Lying in Arthur Miller's The Crucible: A Pragmatic Study

Lying is a controversial issue as it is closely related to one's intended meaning to achieve certain pragmatic functions. The use of lying in literary works is closely related to the characters’ pragmatic functions as in the case of Miller's The Crucible where it is used as a deceptive co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hadeel Mahmoud Ibrahim, Juma’a Qadir Hussein
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: College of Education for Women 2021-09-01
Series:مجلة كلية التربية للبنات
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcoeduw.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/journal/article/view/1522
id doaj-2f15c0ed4b0f4a06959790454ec7972c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2f15c0ed4b0f4a06959790454ec7972c2021-09-28T14:05:28ZaraCollege of Education for Womenمجلة كلية التربية للبنات1680-87382663-547X2021-09-0132310.36231/coedw.v32i3.1522Lying in Arthur Miller's The Crucible: A Pragmatic StudyHadeel Mahmoud IbrahimJuma’a Qadir Hussein Lying is a controversial issue as it is closely related to one's intended meaning to achieve certain pragmatic functions. The use of lying in literary works is closely related to the characters’ pragmatic functions as in the case of Miller's The Crucible where it is used as a deceptive complex phenomenon that cannot be observed out of context. That is, the use of lying as a deceptive phenomenon represents a violation to Grices's Maxims. Thus, the study aims to qualitatively examine the kinds of maxims being violated, the kinds of violations conducted, the strategies followed in the violations, and the pragmatic functions behind such violations across the different categories of lies. To this end, the (30) extracts found in Miller's The Crucible have been all examined following Grice's (1975/1978) Cooperative Principle and Implicature theories. The analysis has revealed that the quality maxim was breached most of the time with a percentage of (96,6~97%), covert violation occupied (66,6~67%) (the same percentages of both prototypical lies and Intentional Deceptive Lies), fabrication was with (83%) and the pragmatic function ''to avoid punishment'' appears with (46,6~47%). This means that truthfulness was violated beside other maxims, and strategies of  fabrication. Such a violation enhances lying, and false-implicature, and intensifies the tragic end for most of the innocent characters. Minor lies are slightly concerned with plot development and events escalation. Finally, the characters lie in order to achieve certain pragmatic functions. However, the most dominant function adopted when lying was to avoid punishment. https://jcoeduw.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/journal/article/view/1522bald-faced lies, bullshitting, cooperative principle, Grice maxims, implicature, prototypical lies, self-deceptive lies
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hadeel Mahmoud Ibrahim
Juma’a Qadir Hussein
spellingShingle Hadeel Mahmoud Ibrahim
Juma’a Qadir Hussein
Lying in Arthur Miller's The Crucible: A Pragmatic Study
مجلة كلية التربية للبنات
bald-faced lies, bullshitting, cooperative principle, Grice maxims, implicature, prototypical lies, self-deceptive lies
author_facet Hadeel Mahmoud Ibrahim
Juma’a Qadir Hussein
author_sort Hadeel Mahmoud Ibrahim
title Lying in Arthur Miller's The Crucible: A Pragmatic Study
title_short Lying in Arthur Miller's The Crucible: A Pragmatic Study
title_full Lying in Arthur Miller's The Crucible: A Pragmatic Study
title_fullStr Lying in Arthur Miller's The Crucible: A Pragmatic Study
title_full_unstemmed Lying in Arthur Miller's The Crucible: A Pragmatic Study
title_sort lying in arthur miller's the crucible: a pragmatic study
publisher College of Education for Women
series مجلة كلية التربية للبنات
issn 1680-8738
2663-547X
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Lying is a controversial issue as it is closely related to one's intended meaning to achieve certain pragmatic functions. The use of lying in literary works is closely related to the characters’ pragmatic functions as in the case of Miller's The Crucible where it is used as a deceptive complex phenomenon that cannot be observed out of context. That is, the use of lying as a deceptive phenomenon represents a violation to Grices's Maxims. Thus, the study aims to qualitatively examine the kinds of maxims being violated, the kinds of violations conducted, the strategies followed in the violations, and the pragmatic functions behind such violations across the different categories of lies. To this end, the (30) extracts found in Miller's The Crucible have been all examined following Grice's (1975/1978) Cooperative Principle and Implicature theories. The analysis has revealed that the quality maxim was breached most of the time with a percentage of (96,6~97%), covert violation occupied (66,6~67%) (the same percentages of both prototypical lies and Intentional Deceptive Lies), fabrication was with (83%) and the pragmatic function ''to avoid punishment'' appears with (46,6~47%). This means that truthfulness was violated beside other maxims, and strategies of  fabrication. Such a violation enhances lying, and false-implicature, and intensifies the tragic end for most of the innocent characters. Minor lies are slightly concerned with plot development and events escalation. Finally, the characters lie in order to achieve certain pragmatic functions. However, the most dominant function adopted when lying was to avoid punishment.
topic bald-faced lies, bullshitting, cooperative principle, Grice maxims, implicature, prototypical lies, self-deceptive lies
url https://jcoeduw.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/journal/article/view/1522
work_keys_str_mv AT hadeelmahmoudibrahim lyinginarthurmillersthecrucibleapragmaticstudy
AT jumaaqadirhussein lyinginarthurmillersthecrucibleapragmaticstudy
_version_ 1716865929620488192