Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry
The aim of this study was to compare the applicability and the correlation between three commercially available instruments capable of detection, quantification, and characterization of ultrafine airborne particulate matter in the industrial setting of a tapping area in a silicon alloy production pl...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-09-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/9/871 |
id |
doaj-302c874116214adc89140c84fe3871f0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-302c874116214adc89140c84fe3871f02020-11-24T23:29:35ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012016-09-0113987110.3390/ijerph13090871ijerph13090871Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy IndustryIda Teresia Kero0Rikke Bramming Jørgensen1Department of Industrial Process, Technology SINTEF Materials and Chemistry, P.O. Box. 4760, NO-7465 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NorwayThe aim of this study was to compare the applicability and the correlation between three commercially available instruments capable of detection, quantification, and characterization of ultrafine airborne particulate matter in the industrial setting of a tapping area in a silicon alloy production plant. The number concentration of ultrafine particles was evaluated using an Electric Low Pressure Impactor (ELPITM), a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPSTM), and a Condensation Particle Counter (CPC). The results are discussed in terms of particle size distribution and temporal variations linked to process operations. The instruments show excellent temporal covariation and the correlation between the FMPS and ELPI is good. The advantage of the FMPS is the excellent time- and size resolution of the results. The main advantage of the ELPI is the possibility to collect size-fractionated samples of the dust for subsequent analysis by, for example, electron microscopy. The CPC does not provide information about the particle size distribution and its correlation to the other two instruments is somewhat poor. Nonetheless, the CPC gives basic, real-time information about the ultrafine particle concentration and can therefore be used for source identification.http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/9/871electric arc furnace tappingsilica fumeairborne particulate matteraerodynamic diametermobility diameterelectric low pressure impactorfast mobility particle sizercondensation particle counter |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ida Teresia Kero Rikke Bramming Jørgensen |
spellingShingle |
Ida Teresia Kero Rikke Bramming Jørgensen Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health electric arc furnace tapping silica fume airborne particulate matter aerodynamic diameter mobility diameter electric low pressure impactor fast mobility particle sizer condensation particle counter |
author_facet |
Ida Teresia Kero Rikke Bramming Jørgensen |
author_sort |
Ida Teresia Kero |
title |
Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry |
title_short |
Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry |
title_full |
Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry |
title_sort |
comparison of three real-time measurement methods for airborne ultrafine particles in the silicon alloy industry |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2016-09-01 |
description |
The aim of this study was to compare the applicability and the correlation between three commercially available instruments capable of detection, quantification, and characterization of ultrafine airborne particulate matter in the industrial setting of a tapping area in a silicon alloy production plant. The number concentration of ultrafine particles was evaluated using an Electric Low Pressure Impactor (ELPITM), a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPSTM), and a Condensation Particle Counter (CPC). The results are discussed in terms of particle size distribution and temporal variations linked to process operations. The instruments show excellent temporal covariation and the correlation between the FMPS and ELPI is good. The advantage of the FMPS is the excellent time- and size resolution of the results. The main advantage of the ELPI is the possibility to collect size-fractionated samples of the dust for subsequent analysis by, for example, electron microscopy. The CPC does not provide information about the particle size distribution and its correlation to the other two instruments is somewhat poor. Nonetheless, the CPC gives basic, real-time information about the ultrafine particle concentration and can therefore be used for source identification. |
topic |
electric arc furnace tapping silica fume airborne particulate matter aerodynamic diameter mobility diameter electric low pressure impactor fast mobility particle sizer condensation particle counter |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/9/871 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT idateresiakero comparisonofthreerealtimemeasurementmethodsforairborneultrafineparticlesinthesiliconalloyindustry AT rikkebrammingjørgensen comparisonofthreerealtimemeasurementmethodsforairborneultrafineparticlesinthesiliconalloyindustry |
_version_ |
1725544861270016000 |