Hate Speech in Online Polylogues

This research is the first attempt in Georgia to analyse hate speech emerging in Computer-Meditated Communication. Particular attention is paid to the polylogal, asynchronic remarks made by members of the public reacting to online newspaper articles or press releases concerning the LGPT pride event...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manana Rusieshvili-Cartledge, Rusudan Dolidze
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences 2021-02-01
Series:FLEKS: Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice
Online Access:https://humanrer.org/index.php/fleks/article/view/4171
id doaj-2f03697b1e414b70ab5535937e4571dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2f03697b1e414b70ab5535937e4571dd2021-02-16T13:03:31ZengOslo and Akershus University College of Applied SciencesFLEKS: Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice1894-59882021-02-0171Hate Speech in Online PolyloguesManana Rusieshvili-Cartledge0Rusudan Dolidze1Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State UniversityIv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University This research is the first attempt in Georgia to analyse hate speech emerging in Computer-Meditated Communication. Particular attention is paid to the polylogal, asynchronic remarks made by members of the public reacting to online newspaper articles or press releases concerning the LGPT pride event planned for 18 - 23 June 2019, in Tbilisi, Georgia. The methodology is based on combining methods utilized in CDA and Genre Approach to (im)politeness which is in accord with the general approach to CMDA . At the first stage of the analysis, the examples of hate-speech acts were analysed according to the following criteria: identification of linguistic means and strategies employed while expressing impoliteness and specificity of identity construction (self-asserted versus others -asserted, positive versus negative, roles of participants and strategies of conflict generation or management). Next, linguistic peculiarities of hate speech (for instance, linguistic triggers [threats, insults, sarcasm incitements], wordplay, taboo, swear and derogatory words, metaphors, allusions and similes) were identified and analysed. Quantitative methodology was employed while stating the number of proponents and opponents of the event as well as statistical data referring to the number of linguistic and politeness strategies employed while expressing an opinion. This research shows particular tendencies of how impoliteness can be realised and how social identities can be construed using the example of hate discourse concerning LGBT pride in Georgia. However, to fully explore the genre properties of hate discourse in Georgia further research based on examples of hate-discourse strategies applied when discussing ethnic minorities and gender roles, is needed. https://humanrer.org/index.php/fleks/article/view/4171
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manana Rusieshvili-Cartledge
Rusudan Dolidze
spellingShingle Manana Rusieshvili-Cartledge
Rusudan Dolidze
Hate Speech in Online Polylogues
FLEKS: Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice
author_facet Manana Rusieshvili-Cartledge
Rusudan Dolidze
author_sort Manana Rusieshvili-Cartledge
title Hate Speech in Online Polylogues
title_short Hate Speech in Online Polylogues
title_full Hate Speech in Online Polylogues
title_fullStr Hate Speech in Online Polylogues
title_full_unstemmed Hate Speech in Online Polylogues
title_sort hate speech in online polylogues
publisher Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences
series FLEKS: Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice
issn 1894-5988
publishDate 2021-02-01
description This research is the first attempt in Georgia to analyse hate speech emerging in Computer-Meditated Communication. Particular attention is paid to the polylogal, asynchronic remarks made by members of the public reacting to online newspaper articles or press releases concerning the LGPT pride event planned for 18 - 23 June 2019, in Tbilisi, Georgia. The methodology is based on combining methods utilized in CDA and Genre Approach to (im)politeness which is in accord with the general approach to CMDA . At the first stage of the analysis, the examples of hate-speech acts were analysed according to the following criteria: identification of linguistic means and strategies employed while expressing impoliteness and specificity of identity construction (self-asserted versus others -asserted, positive versus negative, roles of participants and strategies of conflict generation or management). Next, linguistic peculiarities of hate speech (for instance, linguistic triggers [threats, insults, sarcasm incitements], wordplay, taboo, swear and derogatory words, metaphors, allusions and similes) were identified and analysed. Quantitative methodology was employed while stating the number of proponents and opponents of the event as well as statistical data referring to the number of linguistic and politeness strategies employed while expressing an opinion. This research shows particular tendencies of how impoliteness can be realised and how social identities can be construed using the example of hate discourse concerning LGBT pride in Georgia. However, to fully explore the genre properties of hate discourse in Georgia further research based on examples of hate-discourse strategies applied when discussing ethnic minorities and gender roles, is needed.
url https://humanrer.org/index.php/fleks/article/view/4171
work_keys_str_mv AT mananarusieshvilicartledge hatespeechinonlinepolylogues
AT rusudandolidze hatespeechinonlinepolylogues
_version_ 1724267524517789696