A POSSIBLE NEW AUXILIARY UNIT IDENTIFICATION AT POROLISSUM?

The author is reopening the file of an enigmatic tile-stamp found in the Roman fort at Porolissum and in the neighbor one at Romita. He is challenging the old proposed reading <em>c(o)horti(s) I(primae) I(turaeorum) (milliariae</em>) with <em>c(o)h(ortis) S(agittariorum) I(primae)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Coriolan Horatiu Opreanu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mega Publishing House 2019-12-01
Series:Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jaha.org.ro/index.php/JAHA/article/view/473
Description
Summary:The author is reopening the file of an enigmatic tile-stamp found in the Roman fort at Porolissum and in the neighbor one at Romita. He is challenging the old proposed reading <em>c(o)horti(s) I(primae) I(turaeorum) (milliariae</em>) with <em>c(o)h(ortis) S(agittariorum) I(primae) (milliariae), </em>which can be the same with <em>cohors I milliaria sagittariorum</em> attested by late 1<sup>st</sup> century AD military diplomas in Judeea and with no later records in other provinces, or with <em>cohors I sagittariorum milliaria </em>first time attested at Tibiscum in Upper Dacia in AD 165. The chronology of two tile-stamps found at Porolissum in precise archaeological contexts, as well as the one from Romita is in Hadrian-Antoninus Pius time when the unit worked to the building of the stone buildings from the interior of the two forts, belonging to the first stone phase of the forts. As no official inscription of the unit survived, it was probably a unit brought from other province to participate to the huge effort of building the northern frontier defenses of Dacia, together with detachments of legio VII Gemina Felix, legio III Gallica, or cohors III all attested only by tile-stamps at Porolissum.
ISSN:2360-266X