Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey

<p class="FreeForm">This paper aims to discuss how “the discourse of creative labor” is being reproduced as an apparatus of exploitation in the architectural labor processes of twenty-first-century Turkey through “architect-workers.” The discourse of creative labor has deepened the e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gülşah Aykaç, Esra Sert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hacettepe University 2018-12-01
Series:Momentdergi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.momentjournal.org/index.php/momentdergi/article/view/355
id doaj-30265910bc4b4641826155915e82764b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-30265910bc4b4641826155915e82764b2021-01-03T10:23:23ZengHacettepe UniversityMomentdergi2148-970X2018-12-0152201Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in TurkeyGülşah Aykaç0Esra Sert1Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık BölümüOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Bölümü<p class="FreeForm">This paper aims to discuss how “the discourse of creative labor” is being reproduced as an apparatus of exploitation in the architectural labor processes of twenty-first-century Turkey through “architect-workers.” The discourse of creative labor has deepened the exploitation of architect-workers, as all workers, and defines the very privileged position of architect-boss in relation to other laborers. This exploitation became visible both in Turkey and worldwide through the comments of architects—who are both bosses of their architecture firms and so-called <em>starchitects—</em>about their own positions and practices. In addition, twenty-first-century architecture in Turkey can be criticized for the increasing precarity that has stemmed from the processes of <em>yapsatçılık</em> and mega-projects. To cope with this exploitation, “the discourse of creative labor” can also be reproduced by architect-workers. Consequently, this paper aims to provide ground on which to problematize the architect-worker as a member of the working class, as well as in the context of a discourse on creative labor and its exploitative use in the labor processes of architecture.</p>http://www.momentjournal.org/index.php/momentdergi/article/view/355mimarlıkta emek süreçlerimimarlıkta yaratıcı emekmimar-işçitürkiye’de mimarlıkmimarlık eleştirisi
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gülşah Aykaç
Esra Sert
spellingShingle Gülşah Aykaç
Esra Sert
Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey
Momentdergi
mimarlıkta emek süreçleri
mimarlıkta yaratıcı emek
mimar-işçi
türkiye’de mimarlık
mimarlık eleştirisi
author_facet Gülşah Aykaç
Esra Sert
author_sort Gülşah Aykaç
title Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey
title_short Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey
title_full Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey
title_fullStr Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking the Labor Processes of Architecture in Turkey
title_sort rethinking the labor processes of architecture in turkey
publisher Hacettepe University
series Momentdergi
issn 2148-970X
publishDate 2018-12-01
description <p class="FreeForm">This paper aims to discuss how “the discourse of creative labor” is being reproduced as an apparatus of exploitation in the architectural labor processes of twenty-first-century Turkey through “architect-workers.” The discourse of creative labor has deepened the exploitation of architect-workers, as all workers, and defines the very privileged position of architect-boss in relation to other laborers. This exploitation became visible both in Turkey and worldwide through the comments of architects—who are both bosses of their architecture firms and so-called <em>starchitects—</em>about their own positions and practices. In addition, twenty-first-century architecture in Turkey can be criticized for the increasing precarity that has stemmed from the processes of <em>yapsatçılık</em> and mega-projects. To cope with this exploitation, “the discourse of creative labor” can also be reproduced by architect-workers. Consequently, this paper aims to provide ground on which to problematize the architect-worker as a member of the working class, as well as in the context of a discourse on creative labor and its exploitative use in the labor processes of architecture.</p>
topic mimarlıkta emek süreçleri
mimarlıkta yaratıcı emek
mimar-işçi
türkiye’de mimarlık
mimarlık eleştirisi
url http://www.momentjournal.org/index.php/momentdergi/article/view/355
work_keys_str_mv AT gulsahaykac rethinkingthelaborprocessesofarchitectureinturkey
AT esrasert rethinkingthelaborprocessesofarchitectureinturkey
_version_ 1724350927974957056