Strategic predictors of performance in a divided attention task.

In this study we investigate the strategies of subjects in a complex divided attention task. We conducted a series of experiments with ten participants and evaluated their performance. After an extensive analysis, we identified four strategic measures that justify the achievement of the participants...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Róbert Adrian Rill, Kinga Bettina Faragó, András Lőrincz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5886418?pdf=render
id doaj-3090ae4c2e7641369fc7cbfaa6cb29b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3090ae4c2e7641369fc7cbfaa6cb29b72020-11-24T21:32:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01134e019513110.1371/journal.pone.0195131Strategic predictors of performance in a divided attention task.Róbert Adrian RillKinga Bettina FaragóAndrás LőrinczIn this study we investigate the strategies of subjects in a complex divided attention task. We conducted a series of experiments with ten participants and evaluated their performance. After an extensive analysis, we identified four strategic measures that justify the achievement of the participants, by highlighting the individual differences and predicting performance in a regression analysis using generalized estimating equations. Selecting the more urgent task and user action between multiple simultaneous possibilities form two of the strategic decisions, respectively. The third one refers to choosing a response within the same task when the opportunity is present. The fourth and most important measure of strategy involves thinking ahead and executing an action before a situation would become critical. This latter one has the effect of reducing later cognitive load or timing constraints and it is shown to explain almost as much variance in performance as the other three, more straightforward predictors together. In addition to determining these strategic predictors, we also show how manipulating task difficulty induces a shift in strategy, thus impairing human performance in the rehearsed task. The results of this study indicate that considerable differences in the divided attention ability of normal subjects can be identified early and with simple measurements. The importance of describing and analyzing strategies is also emphasized, which can substantially influence performance in complex tasks and may serve training needs.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5886418?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Róbert Adrian Rill
Kinga Bettina Faragó
András Lőrincz
spellingShingle Róbert Adrian Rill
Kinga Bettina Faragó
András Lőrincz
Strategic predictors of performance in a divided attention task.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Róbert Adrian Rill
Kinga Bettina Faragó
András Lőrincz
author_sort Róbert Adrian Rill
title Strategic predictors of performance in a divided attention task.
title_short Strategic predictors of performance in a divided attention task.
title_full Strategic predictors of performance in a divided attention task.
title_fullStr Strategic predictors of performance in a divided attention task.
title_full_unstemmed Strategic predictors of performance in a divided attention task.
title_sort strategic predictors of performance in a divided attention task.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description In this study we investigate the strategies of subjects in a complex divided attention task. We conducted a series of experiments with ten participants and evaluated their performance. After an extensive analysis, we identified four strategic measures that justify the achievement of the participants, by highlighting the individual differences and predicting performance in a regression analysis using generalized estimating equations. Selecting the more urgent task and user action between multiple simultaneous possibilities form two of the strategic decisions, respectively. The third one refers to choosing a response within the same task when the opportunity is present. The fourth and most important measure of strategy involves thinking ahead and executing an action before a situation would become critical. This latter one has the effect of reducing later cognitive load or timing constraints and it is shown to explain almost as much variance in performance as the other three, more straightforward predictors together. In addition to determining these strategic predictors, we also show how manipulating task difficulty induces a shift in strategy, thus impairing human performance in the rehearsed task. The results of this study indicate that considerable differences in the divided attention ability of normal subjects can be identified early and with simple measurements. The importance of describing and analyzing strategies is also emphasized, which can substantially influence performance in complex tasks and may serve training needs.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5886418?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT robertadrianrill strategicpredictorsofperformanceinadividedattentiontask
AT kingabettinafarago strategicpredictorsofperformanceinadividedattentiontask
AT andraslorincz strategicpredictorsofperformanceinadividedattentiontask
_version_ 1725956822309797888