“So, it is about how negative it is?!” Understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positions

The article argues that interactions in qualitative interviews and ethnography can be analyzed as relations between intersectional social positions. It draws attention to the importance of class and geographical location in such analysis. It further argues that such interactions work through typific...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sune Qvotrup Jensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: State Library & Aalborg University 2012-09-01
Series:Qualitative Studies
Online Access:https://tidsskrift.dk/qual/article/view/7304
id doaj-2f13bbcd37df416c84224ff1a6a4f51c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2f13bbcd37df416c84224ff1a6a4f51c2020-11-25T00:28:33ZengState Library & Aalborg UniversityQualitative Studies 1903-70312012-09-01321151326457“So, it is about how negative it is?!” Understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positionsSune Qvotrup JensenThe article argues that interactions in qualitative interviews and ethnography can be analyzed as relations between intersectional social positions. It draws attention to the importance of class and geographical location in such analysis. It further argues that such interactions work through typifications, that they have a power dimension and that they entail processes of identity formation. The identities being offered through these processes can, however, be negotiated or resisted. The article then analyses such interactions as they were experienced in two research projects the author participated in: His PhD project about young marginalized ethnic minority men, and the collective project INTERLOC which focused on the interplay between gender, class, ethnicity and ‘race’ in an underprivileged Danish suburb. It is demonstrated that relationality influences the assumptions research participants have about the researcher. It is also demonstrated that the research encounter entails powerful mechanism of identity formation. The informants, however, sometimes resist these processes resulting in blurred and unstable, sometimes antagonistic, power relations. It is finally argued that analyses of such interactions can provide central insight into the subject studied.https://tidsskrift.dk/qual/article/view/7304
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sune Qvotrup Jensen
spellingShingle Sune Qvotrup Jensen
“So, it is about how negative it is?!” Understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positions
Qualitative Studies
author_facet Sune Qvotrup Jensen
author_sort Sune Qvotrup Jensen
title “So, it is about how negative it is?!” Understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positions
title_short “So, it is about how negative it is?!” Understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positions
title_full “So, it is about how negative it is?!” Understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positions
title_fullStr “So, it is about how negative it is?!” Understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positions
title_full_unstemmed “So, it is about how negative it is?!” Understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positions
title_sort “so, it is about how negative it is?!” understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positions
publisher State Library & Aalborg University
series Qualitative Studies
issn 1903-7031
publishDate 2012-09-01
description The article argues that interactions in qualitative interviews and ethnography can be analyzed as relations between intersectional social positions. It draws attention to the importance of class and geographical location in such analysis. It further argues that such interactions work through typifications, that they have a power dimension and that they entail processes of identity formation. The identities being offered through these processes can, however, be negotiated or resisted. The article then analyses such interactions as they were experienced in two research projects the author participated in: His PhD project about young marginalized ethnic minority men, and the collective project INTERLOC which focused on the interplay between gender, class, ethnicity and ‘race’ in an underprivileged Danish suburb. It is demonstrated that relationality influences the assumptions research participants have about the researcher. It is also demonstrated that the research encounter entails powerful mechanism of identity formation. The informants, however, sometimes resist these processes resulting in blurred and unstable, sometimes antagonistic, power relations. It is finally argued that analyses of such interactions can provide central insight into the subject studied.
url https://tidsskrift.dk/qual/article/view/7304
work_keys_str_mv AT suneqvotrupjensen soitisabouthownegativeitisunderstandingresearcherresearchedinteractionsasrelationsbetweenintersectionalsocialpositions
_version_ 1725335478448685056