Five-year Experience with Perma Facial Implant

Summary: Augmentation cheiloplasty is becoming an increasingly popular aesthetic procedure despite current methodologies having met with disappointment among surgeons and patients. The goal of this study was to examine the benefits and drawbacks of 1 device in particular—Perma Facial Implant (PFI)....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Raphael, MD, Ryan Harris, BA, Scott W. Harris, MD, FACS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2014-05-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/Fulltext/2014/05000/Article.4.aspx
id doaj-2ff3343e6dbb4b2496036d481e46abff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2ff3343e6dbb4b2496036d481e46abff2020-11-24T23:39:51ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742014-05-0125e15310.1097/GOX.000000000000009101720096-201405000-00004Five-year Experience with Perma Facial ImplantPeter Raphael, MD0Ryan Harris, BA1Scott W. Harris, MD, FACS2From the American Institute for Plastic Surgery, Plano, Tex.;UT Southwestern, Dallas, Tex.From the American Institute for Plastic Surgery, Plano, Tex.;Summary: Augmentation cheiloplasty is becoming an increasingly popular aesthetic procedure despite current methodologies having met with disappointment among surgeons and patients. The goal of this study was to examine the benefits and drawbacks of 1 device in particular—Perma Facial Implant (PFI). The senior authors (P.R. and S.W.H.) performed 832 consecutive PFI lip augmentations with excellent results based on photographic documentation, patient satisfaction surveys, unbiased surgeon ratings, and low complication rates. In addition to augmenting thin lips, PFIs hide excess dentition and improve vermilion rhytids and pout. Contrary to alternatives, they are both permanent and reversible. However, they do not level out asymmetries or benefit razor-thin lips without prior lifting or mucosal advancement.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/Fulltext/2014/05000/Article.4.aspx
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Raphael, MD
Ryan Harris, BA
Scott W. Harris, MD, FACS
spellingShingle Peter Raphael, MD
Ryan Harris, BA
Scott W. Harris, MD, FACS
Five-year Experience with Perma Facial Implant
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
author_facet Peter Raphael, MD
Ryan Harris, BA
Scott W. Harris, MD, FACS
author_sort Peter Raphael, MD
title Five-year Experience with Perma Facial Implant
title_short Five-year Experience with Perma Facial Implant
title_full Five-year Experience with Perma Facial Implant
title_fullStr Five-year Experience with Perma Facial Implant
title_full_unstemmed Five-year Experience with Perma Facial Implant
title_sort five-year experience with perma facial implant
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
issn 2169-7574
publishDate 2014-05-01
description Summary: Augmentation cheiloplasty is becoming an increasingly popular aesthetic procedure despite current methodologies having met with disappointment among surgeons and patients. The goal of this study was to examine the benefits and drawbacks of 1 device in particular—Perma Facial Implant (PFI). The senior authors (P.R. and S.W.H.) performed 832 consecutive PFI lip augmentations with excellent results based on photographic documentation, patient satisfaction surveys, unbiased surgeon ratings, and low complication rates. In addition to augmenting thin lips, PFIs hide excess dentition and improve vermilion rhytids and pout. Contrary to alternatives, they are both permanent and reversible. However, they do not level out asymmetries or benefit razor-thin lips without prior lifting or mucosal advancement.
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/Fulltext/2014/05000/Article.4.aspx
work_keys_str_mv AT peterraphaelmd fiveyearexperiencewithpermafacialimplant
AT ryanharrisba fiveyearexperiencewithpermafacialimplant
AT scottwharrismdfacs fiveyearexperiencewithpermafacialimplant
_version_ 1725512091109949440