Energy-Momentum Relocalization, Surface Terms, and Massless Poles in Axial Current Matrix Elements
The energy-momentum relocalization in classical and quantum theory is addressed with<br />specific impact on non-perturbative QCD and hadronic structure. The relocalization is manifested in<br />the existence of canonical and symmetric (Belinfante and Hilbert) energy momentum tensors (EM...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Symmetry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/9/1409 |
id |
doaj-30bb5ba31c3040f7a460f77a27703407 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-30bb5ba31c3040f7a460f77a277034072020-11-25T03:43:34ZengMDPI AGSymmetry2073-89942020-08-01121409140910.3390/sym12091409Energy-Momentum Relocalization, Surface Terms, and Massless Poles in Axial Current Matrix ElementsOleg Teryaev0Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, RussiaThe energy-momentum relocalization in classical and quantum theory is addressed with<br />specific impact on non-perturbative QCD and hadronic structure. The relocalization is manifested in<br />the existence of canonical and symmetric (Belinfante and Hilbert) energy momentum tensors (EMT).<br />The latter describes the interactions of hadrons with classical gravity and inertia. Canonical EMT,<br />in turn, is naturally emerging due to the translation invariance symmetry and appears when spin<br />structure of hadrons is considered. Its relation to symmetric Hilbert and Belinfante EMTs requires<br />the possibility to neglect the contribution of boundary terms for the classical fields. For the case of<br />quantum fields this property corresponds to the absence of zero-momentum poles of matrix element<br />of the axial current dual to the spin density. This property is satisfied for quarks manifesting the<br />symmetry counterpart of <em>U<sub>A</sub>(1)</em> problem and may be violated for gluons due to QCD ghost pole.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/9/1409gravityrelocalizationtopologyboundarypoles |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Oleg Teryaev |
spellingShingle |
Oleg Teryaev Energy-Momentum Relocalization, Surface Terms, and Massless Poles in Axial Current Matrix Elements Symmetry gravity relocalization topology boundary poles |
author_facet |
Oleg Teryaev |
author_sort |
Oleg Teryaev |
title |
Energy-Momentum Relocalization, Surface Terms,
and Massless Poles in Axial Current Matrix Elements |
title_short |
Energy-Momentum Relocalization, Surface Terms,
and Massless Poles in Axial Current Matrix Elements |
title_full |
Energy-Momentum Relocalization, Surface Terms,
and Massless Poles in Axial Current Matrix Elements |
title_fullStr |
Energy-Momentum Relocalization, Surface Terms,
and Massless Poles in Axial Current Matrix Elements |
title_full_unstemmed |
Energy-Momentum Relocalization, Surface Terms,
and Massless Poles in Axial Current Matrix Elements |
title_sort |
energy-momentum relocalization, surface terms,
and massless poles in axial current matrix elements |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Symmetry |
issn |
2073-8994 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
The energy-momentum relocalization in classical and quantum theory is addressed with<br />specific impact on non-perturbative QCD and hadronic structure. The relocalization is manifested in<br />the existence of canonical and symmetric (Belinfante and Hilbert) energy momentum tensors (EMT).<br />The latter describes the interactions of hadrons with classical gravity and inertia. Canonical EMT,<br />in turn, is naturally emerging due to the translation invariance symmetry and appears when spin<br />structure of hadrons is considered. Its relation to symmetric Hilbert and Belinfante EMTs requires<br />the possibility to neglect the contribution of boundary terms for the classical fields. For the case of<br />quantum fields this property corresponds to the absence of zero-momentum poles of matrix element<br />of the axial current dual to the spin density. This property is satisfied for quarks manifesting the<br />symmetry counterpart of <em>U<sub>A</sub>(1)</em> problem and may be violated for gluons due to QCD ghost pole. |
topic |
gravity relocalization topology boundary poles |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/9/1409 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olegteryaev energymomentumrelocalizationsurfacetermsandmasslesspolesinaxialcurrentmatrixelements |
_version_ |
1724518958010204160 |