The Use of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence in situ Hybridization, and Emerging Epigenetic Markers in the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM): A Review

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive asbestos related disease that is generally considered to be difficult to diagnose, stage and treat. The diagnostic process is continuing to evolve and requires highly skilled pathology input, and generally an extensive list of biomarkers for defi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric Rozitis, Ben Johnson, Yuen Yee Cheng, Kenneth Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.01742/full
id doaj-30ca00545a72493f8d2d0a0e15a89a97
record_format Article
spelling doaj-30ca00545a72493f8d2d0a0e15a89a972020-11-25T02:30:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-09-011010.3389/fonc.2020.01742523977The Use of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence in situ Hybridization, and Emerging Epigenetic Markers in the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM): A ReviewEric Rozitis0Ben Johnson1Yuen Yee Cheng2Kenneth Lee3Kenneth Lee4Kenneth Lee5Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaAsbestos Diseases Research Institute, Concord, NSW, AustraliaAsbestos Diseases Research Institute, Concord, NSW, AustraliaSydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaAsbestos Diseases Research Institute, Concord, NSW, AustraliaAnatomical Pathology Department, NSW Health Pathology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, AustraliaMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive asbestos related disease that is generally considered to be difficult to diagnose, stage and treat. The diagnostic process is continuing to evolve and requires highly skilled pathology input, and generally an extensive list of biomarkers for definitive diagnosis. Diagnosis of MPM requires histological evidence of invasion by malignant mesothelial cells often confirmed by various immunohistochemical biomarkers in order to separate it from pleural metastatic carcinoma. Often when invasion of neoplastic mesothelial cells into adjacent tissue is not apparent, further immunohistochemical testing - namely BAP1 and MTAP, as well as FISH testing for loss of p16 (CDKN2A) are used to separate reactive mesothelial proliferation due to benign processes, from MPM. Various combinations of these markers, such as BAP1 and/or MTAP immunohistochemistry alongside FISH testing for loss of p16, have shown excellent sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of MPM. Additionally, over the recent years, research into epigenetic marker use in the diagnosis of MPM has gained momentum. Although still in their research stages, various markers in DNA methylation, long non-coding RNA, micro RNA, circular RNA, and histone modifications have all been found to support diagnosis of MPM with generally good sensitivity and specificity. Many of these studies are however, limited by small sample sizes or other study limitations and further research into the area would be beneficial. Epigenetic markers show promise for use in the future to facilitate the diagnosis of MPM.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.01742/fullmalignant pleural mesotheliomaCirRNADNA methylationmicroRNAepigenetic biomarkersbiomarkers
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eric Rozitis
Ben Johnson
Yuen Yee Cheng
Kenneth Lee
Kenneth Lee
Kenneth Lee
spellingShingle Eric Rozitis
Ben Johnson
Yuen Yee Cheng
Kenneth Lee
Kenneth Lee
Kenneth Lee
The Use of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence in situ Hybridization, and Emerging Epigenetic Markers in the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM): A Review
Frontiers in Oncology
malignant pleural mesothelioma
CirRNA
DNA methylation
microRNA
epigenetic biomarkers
biomarkers
author_facet Eric Rozitis
Ben Johnson
Yuen Yee Cheng
Kenneth Lee
Kenneth Lee
Kenneth Lee
author_sort Eric Rozitis
title The Use of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence in situ Hybridization, and Emerging Epigenetic Markers in the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM): A Review
title_short The Use of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence in situ Hybridization, and Emerging Epigenetic Markers in the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM): A Review
title_full The Use of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence in situ Hybridization, and Emerging Epigenetic Markers in the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM): A Review
title_fullStr The Use of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence in situ Hybridization, and Emerging Epigenetic Markers in the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM): A Review
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence in situ Hybridization, and Emerging Epigenetic Markers in the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM): A Review
title_sort use of immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and emerging epigenetic markers in the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (mpm): a review
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive asbestos related disease that is generally considered to be difficult to diagnose, stage and treat. The diagnostic process is continuing to evolve and requires highly skilled pathology input, and generally an extensive list of biomarkers for definitive diagnosis. Diagnosis of MPM requires histological evidence of invasion by malignant mesothelial cells often confirmed by various immunohistochemical biomarkers in order to separate it from pleural metastatic carcinoma. Often when invasion of neoplastic mesothelial cells into adjacent tissue is not apparent, further immunohistochemical testing - namely BAP1 and MTAP, as well as FISH testing for loss of p16 (CDKN2A) are used to separate reactive mesothelial proliferation due to benign processes, from MPM. Various combinations of these markers, such as BAP1 and/or MTAP immunohistochemistry alongside FISH testing for loss of p16, have shown excellent sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of MPM. Additionally, over the recent years, research into epigenetic marker use in the diagnosis of MPM has gained momentum. Although still in their research stages, various markers in DNA methylation, long non-coding RNA, micro RNA, circular RNA, and histone modifications have all been found to support diagnosis of MPM with generally good sensitivity and specificity. Many of these studies are however, limited by small sample sizes or other study limitations and further research into the area would be beneficial. Epigenetic markers show promise for use in the future to facilitate the diagnosis of MPM.
topic malignant pleural mesothelioma
CirRNA
DNA methylation
microRNA
epigenetic biomarkers
biomarkers
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.01742/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ericrozitis theuseofimmunohistochemistryfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandemergingepigeneticmarkersinthediagnosisofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomampmareview
AT benjohnson theuseofimmunohistochemistryfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandemergingepigeneticmarkersinthediagnosisofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomampmareview
AT yuenyeecheng theuseofimmunohistochemistryfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandemergingepigeneticmarkersinthediagnosisofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomampmareview
AT kennethlee theuseofimmunohistochemistryfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandemergingepigeneticmarkersinthediagnosisofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomampmareview
AT kennethlee theuseofimmunohistochemistryfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandemergingepigeneticmarkersinthediagnosisofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomampmareview
AT kennethlee theuseofimmunohistochemistryfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandemergingepigeneticmarkersinthediagnosisofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomampmareview
AT ericrozitis useofimmunohistochemistryfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandemergingepigeneticmarkersinthediagnosisofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomampmareview
AT benjohnson useofimmunohistochemistryfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandemergingepigeneticmarkersinthediagnosisofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomampmareview
AT yuenyeecheng useofimmunohistochemistryfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandemergingepigeneticmarkersinthediagnosisofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomampmareview
AT kennethlee useofimmunohistochemistryfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandemergingepigeneticmarkersinthediagnosisofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomampmareview
AT kennethlee useofimmunohistochemistryfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandemergingepigeneticmarkersinthediagnosisofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomampmareview
AT kennethlee useofimmunohistochemistryfluorescenceinsituhybridizationandemergingepigeneticmarkersinthediagnosisofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomampmareview
_version_ 1724828242966216704