A practical and ethical solution to the opioid scheduling conundrum

Michael E Schatman,1 Beth D Darnall21Foundation for Ethics in Pain Care, Bellevue, WA, USA; 2Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USAAbuse-deterrent formulations (ADFs) of opioids have been in existence since the 1970s,1 with abuse-deterrent mechanisms in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schatman ME, Darnall BD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2013-12-01
Series:Journal of Pain Research
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/a-practical-and-ethical-solution-to-the-opioid-scheduling-conundrum-a15221
id doaj-2f53ea4cb40c42c1b5cfd9333533e4a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2f53ea4cb40c42c1b5cfd9333533e4a92020-11-24T20:49:49ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Pain Research1178-70902013-12-012014default13A practical and ethical solution to the opioid scheduling conundrumSchatman MEDarnall BDMichael E Schatman,1 Beth D Darnall21Foundation for Ethics in Pain Care, Bellevue, WA, USA; 2Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USAAbuse-deterrent formulations (ADFs) of opioids have been in existence since the 1970s,1 with abuse-deterrent mechanisms including physical barriers (eg, barriers to crushing), chemical additives such as opioid antagonists or irritants, and prodrugs that require conversion of the medication into their active forms in the gastrointestinal tract.2 A recent systematic review and meta-analysis3 found no difference between ADFs and non-ADFs in terms of efficacy or adverse events including nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, somnolence, constipation, and pruritus. Notably, the efficacy of ADFs in preventing abuse is not yet established, and therefore the authors could only comment on their "potential … to deter or resist some of the common forms of tampering associated with opioid misuse and abuse". While Turk et al2 have elucidated the complexity of producing high-quality research on the efficacy of ADFs to reduce opioid abuse, recent data are encouraging. For example, since Purdue Pharma’s (Stamford, CT, USA) voluntary reformulation of OxyContin® to an ADF in 2010, abuse of the medication has decreased significantly.4–6 As a specific example, National Poison Data System statistics indicated a 36% reduction in abuse exposure for OxyContin following ADF reformulation. Meanwhile, researchers for Purdue Pharma found an increase in abuse exposure for other single-entity oxycodone products and a 42% increase in abuse exposure for heroin during the same time frame.7 Although OxyContin has been the most investigated abuse deterrent formulation, ADFs of other opioids have demonstrated promise in preliminary investigations.8,9http://www.dovepress.com/a-practical-and-ethical-solution-to-the-opioid-scheduling-conundrum-a15221
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Schatman ME
Darnall BD
spellingShingle Schatman ME
Darnall BD
A practical and ethical solution to the opioid scheduling conundrum
Journal of Pain Research
author_facet Schatman ME
Darnall BD
author_sort Schatman ME
title A practical and ethical solution to the opioid scheduling conundrum
title_short A practical and ethical solution to the opioid scheduling conundrum
title_full A practical and ethical solution to the opioid scheduling conundrum
title_fullStr A practical and ethical solution to the opioid scheduling conundrum
title_full_unstemmed A practical and ethical solution to the opioid scheduling conundrum
title_sort practical and ethical solution to the opioid scheduling conundrum
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Journal of Pain Research
issn 1178-7090
publishDate 2013-12-01
description Michael E Schatman,1 Beth D Darnall21Foundation for Ethics in Pain Care, Bellevue, WA, USA; 2Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USAAbuse-deterrent formulations (ADFs) of opioids have been in existence since the 1970s,1 with abuse-deterrent mechanisms including physical barriers (eg, barriers to crushing), chemical additives such as opioid antagonists or irritants, and prodrugs that require conversion of the medication into their active forms in the gastrointestinal tract.2 A recent systematic review and meta-analysis3 found no difference between ADFs and non-ADFs in terms of efficacy or adverse events including nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, somnolence, constipation, and pruritus. Notably, the efficacy of ADFs in preventing abuse is not yet established, and therefore the authors could only comment on their "potential … to deter or resist some of the common forms of tampering associated with opioid misuse and abuse". While Turk et al2 have elucidated the complexity of producing high-quality research on the efficacy of ADFs to reduce opioid abuse, recent data are encouraging. For example, since Purdue Pharma’s (Stamford, CT, USA) voluntary reformulation of OxyContin® to an ADF in 2010, abuse of the medication has decreased significantly.4–6 As a specific example, National Poison Data System statistics indicated a 36% reduction in abuse exposure for OxyContin following ADF reformulation. Meanwhile, researchers for Purdue Pharma found an increase in abuse exposure for other single-entity oxycodone products and a 42% increase in abuse exposure for heroin during the same time frame.7 Although OxyContin has been the most investigated abuse deterrent formulation, ADFs of other opioids have demonstrated promise in preliminary investigations.8,9
url http://www.dovepress.com/a-practical-and-ethical-solution-to-the-opioid-scheduling-conundrum-a15221
work_keys_str_mv AT schatmanme apracticalandethicalsolutiontotheopioidschedulingconundrum
AT darnallbd apracticalandethicalsolutiontotheopioidschedulingconundrum
AT schatmanme practicalandethicalsolutiontotheopioidschedulingconundrum
AT darnallbd practicalandethicalsolutiontotheopioidschedulingconundrum
_version_ 1716805624010899456