Ovarian tumor cases that were preoperatively diagnosed as benign but postoperatively confirmed as borderline or malignant after laparoscopic surgery

Objective: Laparoscopic surgery is the gold standard for benign ovarian tumors because of its overall improved quality of life (QOL). However, some tumors diagnosed preoperatively as benign may be proven to be malignant by postoperative studies. The standard approach for the removal of a malignant o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yasushi Kotani, Masahiko Umemoto, Takako Tobiume, Mitsuru Shiota
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-11-01
Series:Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221330701300097X
id doaj-301a5d23a7894c748f154ef179bd914b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-301a5d23a7894c748f154ef179bd914b2020-11-24T23:15:17ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsGynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy2213-30702013-11-012412212510.1016/j.gmit.2013.07.002Ovarian tumor cases that were preoperatively diagnosed as benign but postoperatively confirmed as borderline or malignant after laparoscopic surgeryYasushi KotaniMasahiko UmemotoTakako TobiumeMitsuru ShiotaObjective: Laparoscopic surgery is the gold standard for benign ovarian tumors because of its overall improved quality of life (QOL). However, some tumors diagnosed preoperatively as benign may be proven to be malignant by postoperative studies. The standard approach for the removal of a malignant ovarian tumor in our hospital is via laparotomy; however, there is no referential prognostic data on malignancies that are excised laparoscopically. To evaluate clinical and histological factors and prognosis, this study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgery in our hospital, based on a preoperative diagnosis of benignancy, but later postoperative testing proved their tumors to be borderline or malignant. Participants and methods: The study group comprised 1322 women who underwent a laparoscopic procedure in our hospital on the basis of a preoperative diagnosis of a benign ovarian tumor. The procedures were performed between 1995 and 2011. The rate of borderline and malignant cases, histology, and postoperative treatment were investigated. Results: Of the 1322 patients, 15 (1.1%) patients were postoperatively diagnosed as having a borderline malignancy with various histological types and all of these patients had a good prognosis; four (0.3%) patients were postoperatively diagnosed as having a malignant tumor with various histological types; of these patients, two patients required emergency surgery. All four patients underwent additional surgery and chemotherapy with no recurrence to date. Conclusion: Some tumors diagnosed preoperatively as benign proved postoperatively to be malignant. Appropriate postoperative treatment effectively improved the prognosis. Particular attention should be paid to a possible occult malignancy that may manifest postoperatively, especially in patients who underwent emergency surgery. We recommend preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, even for emergency cases, to improve preoperative diagnosis.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221330701300097XLaparoscopic surgeryMalignancyOvarian tumor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yasushi Kotani
Masahiko Umemoto
Takako Tobiume
Mitsuru Shiota
spellingShingle Yasushi Kotani
Masahiko Umemoto
Takako Tobiume
Mitsuru Shiota
Ovarian tumor cases that were preoperatively diagnosed as benign but postoperatively confirmed as borderline or malignant after laparoscopic surgery
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy
Laparoscopic surgery
Malignancy
Ovarian tumor
author_facet Yasushi Kotani
Masahiko Umemoto
Takako Tobiume
Mitsuru Shiota
author_sort Yasushi Kotani
title Ovarian tumor cases that were preoperatively diagnosed as benign but postoperatively confirmed as borderline or malignant after laparoscopic surgery
title_short Ovarian tumor cases that were preoperatively diagnosed as benign but postoperatively confirmed as borderline or malignant after laparoscopic surgery
title_full Ovarian tumor cases that were preoperatively diagnosed as benign but postoperatively confirmed as borderline or malignant after laparoscopic surgery
title_fullStr Ovarian tumor cases that were preoperatively diagnosed as benign but postoperatively confirmed as borderline or malignant after laparoscopic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Ovarian tumor cases that were preoperatively diagnosed as benign but postoperatively confirmed as borderline or malignant after laparoscopic surgery
title_sort ovarian tumor cases that were preoperatively diagnosed as benign but postoperatively confirmed as borderline or malignant after laparoscopic surgery
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy
issn 2213-3070
publishDate 2013-11-01
description Objective: Laparoscopic surgery is the gold standard for benign ovarian tumors because of its overall improved quality of life (QOL). However, some tumors diagnosed preoperatively as benign may be proven to be malignant by postoperative studies. The standard approach for the removal of a malignant ovarian tumor in our hospital is via laparotomy; however, there is no referential prognostic data on malignancies that are excised laparoscopically. To evaluate clinical and histological factors and prognosis, this study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgery in our hospital, based on a preoperative diagnosis of benignancy, but later postoperative testing proved their tumors to be borderline or malignant. Participants and methods: The study group comprised 1322 women who underwent a laparoscopic procedure in our hospital on the basis of a preoperative diagnosis of a benign ovarian tumor. The procedures were performed between 1995 and 2011. The rate of borderline and malignant cases, histology, and postoperative treatment were investigated. Results: Of the 1322 patients, 15 (1.1%) patients were postoperatively diagnosed as having a borderline malignancy with various histological types and all of these patients had a good prognosis; four (0.3%) patients were postoperatively diagnosed as having a malignant tumor with various histological types; of these patients, two patients required emergency surgery. All four patients underwent additional surgery and chemotherapy with no recurrence to date. Conclusion: Some tumors diagnosed preoperatively as benign proved postoperatively to be malignant. Appropriate postoperative treatment effectively improved the prognosis. Particular attention should be paid to a possible occult malignancy that may manifest postoperatively, especially in patients who underwent emergency surgery. We recommend preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, even for emergency cases, to improve preoperative diagnosis.
topic Laparoscopic surgery
Malignancy
Ovarian tumor
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221330701300097X
work_keys_str_mv AT yasushikotani ovariantumorcasesthatwerepreoperativelydiagnosedasbenignbutpostoperativelyconfirmedasborderlineormalignantafterlaparoscopicsurgery
AT masahikoumemoto ovariantumorcasesthatwerepreoperativelydiagnosedasbenignbutpostoperativelyconfirmedasborderlineormalignantafterlaparoscopicsurgery
AT takakotobiume ovariantumorcasesthatwerepreoperativelydiagnosedasbenignbutpostoperativelyconfirmedasborderlineormalignantafterlaparoscopicsurgery
AT mitsurushiota ovariantumorcasesthatwerepreoperativelydiagnosedasbenignbutpostoperativelyconfirmedasborderlineormalignantafterlaparoscopicsurgery
_version_ 1725591143651999744