Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry

The aim of this study was to compare the applicability and the correlation between three commercially available instruments capable of detection, quantification, and characterization of ultrafine airborne particulate matter in the industrial setting of a tapping area in a silicon alloy production pl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ida Teresia Kero, Rikke Bramming Jørgensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-09-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/9/871
id doaj-302c874116214adc89140c84fe3871f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-302c874116214adc89140c84fe3871f02020-11-24T23:29:35ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012016-09-0113987110.3390/ijerph13090871ijerph13090871Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy IndustryIda Teresia Kero0Rikke Bramming Jørgensen1Department of Industrial Process, Technology SINTEF Materials and Chemistry, P.O. Box. 4760, NO-7465 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NorwayThe aim of this study was to compare the applicability and the correlation between three commercially available instruments capable of detection, quantification, and characterization of ultrafine airborne particulate matter in the industrial setting of a tapping area in a silicon alloy production plant. The number concentration of ultrafine particles was evaluated using an Electric Low Pressure Impactor (ELPITM), a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPSTM), and a Condensation Particle Counter (CPC). The results are discussed in terms of particle size distribution and temporal variations linked to process operations. The instruments show excellent temporal covariation and the correlation between the FMPS and ELPI is good. The advantage of the FMPS is the excellent time- and size resolution of the results. The main advantage of the ELPI is the possibility to collect size-fractionated samples of the dust for subsequent analysis by, for example, electron microscopy. The CPC does not provide information about the particle size distribution and its correlation to the other two instruments is somewhat poor. Nonetheless, the CPC gives basic, real-time information about the ultrafine particle concentration and can therefore be used for source identification.http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/9/871electric arc furnace tappingsilica fumeairborne particulate matteraerodynamic diametermobility diameterelectric low pressure impactorfast mobility particle sizercondensation particle counter
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ida Teresia Kero
Rikke Bramming Jørgensen
spellingShingle Ida Teresia Kero
Rikke Bramming Jørgensen
Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
electric arc furnace tapping
silica fume
airborne particulate matter
aerodynamic diameter
mobility diameter
electric low pressure impactor
fast mobility particle sizer
condensation particle counter
author_facet Ida Teresia Kero
Rikke Bramming Jørgensen
author_sort Ida Teresia Kero
title Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry
title_short Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry
title_full Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry
title_fullStr Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry
title_sort comparison of three real-time measurement methods for airborne ultrafine particles in the silicon alloy industry
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1660-4601
publishDate 2016-09-01
description The aim of this study was to compare the applicability and the correlation between three commercially available instruments capable of detection, quantification, and characterization of ultrafine airborne particulate matter in the industrial setting of a tapping area in a silicon alloy production plant. The number concentration of ultrafine particles was evaluated using an Electric Low Pressure Impactor (ELPITM), a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPSTM), and a Condensation Particle Counter (CPC). The results are discussed in terms of particle size distribution and temporal variations linked to process operations. The instruments show excellent temporal covariation and the correlation between the FMPS and ELPI is good. The advantage of the FMPS is the excellent time- and size resolution of the results. The main advantage of the ELPI is the possibility to collect size-fractionated samples of the dust for subsequent analysis by, for example, electron microscopy. The CPC does not provide information about the particle size distribution and its correlation to the other two instruments is somewhat poor. Nonetheless, the CPC gives basic, real-time information about the ultrafine particle concentration and can therefore be used for source identification.
topic electric arc furnace tapping
silica fume
airborne particulate matter
aerodynamic diameter
mobility diameter
electric low pressure impactor
fast mobility particle sizer
condensation particle counter
url http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/9/871
work_keys_str_mv AT idateresiakero comparisonofthreerealtimemeasurementmethodsforairborneultrafineparticlesinthesiliconalloyindustry
AT rikkebrammingjørgensen comparisonofthreerealtimemeasurementmethodsforairborneultrafineparticlesinthesiliconalloyindustry
_version_ 1725544861270016000