How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data

A major point of debate in the study of the Internet and politics is the extent to which social media platforms encourage citizens to inhabit online “bubbles” or “echo chambers,” exposed primarily to ideologically congenial political information. To investigate this question, we link a representativ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gregory Eady, Jonathan Nagler, Andy Guess, Jan Zilinsky, Joshua A. Tucker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-02-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832705
id doaj-2fa8fe7348ec4876afaf5d5d97b60ca0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2fa8fe7348ec4876afaf5d5d97b60ca02020-11-25T03:17:37ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402019-02-01910.1177/2158244019832705How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter DataGregory Eady0Jonathan Nagler1Andy Guess2Jan Zilinsky3Joshua A. Tucker4New York University, New York City, USANew York University, New York City, USAPrinceton University, NJ, USANew York University, New York City, USANew York University, New York City, USAA major point of debate in the study of the Internet and politics is the extent to which social media platforms encourage citizens to inhabit online “bubbles” or “echo chambers,” exposed primarily to ideologically congenial political information. To investigate this question, we link a representative survey of Americans with data from respondents’ public Twitter accounts ( N = 1,496). We then quantify the ideological distributions of users’ online political and media environments by merging validated estimates of user ideology with the full set of accounts followed by our survey respondents ( N = 642,345) and the available tweets posted by those accounts ( N ~ 1.2 billion). We study the extent to which liberals and conservatives encounter counter-attitudinal messages in two distinct ways: (a) by the accounts they follow and (b) by the tweets they receive from those accounts, either directly or indirectly (via retweets). More than a third of respondents do not follow any media sources, but among those who do, we find a substantial amount of overlap (51%) in the ideological distributions of accounts followed by users on opposite ends of the political spectrum. At the same time, however, we find asymmetries in individuals’ willingness to venture into cross-cutting spaces, with conservatives more likely to follow media and political accounts classified as left-leaning than the reverse. Finally, we argue that such choices are likely tempered by online news watching behavior.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832705
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gregory Eady
Jonathan Nagler
Andy Guess
Jan Zilinsky
Joshua A. Tucker
spellingShingle Gregory Eady
Jonathan Nagler
Andy Guess
Jan Zilinsky
Joshua A. Tucker
How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data
SAGE Open
author_facet Gregory Eady
Jonathan Nagler
Andy Guess
Jan Zilinsky
Joshua A. Tucker
author_sort Gregory Eady
title How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data
title_short How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data
title_full How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data
title_fullStr How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data
title_full_unstemmed How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data
title_sort how many people live in political bubbles on social media? evidence from linked survey and twitter data
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2019-02-01
description A major point of debate in the study of the Internet and politics is the extent to which social media platforms encourage citizens to inhabit online “bubbles” or “echo chambers,” exposed primarily to ideologically congenial political information. To investigate this question, we link a representative survey of Americans with data from respondents’ public Twitter accounts ( N = 1,496). We then quantify the ideological distributions of users’ online political and media environments by merging validated estimates of user ideology with the full set of accounts followed by our survey respondents ( N = 642,345) and the available tweets posted by those accounts ( N ~ 1.2 billion). We study the extent to which liberals and conservatives encounter counter-attitudinal messages in two distinct ways: (a) by the accounts they follow and (b) by the tweets they receive from those accounts, either directly or indirectly (via retweets). More than a third of respondents do not follow any media sources, but among those who do, we find a substantial amount of overlap (51%) in the ideological distributions of accounts followed by users on opposite ends of the political spectrum. At the same time, however, we find asymmetries in individuals’ willingness to venture into cross-cutting spaces, with conservatives more likely to follow media and political accounts classified as left-leaning than the reverse. Finally, we argue that such choices are likely tempered by online news watching behavior.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832705
work_keys_str_mv AT gregoryeady howmanypeopleliveinpoliticalbubblesonsocialmediaevidencefromlinkedsurveyandtwitterdata
AT jonathannagler howmanypeopleliveinpoliticalbubblesonsocialmediaevidencefromlinkedsurveyandtwitterdata
AT andyguess howmanypeopleliveinpoliticalbubblesonsocialmediaevidencefromlinkedsurveyandtwitterdata
AT janzilinsky howmanypeopleliveinpoliticalbubblesonsocialmediaevidencefromlinkedsurveyandtwitterdata
AT joshuaatucker howmanypeopleliveinpoliticalbubblesonsocialmediaevidencefromlinkedsurveyandtwitterdata
_version_ 1724630983448199168