Socratic Silence in the Cleitophon
Plato’s Cleitophon is the only dialogue in which Plato presents an unanswered rebuke of Socratic philosophy by an interlocutor. Consequently, most commentators have thus rejected the dialogue as inauthentic, or have otherwise explained away the bewildering Socratic silence at the dialogue’s conclus...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Coimbra University Press
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Plato |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/platojournal/article/view/5315 |
id |
doaj-30513115885b4cbfa67c3c637fdfb41b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-30513115885b4cbfa67c3c637fdfb41b2020-11-25T03:47:15ZengCoimbra University PressPlato2079-75672183-41052018-03-011710.14195/2183-4105_17_4Socratic Silence in the CleitophonAlan Pichanick0Villanova University Plato’s Cleitophon is the only dialogue in which Plato presents an unanswered rebuke of Socratic philosophy by an interlocutor. Consequently, most commentators have thus rejected the dialogue as inauthentic, or have otherwise explained away the bewildering Socratic silence at the dialogue’s conclusion. In this paper I explore why Socrates chooses silence as the response to Cleitophon’s rebuke of Socrates. I argue that (and why) Socratic silence is the only way of “talking” with Cleitophon: Cleitophon’s “Socratic speech” implies notions about nomos, the soul, and philosophy that turn out to be uniquely anti-Socratic. The dramatic disjunctions between Cleitophon’s distorted image of Socrates and the real Socrates, and between Cleitophon himself and Socrates, not only make most poignant the tension between the philosopher and the city but also point to the very conditions of philosophical dialogue. https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/platojournal/article/view/5315Cleitophon, Eros, Self-knowledge, Socratic Circle, Protreptic, Apology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alan Pichanick |
spellingShingle |
Alan Pichanick Socratic Silence in the Cleitophon Plato Cleitophon, Eros, Self-knowledge, Socratic Circle, Protreptic, Apology |
author_facet |
Alan Pichanick |
author_sort |
Alan Pichanick |
title |
Socratic Silence in the Cleitophon |
title_short |
Socratic Silence in the Cleitophon |
title_full |
Socratic Silence in the Cleitophon |
title_fullStr |
Socratic Silence in the Cleitophon |
title_full_unstemmed |
Socratic Silence in the Cleitophon |
title_sort |
socratic silence in the cleitophon |
publisher |
Coimbra University Press |
series |
Plato |
issn |
2079-7567 2183-4105 |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
Plato’s Cleitophon is the only dialogue in which Plato presents an unanswered rebuke of Socratic philosophy by an interlocutor. Consequently, most commentators have thus rejected the dialogue as inauthentic, or have otherwise explained away the bewildering Socratic silence at the dialogue’s conclusion. In this paper I explore why Socrates chooses silence as the response to Cleitophon’s rebuke of Socrates. I argue that (and why) Socratic silence is the only way of “talking” with Cleitophon: Cleitophon’s “Socratic speech” implies notions about nomos, the soul, and philosophy that turn out to be uniquely anti-Socratic. The dramatic disjunctions between Cleitophon’s distorted image of Socrates and the real Socrates, and between Cleitophon himself and Socrates, not only make most poignant the tension between the philosopher and the city but also point to the very conditions of philosophical dialogue.
|
topic |
Cleitophon, Eros, Self-knowledge, Socratic Circle, Protreptic, Apology |
url |
https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/platojournal/article/view/5315 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alanpichanick socraticsilenceinthecleitophon |
_version_ |
1724502723589570560 |