Electoral Behaviour in a European Union under Stress

Is electoral behaviour affected by the current challenges of the EU and, if it is, through which channels and mechanisms? This study offers a cross-national analysis together with a broad understanding of both the crisis phenomenon and electoral behaviour. To investigate this research question appro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniela Braun, Markus Tausendpfund
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2020-02-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2510
id doaj-2f72f3afdae640f985d1edf0d77a99a0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2f72f3afdae640f985d1edf0d77a99a02020-11-25T02:50:24ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632020-02-0181284010.17645/pag.v8i1.25101292Electoral Behaviour in a European Union under StressDaniela Braun0Markus Tausendpfund1Department of Political Science, LMU Munich, GermanyFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Hagen, GermanyIs electoral behaviour affected by the current challenges of the EU and, if it is, through which channels and mechanisms? This study offers a cross-national analysis together with a broad understanding of both the crisis phenomenon and electoral behaviour. To investigate this research question appropriately, we first distinguish at the most general level between the two main behavioural alternatives at play when it comes to electoral behaviour, namely abstention and vote choice. Second, and no less important, we differentiate between the mechanisms that mediate the relationship between the ‘EU under stress’ and electoral behaviour, namely egocentric and sociotropic economic voting motivations. Drawing on data from the European Election Study 2014, our article provides important insights into the study of electoral behaviour in an EU under stress. First, we are able to show that the multiple crises that have hit the EU have the potential to determine both turnout and the decision to vote for a Eurosceptic party. Second, different mechanisms are in play for each of the two behavioural alternatives: Turnout is clearly related to egocentric determinants and thus depends on individuals’ personal exposure to the financial crisis. Conversely, the decision to vote for a Eurosceptic party is based on a different mechanism. Voters—without necessarily being personally affected by the crisis—have a higher propensity to vote for a Eurosceptic party if they perceive their country to be threatened by such an EU under stress. These findings add to a better understanding of the EU’s multi-level democracy.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2510economic votingelectoral behavioureuropean criseseuropean parliament electionseurosceptic partiesmulti-level analysismulti-level system
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniela Braun
Markus Tausendpfund
spellingShingle Daniela Braun
Markus Tausendpfund
Electoral Behaviour in a European Union under Stress
Politics and Governance
economic voting
electoral behaviour
european crises
european parliament elections
eurosceptic parties
multi-level analysis
multi-level system
author_facet Daniela Braun
Markus Tausendpfund
author_sort Daniela Braun
title Electoral Behaviour in a European Union under Stress
title_short Electoral Behaviour in a European Union under Stress
title_full Electoral Behaviour in a European Union under Stress
title_fullStr Electoral Behaviour in a European Union under Stress
title_full_unstemmed Electoral Behaviour in a European Union under Stress
title_sort electoral behaviour in a european union under stress
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Is electoral behaviour affected by the current challenges of the EU and, if it is, through which channels and mechanisms? This study offers a cross-national analysis together with a broad understanding of both the crisis phenomenon and electoral behaviour. To investigate this research question appropriately, we first distinguish at the most general level between the two main behavioural alternatives at play when it comes to electoral behaviour, namely abstention and vote choice. Second, and no less important, we differentiate between the mechanisms that mediate the relationship between the ‘EU under stress’ and electoral behaviour, namely egocentric and sociotropic economic voting motivations. Drawing on data from the European Election Study 2014, our article provides important insights into the study of electoral behaviour in an EU under stress. First, we are able to show that the multiple crises that have hit the EU have the potential to determine both turnout and the decision to vote for a Eurosceptic party. Second, different mechanisms are in play for each of the two behavioural alternatives: Turnout is clearly related to egocentric determinants and thus depends on individuals’ personal exposure to the financial crisis. Conversely, the decision to vote for a Eurosceptic party is based on a different mechanism. Voters—without necessarily being personally affected by the crisis—have a higher propensity to vote for a Eurosceptic party if they perceive their country to be threatened by such an EU under stress. These findings add to a better understanding of the EU’s multi-level democracy.
topic economic voting
electoral behaviour
european crises
european parliament elections
eurosceptic parties
multi-level analysis
multi-level system
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2510
work_keys_str_mv AT danielabraun electoralbehaviourinaeuropeanunionunderstress
AT markustausendpfund electoralbehaviourinaeuropeanunionunderstress
_version_ 1724738790014058496