"Was muss ich machen, wenn ich will, dass er das da macht?" Eine interpersonal orientierte Gesprächsanalyse von Experten/Laien-Kommunikation

This contribution argues for an investigation of expert/non-expert discourse in an interactive frame of references which accommodates the constitutive systems of text, interpersonal orientation and interaction. Depending on the interlocutors' communicative goals, references to these systems are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anita Fetzer
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Bern Open Publishing 2000-03-01
Series:Linguistik Online
Online Access:https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1018
id doaj-2f89fbd6e9664a769bf15e927442b019
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2f89fbd6e9664a769bf15e927442b0192021-09-13T12:59:15ZdeuBern Open PublishingLinguistik Online1615-30142000-03-015110.13092/lo.5.1018"Was muss ich machen, wenn ich will, dass er das da macht?" Eine interpersonal orientierte Gesprächsanalyse von Experten/Laien-KommunikationAnita FetzerThis contribution argues for an investigation of expert/non-expert discourse in an interactive frame of references which accommodates the constitutive systems of text, interpersonal orientation and interaction. Depending on the interlocutors' communicative goals, references to these systems are represented explicitly or implicitly. Part I presents a frame analysis of expert/non-expert discourse from both linguistic and social-context viewpoints. Here, special reference is given to the question of how the communication act plus/minus-validity claim accommodates expert/non-expert discourse. Part II presents a micro investigation of expert/non-expert discourse. It compares and contrasts written and spoken expert/non-expert discourse in the domain of institutional communication. The data stem from the field of computer-application discourse and are analysed with regard to the degree of explicitness of textual, interactional and interpersonal references. The results obtained are refined by the explicit accommodation of the variables intimacy and power. In conclusion, face-to-face expert/non-expert discourse is not only characterized by a high degree of explicitness of the textual system, i.e. the linguistic representation of expert knowledge, but also by a high degree of explicitness of the interpersonal and interactional systems. https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1018
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anita Fetzer
spellingShingle Anita Fetzer
"Was muss ich machen, wenn ich will, dass er das da macht?" Eine interpersonal orientierte Gesprächsanalyse von Experten/Laien-Kommunikation
Linguistik Online
author_facet Anita Fetzer
author_sort Anita Fetzer
title "Was muss ich machen, wenn ich will, dass er das da macht?" Eine interpersonal orientierte Gesprächsanalyse von Experten/Laien-Kommunikation
title_short "Was muss ich machen, wenn ich will, dass er das da macht?" Eine interpersonal orientierte Gesprächsanalyse von Experten/Laien-Kommunikation
title_full "Was muss ich machen, wenn ich will, dass er das da macht?" Eine interpersonal orientierte Gesprächsanalyse von Experten/Laien-Kommunikation
title_fullStr "Was muss ich machen, wenn ich will, dass er das da macht?" Eine interpersonal orientierte Gesprächsanalyse von Experten/Laien-Kommunikation
title_full_unstemmed "Was muss ich machen, wenn ich will, dass er das da macht?" Eine interpersonal orientierte Gesprächsanalyse von Experten/Laien-Kommunikation
title_sort "was muss ich machen, wenn ich will, dass er das da macht?" eine interpersonal orientierte gesprächsanalyse von experten/laien-kommunikation
publisher Bern Open Publishing
series Linguistik Online
issn 1615-3014
publishDate 2000-03-01
description This contribution argues for an investigation of expert/non-expert discourse in an interactive frame of references which accommodates the constitutive systems of text, interpersonal orientation and interaction. Depending on the interlocutors' communicative goals, references to these systems are represented explicitly or implicitly. Part I presents a frame analysis of expert/non-expert discourse from both linguistic and social-context viewpoints. Here, special reference is given to the question of how the communication act plus/minus-validity claim accommodates expert/non-expert discourse. Part II presents a micro investigation of expert/non-expert discourse. It compares and contrasts written and spoken expert/non-expert discourse in the domain of institutional communication. The data stem from the field of computer-application discourse and are analysed with regard to the degree of explicitness of textual, interactional and interpersonal references. The results obtained are refined by the explicit accommodation of the variables intimacy and power. In conclusion, face-to-face expert/non-expert discourse is not only characterized by a high degree of explicitness of the textual system, i.e. the linguistic representation of expert knowledge, but also by a high degree of explicitness of the interpersonal and interactional systems.
url https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1018
work_keys_str_mv AT anitafetzer wasmussichmachenwennichwilldasserdasdamachteineinterpersonalorientiertegesprachsanalysevonexpertenlaienkommunikation
_version_ 1717380639033917440