Towards a mental health democracy
Introduction Despite advances in research and medical technology, between 76% and 85% of people with serious mental disorders had received no treatment in the previous year according to the world mental-health survey conducted by the WHO in 2011 (1). Still, nowhere in the world does mental health en...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
InterOPTICS
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience & Mental Health |
Online Access: | http://www.obrela-journal.gr/index.php/obrela/article/view/94 |
id |
doaj-2fb2eefa77174fbd9c6fde40c42f65d0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2fb2eefa77174fbd9c6fde40c42f65d02020-11-25T01:54:30ZengInterOPTICSDialogues in Clinical Neuroscience & Mental Health2585-27952018-11-011310.26386/obrela.v1i3.9494Towards a mental health democracyStelios StylianidisPanagiotis ChondrosKyriakos SouliotisIntroduction Despite advances in research and medical technology, between 76% and 85% of people with serious mental disorders had received no treatment in the previous year according to the world mental-health survey conducted by the WHO in 2011 (1). Still, nowhere in the world does mental health enjoy parity with physical health in national policies and budgets or in medical education and practice (2,3,4). Although WHO has stressed the importance of social determinants in health and mental health, public policies continue to neglect how poverty affects mental health, creates violence, social exclusion and breakdown of communities. As the Special Rapporteur to the UN on the right of everyone to enjoy the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health points out precisely “the crisis in mental health should be managed not as a crisis of individual conditions, but as a crisis of social obstacles, which hinders individual rights. Mental health policies should address the “power imbalance” rather than “chemical imbalance” (3:19). These obstacles are: • Dominance of the biomedical model • Power asymmetries • Biased use of evidence in mental healthhttp://www.obrela-journal.gr/index.php/obrela/article/view/94 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stelios Stylianidis Panagiotis Chondros Kyriakos Souliotis |
spellingShingle |
Stelios Stylianidis Panagiotis Chondros Kyriakos Souliotis Towards a mental health democracy Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience & Mental Health |
author_facet |
Stelios Stylianidis Panagiotis Chondros Kyriakos Souliotis |
author_sort |
Stelios Stylianidis |
title |
Towards a mental health democracy |
title_short |
Towards a mental health democracy |
title_full |
Towards a mental health democracy |
title_fullStr |
Towards a mental health democracy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Towards a mental health democracy |
title_sort |
towards a mental health democracy |
publisher |
InterOPTICS |
series |
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience & Mental Health |
issn |
2585-2795 |
publishDate |
2018-11-01 |
description |
Introduction
Despite advances in research and medical technology, between 76% and 85% of people with serious mental disorders had received no treatment in the previous year according to the world mental-health survey conducted by the WHO in 2011 (1). Still, nowhere in the world does mental health enjoy parity with physical health in national policies and budgets or in medical education and practice (2,3,4). Although WHO has stressed the importance of social determinants in health and mental health, public policies continue to neglect how poverty affects mental health, creates violence, social exclusion and breakdown of communities.
As the Special Rapporteur to the UN on the right of everyone to enjoy the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health points out precisely “the crisis in mental health should be managed not as a crisis of individual conditions, but as a crisis of social obstacles, which hinders individual rights. Mental health policies should address the “power imbalance” rather than “chemical imbalance” (3:19). These obstacles are:
• Dominance of the biomedical model
• Power asymmetries
• Biased use of evidence in mental health |
url |
http://www.obrela-journal.gr/index.php/obrela/article/view/94 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT steliosstylianidis towardsamentalhealthdemocracy AT panagiotischondros towardsamentalhealthdemocracy AT kyriakossouliotis towardsamentalhealthdemocracy |
_version_ |
1724987006709137408 |