Comparison of Atrial Fibrillation in the Young versus That in the Elderly: A Review

The incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) are projected to increase significantly worldwide, imposing a significant burden on healthcare resources. The disease itself is extremely heterogeneous in its epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment options based on individual patient cha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajiv Sankaranarayanan, Graeme Kirkwood, Katharine Dibb, Clifford J. Garratt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Cardiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/976976
id doaj-305f5e703ff74e79a5d8968ff37e7012
record_format Article
spelling doaj-305f5e703ff74e79a5d8968ff37e70122020-11-24T23:13:42ZengHindawi LimitedCardiology Research and Practice2090-80162090-05972013-01-01201310.1155/2013/976976976976Comparison of Atrial Fibrillation in the Young versus That in the Elderly: A ReviewRajiv Sankaranarayanan0Graeme Kirkwood1Katharine Dibb2Clifford J. Garratt3Unit of Cardiac Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Group, 3rd Floor, Core Technology Facility, The University of Manchester, M139PL, Grafton Street, Manchester M13 9NT, UKUnit of Cardiac Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Group, 3rd Floor, Core Technology Facility, The University of Manchester, M139PL, Grafton Street, Manchester M13 9NT, UKManchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WPL, UKUnit of Cardiac Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Group, 3rd Floor, Core Technology Facility, The University of Manchester, M139PL, Grafton Street, Manchester M13 9NT, UKThe incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) are projected to increase significantly worldwide, imposing a significant burden on healthcare resources. The disease itself is extremely heterogeneous in its epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment options based on individual patient characteristics. Whilst ageing is well recognised to be an independent risk factor for the development of AF, this condition also affects the young in whom the condition is frequently symptomatic and troublesome. Traditional thinking suggests that the causal factors and pathogenesis of the condition in the young with structurally normal atria but electrophysiological “triggers” in the form of pulmonary vein ectopics leading to lone AF are in stark contrast to that in the elderly who have AF primarily due to an abnormal substrate consisting of fibrosed and dilated atria acting in concert with the pulmonary vein triggers. However, there can be exceptions to this rule as there is increasing evidence of structural and electrophysiological abnormalities in the atrial substrate in young patients with “lone AF,” as well as elderly patients who present with idiopathic AF. These reports seem to be blurring the distinction in the pathophysiology of so-called idiopathic lone AF in the young versus that in the elderly. Moreover with availability of improved and modern investigational and diagnostic techniques, novel causes of AF are being reported thereby seemingly consigning the diagnosis of “lone AF” to a rather mythical existence. We shall also elucidate in this paper the differences seen in the epidemiology, causes, pathogenesis, and clinical features of AF in the young versus that seen in the elderly, thereby requiring clearly defined management strategies to tackle this arrhythmia and its associated consequences.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/976976
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rajiv Sankaranarayanan
Graeme Kirkwood
Katharine Dibb
Clifford J. Garratt
spellingShingle Rajiv Sankaranarayanan
Graeme Kirkwood
Katharine Dibb
Clifford J. Garratt
Comparison of Atrial Fibrillation in the Young versus That in the Elderly: A Review
Cardiology Research and Practice
author_facet Rajiv Sankaranarayanan
Graeme Kirkwood
Katharine Dibb
Clifford J. Garratt
author_sort Rajiv Sankaranarayanan
title Comparison of Atrial Fibrillation in the Young versus That in the Elderly: A Review
title_short Comparison of Atrial Fibrillation in the Young versus That in the Elderly: A Review
title_full Comparison of Atrial Fibrillation in the Young versus That in the Elderly: A Review
title_fullStr Comparison of Atrial Fibrillation in the Young versus That in the Elderly: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Atrial Fibrillation in the Young versus That in the Elderly: A Review
title_sort comparison of atrial fibrillation in the young versus that in the elderly: a review
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Cardiology Research and Practice
issn 2090-8016
2090-0597
publishDate 2013-01-01
description The incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) are projected to increase significantly worldwide, imposing a significant burden on healthcare resources. The disease itself is extremely heterogeneous in its epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment options based on individual patient characteristics. Whilst ageing is well recognised to be an independent risk factor for the development of AF, this condition also affects the young in whom the condition is frequently symptomatic and troublesome. Traditional thinking suggests that the causal factors and pathogenesis of the condition in the young with structurally normal atria but electrophysiological “triggers” in the form of pulmonary vein ectopics leading to lone AF are in stark contrast to that in the elderly who have AF primarily due to an abnormal substrate consisting of fibrosed and dilated atria acting in concert with the pulmonary vein triggers. However, there can be exceptions to this rule as there is increasing evidence of structural and electrophysiological abnormalities in the atrial substrate in young patients with “lone AF,” as well as elderly patients who present with idiopathic AF. These reports seem to be blurring the distinction in the pathophysiology of so-called idiopathic lone AF in the young versus that in the elderly. Moreover with availability of improved and modern investigational and diagnostic techniques, novel causes of AF are being reported thereby seemingly consigning the diagnosis of “lone AF” to a rather mythical existence. We shall also elucidate in this paper the differences seen in the epidemiology, causes, pathogenesis, and clinical features of AF in the young versus that seen in the elderly, thereby requiring clearly defined management strategies to tackle this arrhythmia and its associated consequences.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/976976
work_keys_str_mv AT rajivsankaranarayanan comparisonofatrialfibrillationintheyoungversusthatintheelderlyareview
AT graemekirkwood comparisonofatrialfibrillationintheyoungversusthatintheelderlyareview
AT katharinedibb comparisonofatrialfibrillationintheyoungversusthatintheelderlyareview
AT cliffordjgarratt comparisonofatrialfibrillationintheyoungversusthatintheelderlyareview
_version_ 1725597027827449856