Hindsight is 2020 vision: a characterisation of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract Background The global impact of COVID-19 and the country-specific responses to the pandemic provide an unparalleled opportunity to learn about different patterns of the outbreak and interventions. We model the global pattern of reported COVID-19 cases during the primary response period, wit...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09972-z |
id |
doaj-30d7ed67ca23455c8b10c3f2a31ddb45 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-30d7ed67ca23455c8b10c3f2a31ddb452020-12-07T18:46:01ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582020-12-0120111410.1186/s12889-020-09972-zHindsight is 2020 vision: a characterisation of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemicDavid J. Warne0Anthony Ebert1Christopher Drovandi2Wenbiao Hu3Antonietta Mira4Kerrie Mengersen5School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of TechnologyInstitute of Computational Science, Università della Svizzera italianaSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of TechnologySchool of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of TechnologyInstitute of Computational Science, Università della Svizzera italianaSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of TechnologyAbstract Background The global impact of COVID-19 and the country-specific responses to the pandemic provide an unparalleled opportunity to learn about different patterns of the outbreak and interventions. We model the global pattern of reported COVID-19 cases during the primary response period, with the aim of learning from the past to prepare for the future. Methods Using Bayesian methods, we analyse the response to the COVID-19 outbreak for 158 countries for the period 22 January to 9 June 2020. This encompasses the period in which many countries imposed a variety of response measures and initial relaxation strategies. Instead of modelling specific intervention types and timings for each country explicitly, we adopt a stochastic epidemiological model including a feedback mechanism on virus transmission to capture complex nonlinear dynamics arising from continuous changes in community behaviour in response to rising case numbers. We analyse the overall effect of interventions and community responses across diverse regions. This approach mitigates explicit consideration of issues such as period of infectivity and public adherence to government restrictions. Results Countries with the largest cumulative case tallies are characterised by a delayed response, whereas countries that avoid substantial community transmission during the period of study responded quickly. Countries that recovered rapidly also have a higher case identification rate and small numbers of undocumented community transmission at the early stages of the outbreak. We also demonstrate that uncertainty in numbers of undocumented infections dramatically impacts the risk of multiple waves. Our approach is also effective at pre-empting potential flare-ups. Conclusions We demonstrate the utility of modelling to interpret community behaviour in the early epidemic stages. Two lessons learnt that are important for the future are: i) countries that imposed strict containment measures early in the epidemic fared better with respect to numbers of reported cases; and ii) broader testing is required early in the epidemic to understand the magnitude of undocumented infections and recover rapidly. We conclude that clear patterns of containment are essential prior to relaxation of restrictions and show that modelling can provide insights to this end.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09972-zSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Stochastic epidemiological modelsApproximate Bayesian computationSequential Monte Carlo |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
David J. Warne Anthony Ebert Christopher Drovandi Wenbiao Hu Antonietta Mira Kerrie Mengersen |
spellingShingle |
David J. Warne Anthony Ebert Christopher Drovandi Wenbiao Hu Antonietta Mira Kerrie Mengersen Hindsight is 2020 vision: a characterisation of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic BMC Public Health SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 Stochastic epidemiological models Approximate Bayesian computation Sequential Monte Carlo |
author_facet |
David J. Warne Anthony Ebert Christopher Drovandi Wenbiao Hu Antonietta Mira Kerrie Mengersen |
author_sort |
David J. Warne |
title |
Hindsight is 2020 vision: a characterisation of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short |
Hindsight is 2020 vision: a characterisation of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full |
Hindsight is 2020 vision: a characterisation of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr |
Hindsight is 2020 vision: a characterisation of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hindsight is 2020 vision: a characterisation of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort |
hindsight is 2020 vision: a characterisation of the global response to the covid-19 pandemic |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Public Health |
issn |
1471-2458 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The global impact of COVID-19 and the country-specific responses to the pandemic provide an unparalleled opportunity to learn about different patterns of the outbreak and interventions. We model the global pattern of reported COVID-19 cases during the primary response period, with the aim of learning from the past to prepare for the future. Methods Using Bayesian methods, we analyse the response to the COVID-19 outbreak for 158 countries for the period 22 January to 9 June 2020. This encompasses the period in which many countries imposed a variety of response measures and initial relaxation strategies. Instead of modelling specific intervention types and timings for each country explicitly, we adopt a stochastic epidemiological model including a feedback mechanism on virus transmission to capture complex nonlinear dynamics arising from continuous changes in community behaviour in response to rising case numbers. We analyse the overall effect of interventions and community responses across diverse regions. This approach mitigates explicit consideration of issues such as period of infectivity and public adherence to government restrictions. Results Countries with the largest cumulative case tallies are characterised by a delayed response, whereas countries that avoid substantial community transmission during the period of study responded quickly. Countries that recovered rapidly also have a higher case identification rate and small numbers of undocumented community transmission at the early stages of the outbreak. We also demonstrate that uncertainty in numbers of undocumented infections dramatically impacts the risk of multiple waves. Our approach is also effective at pre-empting potential flare-ups. Conclusions We demonstrate the utility of modelling to interpret community behaviour in the early epidemic stages. Two lessons learnt that are important for the future are: i) countries that imposed strict containment measures early in the epidemic fared better with respect to numbers of reported cases; and ii) broader testing is required early in the epidemic to understand the magnitude of undocumented infections and recover rapidly. We conclude that clear patterns of containment are essential prior to relaxation of restrictions and show that modelling can provide insights to this end. |
topic |
SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 Stochastic epidemiological models Approximate Bayesian computation Sequential Monte Carlo |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09972-z |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidjwarne hindsightis2020visionacharacterisationoftheglobalresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT anthonyebert hindsightis2020visionacharacterisationoftheglobalresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT christopherdrovandi hindsightis2020visionacharacterisationoftheglobalresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT wenbiaohu hindsightis2020visionacharacterisationoftheglobalresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT antoniettamira hindsightis2020visionacharacterisationoftheglobalresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT kerriemengersen hindsightis2020visionacharacterisationoftheglobalresponsetothecovid19pandemic |
_version_ |
1724397346924527616 |