‘Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others’: The Hierarchy of Citizenship in Austria
While this article aims to explore the connections between citizenship and ‘race’, it is the first study to use fictional tools as a sociological resource in exemplifying the deviation between citizenship in principle and practice in an Austrian context. The study involves interv...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Laws |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/8/3/14 |
id |
doaj-2fb3fee5f9c74294bec4f98d5c7ec7ee |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2fb3fee5f9c74294bec4f98d5c7ec7ee2020-11-25T02:48:04ZengMDPI AGLaws2075-471X2019-07-01831410.3390/laws8030014laws8030014‘Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others’: The Hierarchy of Citizenship in AustriaSuleman Lazarus0School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Greenwich, Park Row, London SE10 9LS, UKWhile this article aims to explore the connections between citizenship and ‘race’, it is the first study to use fictional tools as a sociological resource in exemplifying the deviation between citizenship in principle and practice in an Austrian context. The study involves interviews with 73 Austrians from three ethnic/racial groups, which were subjected to a directed approach to qualitative content analysis and coded based on sentences from George Orwell’s fictional book, ‘Animal Farm’. By using fiction as a conceptual and analytical device, this article goes beyond the orthodox particulars of citizenship to expose the compressed entitlements of some racial/ethnic minorities. In particular, data analysis revealed two related and intertwined central themes: (a) “all animals are not equal or comrades”; and (b) “some animals are more equal than others”. All ‘animals’ may be equal in principle, whereas, in practice, their ‘race’ serves as a critical source of social (dis)advantage in the ‘animal kingdom’. Thus, since citizenship is a precondition for possessing certain rights that non-citizens are not granted, I argue that citizenship cannot only be judged by whom it, in theory, excludes (i.e., non-citizens), but also by how it treats the included (i.e., citizens) on the basis of their ‘race’. I conclude that skin colour is a specific aspect of the hierarchy of citizenship in Austria, which reinforces that ‘some animals are more equal than others’.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/8/3/14Austriacitizenshipfiction and social realitysocial citizenship‘race’ethnic groupsanimal farmracism in Austriainequalitiessocial hierarchy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Suleman Lazarus |
spellingShingle |
Suleman Lazarus ‘Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others’: The Hierarchy of Citizenship in Austria Laws Austria citizenship fiction and social reality social citizenship ‘race’ ethnic groups animal farm racism in Austria inequalities social hierarchy |
author_facet |
Suleman Lazarus |
author_sort |
Suleman Lazarus |
title |
‘Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others’: The Hierarchy of Citizenship in Austria |
title_short |
‘Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others’: The Hierarchy of Citizenship in Austria |
title_full |
‘Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others’: The Hierarchy of Citizenship in Austria |
title_fullStr |
‘Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others’: The Hierarchy of Citizenship in Austria |
title_full_unstemmed |
‘Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others’: The Hierarchy of Citizenship in Austria |
title_sort |
‘some animals are more equal than others’: the hierarchy of citizenship in austria |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Laws |
issn |
2075-471X |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
While this article aims to explore the connections between citizenship and ‘race’, it is the first study to use fictional tools as a sociological resource in exemplifying the deviation between citizenship in principle and practice in an Austrian context. The study involves interviews with 73 Austrians from three ethnic/racial groups, which were subjected to a directed approach to qualitative content analysis and coded based on sentences from George Orwell’s fictional book, ‘Animal Farm’. By using fiction as a conceptual and analytical device, this article goes beyond the orthodox particulars of citizenship to expose the compressed entitlements of some racial/ethnic minorities. In particular, data analysis revealed two related and intertwined central themes: (a) “all animals are not equal or comrades”; and (b) “some animals are more equal than others”. All ‘animals’ may be equal in principle, whereas, in practice, their ‘race’ serves as a critical source of social (dis)advantage in the ‘animal kingdom’. Thus, since citizenship is a precondition for possessing certain rights that non-citizens are not granted, I argue that citizenship cannot only be judged by whom it, in theory, excludes (i.e., non-citizens), but also by how it treats the included (i.e., citizens) on the basis of their ‘race’. I conclude that skin colour is a specific aspect of the hierarchy of citizenship in Austria, which reinforces that ‘some animals are more equal than others’. |
topic |
Austria citizenship fiction and social reality social citizenship ‘race’ ethnic groups animal farm racism in Austria inequalities social hierarchy |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/8/3/14 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sulemanlazarus someanimalsaremoreequalthanothersthehierarchyofcitizenshipinaustria |
_version_ |
1724750229815689216 |