Chou, Chung-Chin Kuo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2021.607450/full
id doaj-30daaf64e10243918228aea4779c8bc3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-30daaf64e10243918228aea4779c8bc32021-08-02T08:56:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience1662-51372021-08-011510.3389/fnsys.2021.607450607450Anticonvulsant vs. Proconvulsant Effect of in situ Deep Brain Stimulation at the Epileptogenic FocusPing Chou0Chung-Chin Kuo1Chung-Chin Kuo2Institute of Physiology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, TaiwanInstitute of Physiology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanSince deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the epileptogenic focus (in situ) denotes long-term repetitive stimulation of the potentially epileptogenic structures, such as the amygdala, the hippocampus, and the cerebral cortex, a kindling effect and aggravation of seizures may happen and complicate the clinical condition. It is, thus, highly desirable to work out a protocol with an evident quenching (anticonvulsant) effect but free of concomitant proconvulsant side effects. We found that in the basolateral amygdala (BLA), an extremely wide range of pulsatile stimulation protocols eventually leads to the kindling effect. Only protocols with a pulse frequency of ≤1 Hz or a direct current (DC), with all of the other parameters unchanged, could never kindle the animal. On the other hand, the aforementioned DC stimulation (DCS), even a pulse as short as 10 s given 5 min before the kindling stimuli or a pulse given even to the contralateral BLA, is very effective against epileptogenicity and ictogenicity. Behavioral, electrophysiological, and histological findings consistently demonstrate success in seizure quenching or suppression as well as in the safety of the specific DBS protocol (e.g., no apparent brain damage by repeated sessions of stimulation applied to the BLA for 1 month). We conclude that in situ DCS, with a novel and rational design of the stimulation protocol composed of a very low (∼3% or 10 s/5 min) duty cycle and assuredly devoid of the potential of kindling, may make a successful antiepileptic therapy with adequate safety in terms of little epileptogenic adverse events and tissue damage.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2021.607450/fullin situ DBSdirect current (DC)kindlingseizure focusmirror focus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ping Chou
Chung-Chin Kuo
Chung-Chin Kuo
spellingShingle Ping Chou
Chung-Chin Kuo
Chung-Chin Kuo
Anticonvulsant vs. Proconvulsant Effect of in situ Deep Brain Stimulation at the Epileptogenic Focus
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
in situ DBS
direct current (DC)
kindling
seizure focus
mirror focus
author_facet Ping Chou
Chung-Chin Kuo
Chung-Chin Kuo
author_sort Ping Chou
title Anticonvulsant vs. Proconvulsant Effect of in situ Deep Brain Stimulation at the Epileptogenic Focus
title_short Anticonvulsant vs. Proconvulsant Effect of in situ Deep Brain Stimulation at the Epileptogenic Focus
title_full Anticonvulsant vs. Proconvulsant Effect of in situ Deep Brain Stimulation at the Epileptogenic Focus
title_fullStr Anticonvulsant vs. Proconvulsant Effect of in situ Deep Brain Stimulation at the Epileptogenic Focus
title_full_unstemmed Anticonvulsant vs. Proconvulsant Effect of in situ Deep Brain Stimulation at the Epileptogenic Focus
title_sort anticonvulsant vs. proconvulsant effect of in situ deep brain stimulation at the epileptogenic focus
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
issn 1662-5137
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Since deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the epileptogenic focus (in situ) denotes long-term repetitive stimulation of the potentially epileptogenic structures, such as the amygdala, the hippocampus, and the cerebral cortex, a kindling effect and aggravation of seizures may happen and complicate the clinical condition. It is, thus, highly desirable to work out a protocol with an evident quenching (anticonvulsant) effect but free of concomitant proconvulsant side effects. We found that in the basolateral amygdala (BLA), an extremely wide range of pulsatile stimulation protocols eventually leads to the kindling effect. Only protocols with a pulse frequency of ≤1 Hz or a direct current (DC), with all of the other parameters unchanged, could never kindle the animal. On the other hand, the aforementioned DC stimulation (DCS), even a pulse as short as 10 s given 5 min before the kindling stimuli or a pulse given even to the contralateral BLA, is very effective against epileptogenicity and ictogenicity. Behavioral, electrophysiological, and histological findings consistently demonstrate success in seizure quenching or suppression as well as in the safety of the specific DBS protocol (e.g., no apparent brain damage by repeated sessions of stimulation applied to the BLA for 1 month). We conclude that in situ DCS, with a novel and rational design of the stimulation protocol composed of a very low (∼3% or 10 s/5 min) duty cycle and assuredly devoid of the potential of kindling, may make a successful antiepileptic therapy with adequate safety in terms of little epileptogenic adverse events and tissue damage.
topic in situ DBS
direct current (DC)
kindling
seizure focus
mirror focus
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2021.607450/full
work_keys_str_mv AT pingchou anticonvulsantvsproconvulsanteffectofinsitudeepbrainstimulationattheepileptogenicfocus
AT chungchinkuo anticonvulsantvsproconvulsanteffectofinsitudeepbrainstimulationattheepileptogenicfocus
AT chungchinkuo anticonvulsantvsproconvulsanteffectofinsitudeepbrainstimulationattheepileptogenicfocus
_version_ 1721236704123158528