Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcome of bipolar energy by using PlasmaKinetic™ cystoscope instruments in the treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two male patients with urethral stricture and five with bladder neck contracture were trea...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2008-10-01
|
Series: | International Brazilian Journal of Urology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500006 |
id |
doaj-2fadb430951c490faebbe0c6f473ae89 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2fadb430951c490faebbe0c6f473ae892020-11-24T22:02:20ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-55381677-61192008-10-0134557758610.1590/S1677-55382008000500006Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?Erem K. BasokAdnan BasaranCenk GurbuzAsif YildirimResit TokucOBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcome of bipolar energy by using PlasmaKinetic™ cystoscope instruments in the treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two male patients with urethral stricture and five with bladder neck contracture were treated by endoscopic bipolar vaporization. The most common etiology for stricture formation was iatrogenic (85.2%) and the mean stricture length was 12.2 mm. All patients were evaluated with urethrography and uroflowmetry one month and 3 months after surgery. Urethroscopy was routinely performed at the end of the first year. Preoperative mean maximum flow rate (Q max) was 4.9 mL/s for urethral stricture and mean Q max was 3.4 mL/s for bladder neck contracture. The results were considered as "successful” in patients where re-stenosis was not identified with both urethrography and urethroscopy. Minimum follow-up was 13.8 months (range 12 to 20). RESULTS: Tissue removal was rapid, bleeding was negligible and excellent visualization was maintained throughout the vaporization of the fibrotic tissue. Postoperative mean Q max was 14.9 mL/s and the success rate was 77.3% for urethral stricture at mean follow-up time of 14.2 months. The success rate was 60% with a mean follow-up time of 12.2 months for bladder neck contracture and the mean Q max was 16.2 mL/s, postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that bipolar vaporization is a safe, inexpensive and reliable procedure with good results, minimal surgical morbidity, negligible blood loss, and thus, it could be considered as a new therapeutic option for the endoscopic treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500006urethraurethral strictureendoscopyvaporizationbipolar energy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Erem K. Basok Adnan Basaran Cenk Gurbuz Asif Yildirim Resit Tokuc |
spellingShingle |
Erem K. Basok Adnan Basaran Cenk Gurbuz Asif Yildirim Resit Tokuc Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? International Brazilian Journal of Urology urethra urethral stricture endoscopy vaporization bipolar energy |
author_facet |
Erem K. Basok Adnan Basaran Cenk Gurbuz Asif Yildirim Resit Tokuc |
author_sort |
Erem K. Basok |
title |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
title_short |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
title_full |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
title_fullStr |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
title_sort |
can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
series |
International Brazilian Journal of Urology |
issn |
1677-5538 1677-6119 |
publishDate |
2008-10-01 |
description |
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcome of bipolar energy by using PlasmaKinetic™ cystoscope instruments in the treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two male patients with urethral stricture and five with bladder neck contracture were treated by endoscopic bipolar vaporization. The most common etiology for stricture formation was iatrogenic (85.2%) and the mean stricture length was 12.2 mm. All patients were evaluated with urethrography and uroflowmetry one month and 3 months after surgery. Urethroscopy was routinely performed at the end of the first year. Preoperative mean maximum flow rate (Q max) was 4.9 mL/s for urethral stricture and mean Q max was 3.4 mL/s for bladder neck contracture. The results were considered as "successful” in patients where re-stenosis was not identified with both urethrography and urethroscopy. Minimum follow-up was 13.8 months (range 12 to 20). RESULTS: Tissue removal was rapid, bleeding was negligible and excellent visualization was maintained throughout the vaporization of the fibrotic tissue. Postoperative mean Q max was 14.9 mL/s and the success rate was 77.3% for urethral stricture at mean follow-up time of 14.2 months. The success rate was 60% with a mean follow-up time of 12.2 months for bladder neck contracture and the mean Q max was 16.2 mL/s, postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that bipolar vaporization is a safe, inexpensive and reliable procedure with good results, minimal surgical morbidity, negligible blood loss, and thus, it could be considered as a new therapeutic option for the endoscopic treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture. |
topic |
urethra urethral stricture endoscopy vaporization bipolar energy |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500006 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eremkbasok canbipolarvaporizationbeconsideredanalternativeenergysourceintheendoscopictreatmentofurethralstricturesandbladderneckcontracture AT adnanbasaran canbipolarvaporizationbeconsideredanalternativeenergysourceintheendoscopictreatmentofurethralstricturesandbladderneckcontracture AT cenkgurbuz canbipolarvaporizationbeconsideredanalternativeenergysourceintheendoscopictreatmentofurethralstricturesandbladderneckcontracture AT asifyildirim canbipolarvaporizationbeconsideredanalternativeenergysourceintheendoscopictreatmentofurethralstricturesandbladderneckcontracture AT resittokuc canbipolarvaporizationbeconsideredanalternativeenergysourceintheendoscopictreatmentofurethralstricturesandbladderneckcontracture |
_version_ |
1725836354224390144 |