Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the global South

This paper examines folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify in order to make visible the cultural specificities of data assemblages in the global South. The study was conducted in Costa Rica and draws on triangulated data from 30 interviews, 4 focus groups with 22 users, and the stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ignacio Siles, Andrés Segura-Castillo, Ricardo Solís, Mónica Sancho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-04-01
Series:Big Data & Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720923377
id doaj-30281e769d8d4ee7a0e5963c2a72f2a8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-30281e769d8d4ee7a0e5963c2a72f2a82020-11-25T03:30:57ZengSAGE PublishingBig Data & Society2053-95172020-04-01710.1177/2053951720923377Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the global SouthIgnacio SilesAndrés Segura-CastilloRicardo SolísMónica SanchoThis paper examines folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify in order to make visible the cultural specificities of data assemblages in the global South. The study was conducted in Costa Rica and draws on triangulated data from 30 interviews, 4 focus groups with 22 users, and the study of “rich pictures” made by individuals to graphically represent their understanding of algorithmic recommendations. We found two main folk theories: one that personifies Spotify (and conceives of it as a social being that provides recommendations thanks to surveillance) and another one that envisions it as a system full of resources (and a computational machine that offers an individualized musical experience through the appropriate kind of “training”). Whereas the first theory emphasizes local conceptions of social relations to make sense of algorithms, the second one stresses the role of algorithms in providing a global experience of music and technology. We analyze why people espouse either one of these theories (or both) and how these theories provide users with resources to enact different modalities of power and resistance in relation to recommendation algorithms. We argue that folk theories thus offer a productive way to broaden understanding of what agency means in relation to algorithms.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720923377
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ignacio Siles
Andrés Segura-Castillo
Ricardo Solís
Mónica Sancho
spellingShingle Ignacio Siles
Andrés Segura-Castillo
Ricardo Solís
Mónica Sancho
Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the global South
Big Data & Society
author_facet Ignacio Siles
Andrés Segura-Castillo
Ricardo Solís
Mónica Sancho
author_sort Ignacio Siles
title Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the global South
title_short Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the global South
title_full Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the global South
title_fullStr Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the global South
title_full_unstemmed Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the global South
title_sort folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on spotify: enacting data assemblages in the global south
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Big Data & Society
issn 2053-9517
publishDate 2020-04-01
description This paper examines folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify in order to make visible the cultural specificities of data assemblages in the global South. The study was conducted in Costa Rica and draws on triangulated data from 30 interviews, 4 focus groups with 22 users, and the study of “rich pictures” made by individuals to graphically represent their understanding of algorithmic recommendations. We found two main folk theories: one that personifies Spotify (and conceives of it as a social being that provides recommendations thanks to surveillance) and another one that envisions it as a system full of resources (and a computational machine that offers an individualized musical experience through the appropriate kind of “training”). Whereas the first theory emphasizes local conceptions of social relations to make sense of algorithms, the second one stresses the role of algorithms in providing a global experience of music and technology. We analyze why people espouse either one of these theories (or both) and how these theories provide users with resources to enact different modalities of power and resistance in relation to recommendation algorithms. We argue that folk theories thus offer a productive way to broaden understanding of what agency means in relation to algorithms.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720923377
work_keys_str_mv AT ignaciosiles folktheoriesofalgorithmicrecommendationsonspotifyenactingdataassemblagesintheglobalsouth
AT andresseguracastillo folktheoriesofalgorithmicrecommendationsonspotifyenactingdataassemblagesintheglobalsouth
AT ricardosolis folktheoriesofalgorithmicrecommendationsonspotifyenactingdataassemblagesintheglobalsouth
AT monicasancho folktheoriesofalgorithmicrecommendationsonspotifyenactingdataassemblagesintheglobalsouth
_version_ 1724574549546106880