Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward
This paper reviews the potential and barriers of demand-side mitigation options in the agricultural sector based on the recent academic literature and on a survey conducted on a sample of 788 respondents living in France. The mitigation potential of such measures as reducing losses in the food suppl...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Oilseeds and fats, crops and lipids |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2016051 |
id |
doaj-30179ceb5228403994293116604fcd50 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-30179ceb5228403994293116604fcd502021-02-02T04:06:52ZengEDP SciencesOilseeds and fats, crops and lipids2272-69772257-66142017-01-01241D10410.1051/ocl/2016051ocl160051sDemand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forwardBrunelle ThierryCoat MathildeViguié VincentThis paper reviews the potential and barriers of demand-side mitigation options in the agricultural sector based on the recent academic literature and on a survey conducted on a sample of 788 respondents living in France. The mitigation potential of such measures as reducing losses in the food supply chain and shifting diets toward less animal products is estimated to be particularly high, higher, in particular, than supply-side mitigation options. However, to ensure that these measures do not entail a reduction in protein intake, these estimations should consider both caloric and protein units, and take into account the digestibility differentials between protein sources. Our survey shows that people are relatively reluctant to eat more sustainably, preferring to reduce their emissions in other areas such as housing or equipment. This relative reluctance is mainly due to individual perceptions linked to health concerns, taste or habits. Some obstacles could easily be overcome through well-designed policies aiming to, for example, advertise a lower consumption of red meat for health benefits. National governments are, however, rather inactive on this topic, leaving the initiative to the civil society.https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2016051diet shiftmitigation of climate changefood wasteagriculture |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Brunelle Thierry Coat Mathilde Viguié Vincent |
spellingShingle |
Brunelle Thierry Coat Mathilde Viguié Vincent Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward Oilseeds and fats, crops and lipids diet shift mitigation of climate change food waste agriculture |
author_facet |
Brunelle Thierry Coat Mathilde Viguié Vincent |
author_sort |
Brunelle Thierry |
title |
Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward |
title_short |
Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward |
title_full |
Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward |
title_fullStr |
Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward |
title_full_unstemmed |
Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward |
title_sort |
demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
Oilseeds and fats, crops and lipids |
issn |
2272-6977 2257-6614 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
This paper reviews the potential and barriers of demand-side mitigation options in the agricultural sector based on the recent academic literature and on a survey conducted on a sample of 788 respondents living in France. The mitigation potential of such measures as reducing losses in the food supply chain and shifting diets toward less animal products is estimated to be particularly high, higher, in particular, than supply-side mitigation options. However, to ensure that these measures do not entail a reduction in protein intake, these estimations should consider both caloric and protein units, and take into account the digestibility differentials between protein sources. Our survey shows that people are relatively reluctant to eat more sustainably, preferring to reduce their emissions in other areas such as housing or equipment. This relative reluctance is mainly due to individual perceptions linked to health concerns, taste or habits. Some obstacles could easily be overcome through well-designed policies aiming to, for example, advertise a lower consumption of red meat for health benefits. National governments are, however, rather inactive on this topic, leaving the initiative to the civil society. |
topic |
diet shift mitigation of climate change food waste agriculture |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2016051 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT brunellethierry demandsidemitigationoptionsoftheagriculturalsectorpotentialbarriersandwaysforward AT coatmathilde demandsidemitigationoptionsoftheagriculturalsectorpotentialbarriersandwaysforward AT viguievincent demandsidemitigationoptionsoftheagriculturalsectorpotentialbarriersandwaysforward |
_version_ |
1724306407935705088 |