Displacement Demand for Nonlinear Static Analyses of Masonry Structures: Critical Review and Improved Formulations

This paper discusses different formulations for calculating earthquake-induced displacement demands to be associated with nonlinear static analysis procedures for the assessment of masonry structures. Focus is placed on systems with fundamental periods between 0.1 and 0.5 s, for which the inelastic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriele Guerrini, Stylianos Kallioras, Stefano Bracchi, Francesco Graziotti, Andrea Penna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/11/3/118
id doaj-30cb1ab7c7b543518b493ecf9978af87
record_format Article
spelling doaj-30cb1ab7c7b543518b493ecf9978af872021-03-17T00:06:47ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092021-03-011111811810.3390/buildings11030118Displacement Demand for Nonlinear Static Analyses of Masonry Structures: Critical Review and Improved FormulationsGabriele Guerrini0Stylianos Kallioras1Stefano Bracchi2Francesco Graziotti3Andrea Penna4Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAr), University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia PV, ItalyDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAr), University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia PV, ItalyDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAr), University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia PV, ItalyDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAr), University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia PV, ItalyDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAr), University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia PV, ItalyThis paper discusses different formulations for calculating earthquake-induced displacement demands to be associated with nonlinear static analysis procedures for the assessment of masonry structures. Focus is placed on systems with fundamental periods between 0.1 and 0.5 s, for which the inelastic displacement amplification is usually more pronounced. The accuracy of the predictive equations is assessed based on the results from nonlinear time-history analyses, carried out on single-degree-of-freedom oscillators with hysteretic force–displacement relationships representative of masonry structures. First, the study demonstrates some limitations of two established approaches based on the equivalent linearization concept: the capacity spectrum method of the Dutch guidelines NPR 9998-18, and its version outlined in FEMA 440, both of which overpredict maximum displacements. Two codified formulations relying on inelastic displacement spectra are also evaluated, namely the N2 method of Eurocode 8 and the displacement coefficient method of ASCE 41-17: the former proves to be significantly unconservative, while the latter is affected by excessive dispersion. A non-iterative procedure, using an equivalent linear system with calibrated optimal stiffness and equivalent viscous damping, is then proposed to overcome some of the problems identified earlier. A recently developed modified N2 formulation is shown to improve accuracy while limiting the dispersion of the predictions.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/11/3/118capacity spectrum methodequivalent linear systeminelastic displacement spectramasonry structure assessmentnonlinear static analysisseismic displacement demand
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gabriele Guerrini
Stylianos Kallioras
Stefano Bracchi
Francesco Graziotti
Andrea Penna
spellingShingle Gabriele Guerrini
Stylianos Kallioras
Stefano Bracchi
Francesco Graziotti
Andrea Penna
Displacement Demand for Nonlinear Static Analyses of Masonry Structures: Critical Review and Improved Formulations
Buildings
capacity spectrum method
equivalent linear system
inelastic displacement spectra
masonry structure assessment
nonlinear static analysis
seismic displacement demand
author_facet Gabriele Guerrini
Stylianos Kallioras
Stefano Bracchi
Francesco Graziotti
Andrea Penna
author_sort Gabriele Guerrini
title Displacement Demand for Nonlinear Static Analyses of Masonry Structures: Critical Review and Improved Formulations
title_short Displacement Demand for Nonlinear Static Analyses of Masonry Structures: Critical Review and Improved Formulations
title_full Displacement Demand for Nonlinear Static Analyses of Masonry Structures: Critical Review and Improved Formulations
title_fullStr Displacement Demand for Nonlinear Static Analyses of Masonry Structures: Critical Review and Improved Formulations
title_full_unstemmed Displacement Demand for Nonlinear Static Analyses of Masonry Structures: Critical Review and Improved Formulations
title_sort displacement demand for nonlinear static analyses of masonry structures: critical review and improved formulations
publisher MDPI AG
series Buildings
issn 2075-5309
publishDate 2021-03-01
description This paper discusses different formulations for calculating earthquake-induced displacement demands to be associated with nonlinear static analysis procedures for the assessment of masonry structures. Focus is placed on systems with fundamental periods between 0.1 and 0.5 s, for which the inelastic displacement amplification is usually more pronounced. The accuracy of the predictive equations is assessed based on the results from nonlinear time-history analyses, carried out on single-degree-of-freedom oscillators with hysteretic force–displacement relationships representative of masonry structures. First, the study demonstrates some limitations of two established approaches based on the equivalent linearization concept: the capacity spectrum method of the Dutch guidelines NPR 9998-18, and its version outlined in FEMA 440, both of which overpredict maximum displacements. Two codified formulations relying on inelastic displacement spectra are also evaluated, namely the N2 method of Eurocode 8 and the displacement coefficient method of ASCE 41-17: the former proves to be significantly unconservative, while the latter is affected by excessive dispersion. A non-iterative procedure, using an equivalent linear system with calibrated optimal stiffness and equivalent viscous damping, is then proposed to overcome some of the problems identified earlier. A recently developed modified N2 formulation is shown to improve accuracy while limiting the dispersion of the predictions.
topic capacity spectrum method
equivalent linear system
inelastic displacement spectra
masonry structure assessment
nonlinear static analysis
seismic displacement demand
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/11/3/118
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrieleguerrini displacementdemandfornonlinearstaticanalysesofmasonrystructurescriticalreviewandimprovedformulations
AT stylianoskallioras displacementdemandfornonlinearstaticanalysesofmasonrystructurescriticalreviewandimprovedformulations
AT stefanobracchi displacementdemandfornonlinearstaticanalysesofmasonrystructurescriticalreviewandimprovedformulations
AT francescograziotti displacementdemandfornonlinearstaticanalysesofmasonrystructurescriticalreviewandimprovedformulations
AT andreapenna displacementdemandfornonlinearstaticanalysesofmasonrystructurescriticalreviewandimprovedformulations
_version_ 1724218972793995264