Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcome of bipolar energy by using PlasmaKinetic™ cystoscope instruments in the treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two male patients with urethral stricture and five with bladder neck contracture were trea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erem K. Basok, Adnan Basaran, Cenk Gurbuz, Asif Yildirim, Resit Tokuc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2008-10-01
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500006
id doaj-2fadb430951c490faebbe0c6f473ae89
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2fadb430951c490faebbe0c6f473ae892020-11-24T22:02:20ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-55381677-61192008-10-0134557758610.1590/S1677-55382008000500006Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?Erem K. BasokAdnan BasaranCenk GurbuzAsif YildirimResit TokucOBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcome of bipolar energy by using PlasmaKinetic™ cystoscope instruments in the treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two male patients with urethral stricture and five with bladder neck contracture were treated by endoscopic bipolar vaporization. The most common etiology for stricture formation was iatrogenic (85.2%) and the mean stricture length was 12.2 mm. All patients were evaluated with urethrography and uroflowmetry one month and 3 months after surgery. Urethroscopy was routinely performed at the end of the first year. Preoperative mean maximum flow rate (Q max) was 4.9 mL/s for urethral stricture and mean Q max was 3.4 mL/s for bladder neck contracture. The results were considered as "successful” in patients where re-stenosis was not identified with both urethrography and urethroscopy. Minimum follow-up was 13.8 months (range 12 to 20). RESULTS: Tissue removal was rapid, bleeding was negligible and excellent visualization was maintained throughout the vaporization of the fibrotic tissue. Postoperative mean Q max was 14.9 mL/s and the success rate was 77.3% for urethral stricture at mean follow-up time of 14.2 months. The success rate was 60% with a mean follow-up time of 12.2 months for bladder neck contracture and the mean Q max was 16.2 mL/s, postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that bipolar vaporization is a safe, inexpensive and reliable procedure with good results, minimal surgical morbidity, negligible blood loss, and thus, it could be considered as a new therapeutic option for the endoscopic treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500006urethraurethral strictureendoscopyvaporizationbipolar energy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erem K. Basok
Adnan Basaran
Cenk Gurbuz
Asif Yildirim
Resit Tokuc
spellingShingle Erem K. Basok
Adnan Basaran
Cenk Gurbuz
Asif Yildirim
Resit Tokuc
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
urethra
urethral stricture
endoscopy
vaporization
bipolar energy
author_facet Erem K. Basok
Adnan Basaran
Cenk Gurbuz
Asif Yildirim
Resit Tokuc
author_sort Erem K. Basok
title Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?
title_short Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?
title_full Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?
title_fullStr Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?
title_full_unstemmed Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?
title_sort can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
issn 1677-5538
1677-6119
publishDate 2008-10-01
description OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcome of bipolar energy by using PlasmaKinetic™ cystoscope instruments in the treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two male patients with urethral stricture and five with bladder neck contracture were treated by endoscopic bipolar vaporization. The most common etiology for stricture formation was iatrogenic (85.2%) and the mean stricture length was 12.2 mm. All patients were evaluated with urethrography and uroflowmetry one month and 3 months after surgery. Urethroscopy was routinely performed at the end of the first year. Preoperative mean maximum flow rate (Q max) was 4.9 mL/s for urethral stricture and mean Q max was 3.4 mL/s for bladder neck contracture. The results were considered as "successful” in patients where re-stenosis was not identified with both urethrography and urethroscopy. Minimum follow-up was 13.8 months (range 12 to 20). RESULTS: Tissue removal was rapid, bleeding was negligible and excellent visualization was maintained throughout the vaporization of the fibrotic tissue. Postoperative mean Q max was 14.9 mL/s and the success rate was 77.3% for urethral stricture at mean follow-up time of 14.2 months. The success rate was 60% with a mean follow-up time of 12.2 months for bladder neck contracture and the mean Q max was 16.2 mL/s, postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that bipolar vaporization is a safe, inexpensive and reliable procedure with good results, minimal surgical morbidity, negligible blood loss, and thus, it could be considered as a new therapeutic option for the endoscopic treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture.
topic urethra
urethral stricture
endoscopy
vaporization
bipolar energy
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500006
work_keys_str_mv AT eremkbasok canbipolarvaporizationbeconsideredanalternativeenergysourceintheendoscopictreatmentofurethralstricturesandbladderneckcontracture
AT adnanbasaran canbipolarvaporizationbeconsideredanalternativeenergysourceintheendoscopictreatmentofurethralstricturesandbladderneckcontracture
AT cenkgurbuz canbipolarvaporizationbeconsideredanalternativeenergysourceintheendoscopictreatmentofurethralstricturesandbladderneckcontracture
AT asifyildirim canbipolarvaporizationbeconsideredanalternativeenergysourceintheendoscopictreatmentofurethralstricturesandbladderneckcontracture
AT resittokuc canbipolarvaporizationbeconsideredanalternativeenergysourceintheendoscopictreatmentofurethralstricturesandbladderneckcontracture
_version_ 1725836354224390144