Industrial Productivity Divergence and Input-Output Network Structures: Evidence from Japan 1973–2012
Since the early 1990s, there have been larger and increasing labor productivity differences across industries in Japan. More specifically, a clear pattern of sigma and beta divergence across industries is observed. To shed light on these stylized facts, we first evaluate the input−output s...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Economies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/7/2/52 |
id |
doaj-2f66ff3ea7584ca7a0250a7b06185b15 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2f66ff3ea7584ca7a0250a7b06185b152020-11-24T20:57:57ZengMDPI AGEconomies2227-70992019-05-01725210.3390/economies7020052economies7020052Industrial Productivity Divergence and Input-Output Network Structures: Evidence from Japan 1973–2012Alvaro Domínguez0Carlos Mendez1Graduate School of Economics, Nagoya University, Aichi 464-8601, JapanGraduate School of International Development, Nagoya University, Aichi 464-8601, JapanSince the early 1990s, there have been larger and increasing labor productivity differences across industries in Japan. More specifically, a clear pattern of sigma and beta divergence across industries is observed. To shed light on these stylized facts, we first evaluate the input−output structure of Japan through the lens of a community-detection algorithm from network theory. Results from this analysis suggest the existence of two input−output network structures: a densely-connected group of industries (a stationary community), whose members remain in it throughout the period; and a group of industries (a transitional community) whose members do not belong to this first group. Next, we re-evaluate the industrial divergence pattern of Japan in the context of each network structure. Results suggest that divergence is mostly driven by the transitional community. Interestingly, since 2007, a pattern of sigma convergence started to re-appear only in the stationary community. We conclude suggesting that industrial divergence and instability in community membership are not necessarily indicative of low productivity performance.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/7/2/52communitiesinput-output networksproductivityconvergence analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alvaro Domínguez Carlos Mendez |
spellingShingle |
Alvaro Domínguez Carlos Mendez Industrial Productivity Divergence and Input-Output Network Structures: Evidence from Japan 1973–2012 Economies communities input-output networks productivity convergence analysis |
author_facet |
Alvaro Domínguez Carlos Mendez |
author_sort |
Alvaro Domínguez |
title |
Industrial Productivity Divergence and Input-Output Network Structures: Evidence from Japan 1973–2012 |
title_short |
Industrial Productivity Divergence and Input-Output Network Structures: Evidence from Japan 1973–2012 |
title_full |
Industrial Productivity Divergence and Input-Output Network Structures: Evidence from Japan 1973–2012 |
title_fullStr |
Industrial Productivity Divergence and Input-Output Network Structures: Evidence from Japan 1973–2012 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Industrial Productivity Divergence and Input-Output Network Structures: Evidence from Japan 1973–2012 |
title_sort |
industrial productivity divergence and input-output network structures: evidence from japan 1973–2012 |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Economies |
issn |
2227-7099 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
Since the early 1990s, there have been larger and increasing labor productivity differences across industries in Japan. More specifically, a clear pattern of sigma and beta divergence across industries is observed. To shed light on these stylized facts, we first evaluate the input−output structure of Japan through the lens of a community-detection algorithm from network theory. Results from this analysis suggest the existence of two input−output network structures: a densely-connected group of industries (a stationary community), whose members remain in it throughout the period; and a group of industries (a transitional community) whose members do not belong to this first group. Next, we re-evaluate the industrial divergence pattern of Japan in the context of each network structure. Results suggest that divergence is mostly driven by the transitional community. Interestingly, since 2007, a pattern of sigma convergence started to re-appear only in the stationary community. We conclude suggesting that industrial divergence and instability in community membership are not necessarily indicative of low productivity performance. |
topic |
communities input-output networks productivity convergence analysis |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/7/2/52 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alvarodominguez industrialproductivitydivergenceandinputoutputnetworkstructuresevidencefromjapan19732012 AT carlosmendez industrialproductivitydivergenceandinputoutputnetworkstructuresevidencefromjapan19732012 |
_version_ |
1716787089263034368 |