Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward

This paper reviews the potential and barriers of demand-side mitigation options in the agricultural sector based on the recent academic literature and on a survey conducted on a sample of 788 respondents living in France. The mitigation potential of such measures as reducing losses in the food suppl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brunelle Thierry, Coat Mathilde, Viguié Vincent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:Oilseeds and fats, crops and lipids
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2016051
id doaj-30179ceb5228403994293116604fcd50
record_format Article
spelling doaj-30179ceb5228403994293116604fcd502021-02-02T04:06:52ZengEDP SciencesOilseeds and fats, crops and lipids2272-69772257-66142017-01-01241D10410.1051/ocl/2016051ocl160051sDemand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forwardBrunelle ThierryCoat MathildeViguié VincentThis paper reviews the potential and barriers of demand-side mitigation options in the agricultural sector based on the recent academic literature and on a survey conducted on a sample of 788 respondents living in France. The mitigation potential of such measures as reducing losses in the food supply chain and shifting diets toward less animal products is estimated to be particularly high, higher, in particular, than supply-side mitigation options. However, to ensure that these measures do not entail a reduction in protein intake, these estimations should consider both caloric and protein units, and take into account the digestibility differentials between protein sources. Our survey shows that people are relatively reluctant to eat more sustainably, preferring to reduce their emissions in other areas such as housing or equipment. This relative reluctance is mainly due to individual perceptions linked to health concerns, taste or habits. Some obstacles could easily be overcome through well-designed policies aiming to, for example, advertise a lower consumption of red meat for health benefits. National governments are, however, rather inactive on this topic, leaving the initiative to the civil society.https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2016051diet shiftmitigation of climate changefood wasteagriculture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brunelle Thierry
Coat Mathilde
Viguié Vincent
spellingShingle Brunelle Thierry
Coat Mathilde
Viguié Vincent
Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward
Oilseeds and fats, crops and lipids
diet shift
mitigation of climate change
food waste
agriculture
author_facet Brunelle Thierry
Coat Mathilde
Viguié Vincent
author_sort Brunelle Thierry
title Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward
title_short Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward
title_full Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward
title_fullStr Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward
title_full_unstemmed Demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward
title_sort demand-side mitigation options of the agricultural sector: potential, barriers and ways forward
publisher EDP Sciences
series Oilseeds and fats, crops and lipids
issn 2272-6977
2257-6614
publishDate 2017-01-01
description This paper reviews the potential and barriers of demand-side mitigation options in the agricultural sector based on the recent academic literature and on a survey conducted on a sample of 788 respondents living in France. The mitigation potential of such measures as reducing losses in the food supply chain and shifting diets toward less animal products is estimated to be particularly high, higher, in particular, than supply-side mitigation options. However, to ensure that these measures do not entail a reduction in protein intake, these estimations should consider both caloric and protein units, and take into account the digestibility differentials between protein sources. Our survey shows that people are relatively reluctant to eat more sustainably, preferring to reduce their emissions in other areas such as housing or equipment. This relative reluctance is mainly due to individual perceptions linked to health concerns, taste or habits. Some obstacles could easily be overcome through well-designed policies aiming to, for example, advertise a lower consumption of red meat for health benefits. National governments are, however, rather inactive on this topic, leaving the initiative to the civil society.
topic diet shift
mitigation of climate change
food waste
agriculture
url https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2016051
work_keys_str_mv AT brunellethierry demandsidemitigationoptionsoftheagriculturalsectorpotentialbarriersandwaysforward
AT coatmathilde demandsidemitigationoptionsoftheagriculturalsectorpotentialbarriersandwaysforward
AT viguievincent demandsidemitigationoptionsoftheagriculturalsectorpotentialbarriersandwaysforward
_version_ 1724306407935705088