Periféria kultúry, periféria umenia: Dubuffet dnes
Globalization trends of culture, the idea of multiculturalism, bringing and acceptance of foreign elements into the culture, open coquetry of the "West" with culture and arts of the "East", eclecticism, but also paradoxical what happened to be the fate of modern art after postmod...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | ces |
Published: |
University of Presov, Faculty of Arts
2015-06-01
|
Series: | ESPES |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://espes.ff.unipo.sk/index.php/ESPES/article/view/23 |
id |
doaj-3043045289bd4f70aee640fdc4bf31e7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3043045289bd4f70aee640fdc4bf31e72021-04-02T09:34:51ZcesUniversity of Presov, Faculty of ArtsESPES1339-11192015-06-0141212527Periféria kultúry, periféria umenia: Dubuffet dnesAdrián Kvokačka0Institute of Aesthetics and Art Culture, Faculty of Arts, University of PresovGlobalization trends of culture, the idea of multiculturalism, bringing and acceptance of foreign elements into the culture, open coquetry of the "West" with culture and arts of the "East", eclecticism, but also paradoxical what happened to be the fate of modern art after postmodern deconstruction of the meaning (including also the sense of Art) and the reduction of his function to ability to serve in variable updating roles towards individual and society, is 46 years after the release of books Asphyxiating Culture repeatedly bringing me to read and review it. The topic, therefore, is to examine the validity of Dubuffet appeal, its insertion into the broader context of the forms of "dehumanization" of art, but also review of the reference just in the context of relations culture - art. New search respectively the determination of periphery in arts and culture should besides unfinished theme energizing academic debate of last years, if not decades, thus defining theme of Art (it defines itself not only its center, but also its periphery), can and should briefly look at the issue of the institutionalization of art; the relationship of artistic production and its cultural context, which is not transferable; "foucaultian" power of discourse established by culture; extremely interesting affinity of art and advertising; aestheticism of culture; enforcement of discontinuity issues and pluralism as in the thought (philosophy, and culture in general) also within the artistic creation, namely for topics that Dubuffet advises and argumentations plays. Nearly half a century after his call and its final words -"therefore, our artistic production, which is not subjected to a thorough critique of culture and effectively not reveals the futility and absurdity, is no refuge for us" - we need to talk about our accountability. Dubuffet today.https://espes.ff.unipo.sk/index.php/ESPES/article/view/23aestheticsDubuffetcultureart |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
ces |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Adrián Kvokačka |
spellingShingle |
Adrián Kvokačka Periféria kultúry, periféria umenia: Dubuffet dnes ESPES aesthetics Dubuffet culture art |
author_facet |
Adrián Kvokačka |
author_sort |
Adrián Kvokačka |
title |
Periféria kultúry, periféria umenia: Dubuffet dnes |
title_short |
Periféria kultúry, periféria umenia: Dubuffet dnes |
title_full |
Periféria kultúry, periféria umenia: Dubuffet dnes |
title_fullStr |
Periféria kultúry, periféria umenia: Dubuffet dnes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Periféria kultúry, periféria umenia: Dubuffet dnes |
title_sort |
periféria kultúry, periféria umenia: dubuffet dnes |
publisher |
University of Presov, Faculty of Arts |
series |
ESPES |
issn |
1339-1119 |
publishDate |
2015-06-01 |
description |
Globalization trends of culture, the idea of multiculturalism, bringing and acceptance of foreign elements into the culture, open coquetry of the "West" with culture and arts of the "East", eclecticism, but also paradoxical what happened to be the fate of modern art after postmodern deconstruction of the meaning (including also the sense of Art) and the reduction of his function to ability to serve in variable updating roles towards individual and society, is 46 years after the release of books Asphyxiating Culture repeatedly bringing me to read and review it. The topic, therefore, is to examine the validity of Dubuffet appeal, its insertion into the broader context of the forms of "dehumanization" of art, but also review of the reference just in the context of relations culture - art. New search respectively the determination of periphery in arts and culture should besides unfinished theme energizing academic debate of last years, if not decades, thus defining theme of Art (it defines itself not only its center, but also its periphery), can and should briefly look at the issue of the institutionalization of art; the relationship of artistic production and its cultural context, which is not transferable; "foucaultian" power of discourse established by culture; extremely interesting affinity of art and advertising; aestheticism of culture; enforcement of discontinuity issues and pluralism as in the thought (philosophy, and culture in general) also within the artistic creation, namely for topics that Dubuffet advises and argumentations plays. Nearly half a century after his call and its final words -"therefore, our artistic production, which is not subjected to a thorough critique of culture and effectively not reveals the futility and absurdity, is no refuge for us" - we need to talk about our accountability. Dubuffet today. |
topic |
aesthetics Dubuffet culture art |
url |
https://espes.ff.unipo.sk/index.php/ESPES/article/view/23 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT adriankvokacka periferiakulturyperiferiaumeniadubuffetdnes |
_version_ |
1724169076379484160 |