Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey
<p class="FreeForm">This paper aims to discuss how “the discourse of creative labor” is being reproduced as an apparatus of exploitation in the architectural labor processes of twenty-first-century Turkey through “architect-workers.” The discourse of creative labor has deepened the e...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hacettepe University
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Momentdergi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.momentjournal.org/index.php/momentdergi/article/view/355 |
id |
doaj-30265910bc4b4641826155915e82764b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-30265910bc4b4641826155915e82764b2021-01-03T10:23:23ZengHacettepe UniversityMomentdergi2148-970X2018-12-0152201Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in TurkeyGülşah Aykaç0Esra Sert1Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık BölümüOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Bölümü<p class="FreeForm">This paper aims to discuss how “the discourse of creative labor” is being reproduced as an apparatus of exploitation in the architectural labor processes of twenty-first-century Turkey through “architect-workers.” The discourse of creative labor has deepened the exploitation of architect-workers, as all workers, and defines the very privileged position of architect-boss in relation to other laborers. This exploitation became visible both in Turkey and worldwide through the comments of architects—who are both bosses of their architecture firms and so-called <em>starchitects—</em>about their own positions and practices. In addition, twenty-first-century architecture in Turkey can be criticized for the increasing precarity that has stemmed from the processes of <em>yapsatçılık</em> and mega-projects. To cope with this exploitation, “the discourse of creative labor” can also be reproduced by architect-workers. Consequently, this paper aims to provide ground on which to problematize the architect-worker as a member of the working class, as well as in the context of a discourse on creative labor and its exploitative use in the labor processes of architecture.</p>http://www.momentjournal.org/index.php/momentdergi/article/view/355mimarlıkta emek süreçlerimimarlıkta yaratıcı emekmimar-işçitürkiye’de mimarlıkmimarlık eleştirisi |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gülşah Aykaç Esra Sert |
spellingShingle |
Gülşah Aykaç Esra Sert Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey Momentdergi mimarlıkta emek süreçleri mimarlıkta yaratıcı emek mimar-işçi türkiye’de mimarlık mimarlık eleştirisi |
author_facet |
Gülşah Aykaç Esra Sert |
author_sort |
Gülşah Aykaç |
title |
Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey |
title_short |
Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey |
title_full |
Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey |
title_fullStr |
Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey |
title_sort |
rethinking the labor processes of architecture in turkey |
publisher |
Hacettepe University |
series |
Momentdergi |
issn |
2148-970X |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
<p class="FreeForm">This paper aims to discuss how “the discourse of creative labor” is being reproduced as an apparatus of exploitation in the architectural labor processes of twenty-first-century Turkey through “architect-workers.” The discourse of creative labor has deepened the exploitation of architect-workers, as all workers, and defines the very privileged position of architect-boss in relation to other laborers. This exploitation became visible both in Turkey and worldwide through the comments of architects—who are both bosses of their architecture firms and so-called <em>starchitects—</em>about their own positions and practices. In addition, twenty-first-century architecture in Turkey can be criticized for the increasing precarity that has stemmed from the processes of <em>yapsatçılık</em> and mega-projects. To cope with this exploitation, “the discourse of creative labor” can also be reproduced by architect-workers. Consequently, this paper aims to provide ground on which to problematize the architect-worker as a member of the working class, as well as in the context of a discourse on creative labor and its exploitative use in the labor processes of architecture.</p> |
topic |
mimarlıkta emek süreçleri mimarlıkta yaratıcı emek mimar-işçi türkiye’de mimarlık mimarlık eleştirisi |
url |
http://www.momentjournal.org/index.php/momentdergi/article/view/355 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gulsahaykac rethinkingthelaborprocessesofarchitectureinturkey AT esrasert rethinkingthelaborprocessesofarchitectureinturkey |
_version_ |
1724350927974957056 |