Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties?

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) represent a distinct class of proteins and are distinguished from globular proteins by conformational plasticity, high evolvability and a broad functional repertoire. Some of their properties are reminiscent of early proteins, but their abundance in eukaryote...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiří Vymětal, Jiří Vondrášek, Klára Hlouchová
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-07-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
IDP
IDR
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/7/654
id doaj-300fe72608f84950a6173823dbd6a36e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-300fe72608f84950a6173823dbd6a36e2020-11-24T22:09:32ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002019-07-0121765410.3390/e21070654e21070654Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties?Jiří Vymětal0Jiří Vondrášek1Klára Hlouchová2Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemitry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo náměstí 2, 166 10 Praha 6 Prague, Czech RepublicInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemitry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo náměstí 2, 166 10 Praha 6 Prague, Czech RepublicInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemitry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo náměstí 2, 166 10 Praha 6 Prague, Czech RepublicIntrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) represent a distinct class of proteins and are distinguished from globular proteins by conformational plasticity, high evolvability and a broad functional repertoire. Some of their properties are reminiscent of early proteins, but their abundance in eukaryotes, functional properties and compositional bias suggest that IDPs appeared at later evolutionary stages. The spectrum of IDP properties and their determinants are still not well defined. This study compares rudimentary physicochemical properties of IDPs and globular proteins using bioinformatic analysis on the level of their native sequences and random sequence permutations, addressing the contributions of composition versus sequence as determinants of the properties. IDPs have, on average, lower predicted secondary structure contents and aggregation propensities and biased amino acid compositions. However, our study shows that IDPs exhibit a broad range of these properties. Induced fold IDPs exhibit very similar compositions and secondary structure/aggregation propensities to globular proteins, and can be distinguished from unfoldable IDPs based on analysis of these sequence properties. While amino acid composition seems to be a major determinant of aggregation and secondary structure propensities, sequence randomization does not result in dramatic changes to these properties, but for both IDPs and globular proteins seems to fine-tune the tradeoff between folding and aggregation.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/7/654IDPIDRsequence randomizationsecondary structure predictionaggregation propensity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiří Vymětal
Jiří Vondrášek
Klára Hlouchová
spellingShingle Jiří Vymětal
Jiří Vondrášek
Klára Hlouchová
Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties?
Entropy
IDP
IDR
sequence randomization
secondary structure prediction
aggregation propensity
author_facet Jiří Vymětal
Jiří Vondrášek
Klára Hlouchová
author_sort Jiří Vymětal
title Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties?
title_short Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties?
title_full Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties?
title_fullStr Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties?
title_full_unstemmed Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties?
title_sort sequence versus composition: what prescribes idp biophysical properties?
publisher MDPI AG
series Entropy
issn 1099-4300
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) represent a distinct class of proteins and are distinguished from globular proteins by conformational plasticity, high evolvability and a broad functional repertoire. Some of their properties are reminiscent of early proteins, but their abundance in eukaryotes, functional properties and compositional bias suggest that IDPs appeared at later evolutionary stages. The spectrum of IDP properties and their determinants are still not well defined. This study compares rudimentary physicochemical properties of IDPs and globular proteins using bioinformatic analysis on the level of their native sequences and random sequence permutations, addressing the contributions of composition versus sequence as determinants of the properties. IDPs have, on average, lower predicted secondary structure contents and aggregation propensities and biased amino acid compositions. However, our study shows that IDPs exhibit a broad range of these properties. Induced fold IDPs exhibit very similar compositions and secondary structure/aggregation propensities to globular proteins, and can be distinguished from unfoldable IDPs based on analysis of these sequence properties. While amino acid composition seems to be a major determinant of aggregation and secondary structure propensities, sequence randomization does not result in dramatic changes to these properties, but for both IDPs and globular proteins seems to fine-tune the tradeoff between folding and aggregation.
topic IDP
IDR
sequence randomization
secondary structure prediction
aggregation propensity
url https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/7/654
work_keys_str_mv AT jirivymetal sequenceversuscompositionwhatprescribesidpbiophysicalproperties
AT jirivondrasek sequenceversuscompositionwhatprescribesidpbiophysicalproperties
AT klarahlouchova sequenceversuscompositionwhatprescribesidpbiophysicalproperties
_version_ 1725811379147898880