Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties?
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) represent a distinct class of proteins and are distinguished from globular proteins by conformational plasticity, high evolvability and a broad functional repertoire. Some of their properties are reminiscent of early proteins, but their abundance in eukaryote...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Entropy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/7/654 |
id |
doaj-300fe72608f84950a6173823dbd6a36e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-300fe72608f84950a6173823dbd6a36e2020-11-24T22:09:32ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002019-07-0121765410.3390/e21070654e21070654Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties?Jiří Vymětal0Jiří Vondrášek1Klára Hlouchová2Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemitry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo náměstí 2, 166 10 Praha 6 Prague, Czech RepublicInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemitry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo náměstí 2, 166 10 Praha 6 Prague, Czech RepublicInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemitry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo náměstí 2, 166 10 Praha 6 Prague, Czech RepublicIntrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) represent a distinct class of proteins and are distinguished from globular proteins by conformational plasticity, high evolvability and a broad functional repertoire. Some of their properties are reminiscent of early proteins, but their abundance in eukaryotes, functional properties and compositional bias suggest that IDPs appeared at later evolutionary stages. The spectrum of IDP properties and their determinants are still not well defined. This study compares rudimentary physicochemical properties of IDPs and globular proteins using bioinformatic analysis on the level of their native sequences and random sequence permutations, addressing the contributions of composition versus sequence as determinants of the properties. IDPs have, on average, lower predicted secondary structure contents and aggregation propensities and biased amino acid compositions. However, our study shows that IDPs exhibit a broad range of these properties. Induced fold IDPs exhibit very similar compositions and secondary structure/aggregation propensities to globular proteins, and can be distinguished from unfoldable IDPs based on analysis of these sequence properties. While amino acid composition seems to be a major determinant of aggregation and secondary structure propensities, sequence randomization does not result in dramatic changes to these properties, but for both IDPs and globular proteins seems to fine-tune the tradeoff between folding and aggregation.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/7/654IDPIDRsequence randomizationsecondary structure predictionaggregation propensity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jiří Vymětal Jiří Vondrášek Klára Hlouchová |
spellingShingle |
Jiří Vymětal Jiří Vondrášek Klára Hlouchová Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties? Entropy IDP IDR sequence randomization secondary structure prediction aggregation propensity |
author_facet |
Jiří Vymětal Jiří Vondrášek Klára Hlouchová |
author_sort |
Jiří Vymětal |
title |
Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties? |
title_short |
Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties? |
title_full |
Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties? |
title_fullStr |
Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sequence Versus Composition: What Prescribes IDP Biophysical Properties? |
title_sort |
sequence versus composition: what prescribes idp biophysical properties? |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Entropy |
issn |
1099-4300 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) represent a distinct class of proteins and are distinguished from globular proteins by conformational plasticity, high evolvability and a broad functional repertoire. Some of their properties are reminiscent of early proteins, but their abundance in eukaryotes, functional properties and compositional bias suggest that IDPs appeared at later evolutionary stages. The spectrum of IDP properties and their determinants are still not well defined. This study compares rudimentary physicochemical properties of IDPs and globular proteins using bioinformatic analysis on the level of their native sequences and random sequence permutations, addressing the contributions of composition versus sequence as determinants of the properties. IDPs have, on average, lower predicted secondary structure contents and aggregation propensities and biased amino acid compositions. However, our study shows that IDPs exhibit a broad range of these properties. Induced fold IDPs exhibit very similar compositions and secondary structure/aggregation propensities to globular proteins, and can be distinguished from unfoldable IDPs based on analysis of these sequence properties. While amino acid composition seems to be a major determinant of aggregation and secondary structure propensities, sequence randomization does not result in dramatic changes to these properties, but for both IDPs and globular proteins seems to fine-tune the tradeoff between folding and aggregation. |
topic |
IDP IDR sequence randomization secondary structure prediction aggregation propensity |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/7/654 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jirivymetal sequenceversuscompositionwhatprescribesidpbiophysicalproperties AT jirivondrasek sequenceversuscompositionwhatprescribesidpbiophysicalproperties AT klarahlouchova sequenceversuscompositionwhatprescribesidpbiophysicalproperties |
_version_ |
1725811379147898880 |