Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis

Background. Long span is seen in many clinical situations. Treatmentplanning options of these cases are difficult and may require FPD, RPD or ISP. Each option has its own disadvantages, including mechanical problems, patient comfort and cost. This article will evaluate the stress distribution of a d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rami, Mirza, Mohammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2016-06-01
Series:Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dentistry.tbzmed.ac.ir/joddd/index.php/joddd/article/view/1827/505
id doaj-2f422958791a4af189ad4d07d541d696
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2f422958791a4af189ad4d07d541d6962020-11-25T00:20:24ZengTabriz University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects2008-210X2008-21182016-06-01102818610.15171/joddd.2016.013Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysisRami 0Mirza 1Mohammad 2Shurbaji MozayekAllafB. AbuharbBackground. Long span is seen in many clinical situations. Treatmentplanning options of these cases are difficult and may require FPD, RPD or ISP. Each option has its own disadvantages, including mechanical problems, patient comfort and cost. This article will evaluate the stress distribution of a different treatment option, which consists of adding a single supporting implant to the FPD by using 3D finite element analysis. Methods. Three models, each consisting of 5 units, were created as follows: 1. Tooth Pontic Pontic Pontic Tooth; 2. Tooth Pontic Implant Pontic Tooth; 3. Tooth Pontic Pontic Implant Tooth. An axial force was applied to the prostheses by using 3D finite element method and stresses were evaluated. Results. The maximum stress was found in the prostheses in all the models; the highest stress values in all the shared components of the models were almost similar. Stress in implants was lower in the second model than the third one. Conclusion. Adding a supporting implant in long-span FPD has no advantages while it has the disadvantages of complicating treatment and the complications that may occur to the implant and surrounding bone.http://dentistry.tbzmed.ac.ir/joddd/index.php/joddd/article/view/1827/505Finite element analysisfixed partial dentureimplant-supported dental prosthesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rami
Mirza
Mohammad
spellingShingle Rami
Mirza
Mohammad
Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis
Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
Finite element analysis
fixed partial denture
implant-supported dental prosthesis
author_facet Rami
Mirza
Mohammad
author_sort Rami
title Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis
title_short Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis
title_full Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis
title_sort efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3d finite element analysis
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
issn 2008-210X
2008-2118
publishDate 2016-06-01
description Background. Long span is seen in many clinical situations. Treatmentplanning options of these cases are difficult and may require FPD, RPD or ISP. Each option has its own disadvantages, including mechanical problems, patient comfort and cost. This article will evaluate the stress distribution of a different treatment option, which consists of adding a single supporting implant to the FPD by using 3D finite element analysis. Methods. Three models, each consisting of 5 units, were created as follows: 1. Tooth Pontic Pontic Pontic Tooth; 2. Tooth Pontic Implant Pontic Tooth; 3. Tooth Pontic Pontic Implant Tooth. An axial force was applied to the prostheses by using 3D finite element method and stresses were evaluated. Results. The maximum stress was found in the prostheses in all the models; the highest stress values in all the shared components of the models were almost similar. Stress in implants was lower in the second model than the third one. Conclusion. Adding a supporting implant in long-span FPD has no advantages while it has the disadvantages of complicating treatment and the complications that may occur to the implant and surrounding bone.
topic Finite element analysis
fixed partial denture
implant-supported dental prosthesis
url http://dentistry.tbzmed.ac.ir/joddd/index.php/joddd/article/view/1827/505
work_keys_str_mv AT rami efficacyofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturesa3dfiniteelementanalysis
AT mirza efficacyofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturesa3dfiniteelementanalysis
AT mohammad efficacyofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturesa3dfiniteelementanalysis
_version_ 1725367890336546816