Geography, international trade and institutions: an econometric analysis of the BRICS

This paper discusses the role of the three deep determinants of economic development (geography, institutions and international trade) in BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) from 1995 to 2015. First of all, we argue that it is difficult to point out whether or not the det...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos Schonerwald, Luiz Michelon, Marcelo Corrêa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Graduate Programme in International Strategic Studies (PPGEEI) 2020-03-01
Series:Revista Conjuntura Austral
Subjects:
Online Access:https://seer.ufrgs.br/ConjunturaAustral/article/view/96612
id doaj-2ed7f796604344eabc351ef871ecaf57
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2ed7f796604344eabc351ef871ecaf572020-11-25T03:48:01ZengGraduate Programme in International Strategic Studies (PPGEEI)Revista Conjuntura Austral2178-88392020-03-011153284710.22456/2178-8839.9661243302Geography, international trade and institutions: an econometric analysis of the BRICSCarlos Schonerwald0Luiz Michelon1Marcelo Corrêa2Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulThis paper discusses the role of the three deep determinants of economic development (geography, institutions and international trade) in BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) from 1995 to 2015. First of all, we argue that it is difficult to point out whether or not the determinants work simultaneously, since most authors do not agree with the idea of coordination. Secondly, we raise the viewpoint that institutions are very different among these nations, especially in the case of China, which has improved per capita income without fitting in the standards of the Worldwide Governance Indicators. Third, we briefly present the recent history of the bloc and apply the Hausman and Taylor (1981) method to controls for endogenous as well as time-invariant variables. We conclude that, on the one hand, geography and international trade have been important to explain the economic performance of BRICS countries without challenging the mainstream literature; on the other hand, the influence of institutions, even though relevant, does not correspond with the hypotheses rooted in the literature. China and Russia are countries with particular institutions, so the outcomes do not follow previous results about the role of institutions, suggesting that indicators may be biased toward liberal ideology.https://seer.ufrgs.br/ConjunturaAustral/article/view/96612instituições, comércio internacional, geografia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carlos Schonerwald
Luiz Michelon
Marcelo Corrêa
spellingShingle Carlos Schonerwald
Luiz Michelon
Marcelo Corrêa
Geography, international trade and institutions: an econometric analysis of the BRICS
Revista Conjuntura Austral
instituições, comércio internacional, geografia
author_facet Carlos Schonerwald
Luiz Michelon
Marcelo Corrêa
author_sort Carlos Schonerwald
title Geography, international trade and institutions: an econometric analysis of the BRICS
title_short Geography, international trade and institutions: an econometric analysis of the BRICS
title_full Geography, international trade and institutions: an econometric analysis of the BRICS
title_fullStr Geography, international trade and institutions: an econometric analysis of the BRICS
title_full_unstemmed Geography, international trade and institutions: an econometric analysis of the BRICS
title_sort geography, international trade and institutions: an econometric analysis of the brics
publisher Graduate Programme in International Strategic Studies (PPGEEI)
series Revista Conjuntura Austral
issn 2178-8839
publishDate 2020-03-01
description This paper discusses the role of the three deep determinants of economic development (geography, institutions and international trade) in BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) from 1995 to 2015. First of all, we argue that it is difficult to point out whether or not the determinants work simultaneously, since most authors do not agree with the idea of coordination. Secondly, we raise the viewpoint that institutions are very different among these nations, especially in the case of China, which has improved per capita income without fitting in the standards of the Worldwide Governance Indicators. Third, we briefly present the recent history of the bloc and apply the Hausman and Taylor (1981) method to controls for endogenous as well as time-invariant variables. We conclude that, on the one hand, geography and international trade have been important to explain the economic performance of BRICS countries without challenging the mainstream literature; on the other hand, the influence of institutions, even though relevant, does not correspond with the hypotheses rooted in the literature. China and Russia are countries with particular institutions, so the outcomes do not follow previous results about the role of institutions, suggesting that indicators may be biased toward liberal ideology.
topic instituições, comércio internacional, geografia
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/ConjunturaAustral/article/view/96612
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosschonerwald geographyinternationaltradeandinstitutionsaneconometricanalysisofthebrics
AT luizmichelon geographyinternationaltradeandinstitutionsaneconometricanalysisofthebrics
AT marcelocorrea geographyinternationaltradeandinstitutionsaneconometricanalysisofthebrics
_version_ 1724500787860602880