Internalization of Mastery Goals: The Differential Effect of Teachers’ Autonomy Support and Control

Two linked studies explored whether students’ perceptions differentiate between teachers’ autonomy support and control when presenting mastery goals, and the outcomes of these two practices, in terms of students’ internalization of mastery goals and their behavioral engagement. In two phases, Study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moti Benita, Lennia Matos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.599303/full
id doaj-2ed0e8d78a6d48ba8d13b2c36e99d9be
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2ed0e8d78a6d48ba8d13b2c36e99d9be2021-02-05T04:44:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-02-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.599303599303Internalization of Mastery Goals: The Differential Effect of Teachers’ Autonomy Support and ControlMoti Benita0Lennia Matos1Department of Education, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, IsraelDepartment of Psychology, Ponifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, PeruTwo linked studies explored whether students’ perceptions differentiate between teachers’ autonomy support and control when presenting mastery goals, and the outcomes of these two practices, in terms of students’ internalization of mastery goals and their behavioral engagement. In two phases, Study 1 (N = 317) sought to validate a new instrument assessing students’ perceptions of teachers’ autonomy support and control when presenting mastery goals. Study 2 (N = 1,331) demonstrated that at both within- and between-classroom levels, perceptions of teachers’ autonomy support for mastery goals were related to students’ mastery goals’ endorsement and behavioral engagement. These relations were mediated by students’ autonomous reasons to pursue learning activities. Perceptions of teachers’ control predicted disengagement through controlled reasons for learning, but only at the within-classroom level. This research joins a growing body of work demonstrating that combining achievement goal theory with SDT can further our understanding of the underpinnings of achievement motivation. It suggests that if teachers want their students to endorse mastery goals (and be more engaged), they need to use more autonomy supportive practices and less controlling ones.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.599303/fullmastery goalsgoal-complexautonomy supportive teachingcontrolling teachingengagementbehavioral engagement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Moti Benita
Lennia Matos
spellingShingle Moti Benita
Lennia Matos
Internalization of Mastery Goals: The Differential Effect of Teachers’ Autonomy Support and Control
Frontiers in Psychology
mastery goals
goal-complex
autonomy supportive teaching
controlling teaching
engagement
behavioral engagement
author_facet Moti Benita
Lennia Matos
author_sort Moti Benita
title Internalization of Mastery Goals: The Differential Effect of Teachers’ Autonomy Support and Control
title_short Internalization of Mastery Goals: The Differential Effect of Teachers’ Autonomy Support and Control
title_full Internalization of Mastery Goals: The Differential Effect of Teachers’ Autonomy Support and Control
title_fullStr Internalization of Mastery Goals: The Differential Effect of Teachers’ Autonomy Support and Control
title_full_unstemmed Internalization of Mastery Goals: The Differential Effect of Teachers’ Autonomy Support and Control
title_sort internalization of mastery goals: the differential effect of teachers’ autonomy support and control
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Two linked studies explored whether students’ perceptions differentiate between teachers’ autonomy support and control when presenting mastery goals, and the outcomes of these two practices, in terms of students’ internalization of mastery goals and their behavioral engagement. In two phases, Study 1 (N = 317) sought to validate a new instrument assessing students’ perceptions of teachers’ autonomy support and control when presenting mastery goals. Study 2 (N = 1,331) demonstrated that at both within- and between-classroom levels, perceptions of teachers’ autonomy support for mastery goals were related to students’ mastery goals’ endorsement and behavioral engagement. These relations were mediated by students’ autonomous reasons to pursue learning activities. Perceptions of teachers’ control predicted disengagement through controlled reasons for learning, but only at the within-classroom level. This research joins a growing body of work demonstrating that combining achievement goal theory with SDT can further our understanding of the underpinnings of achievement motivation. It suggests that if teachers want their students to endorse mastery goals (and be more engaged), they need to use more autonomy supportive practices and less controlling ones.
topic mastery goals
goal-complex
autonomy supportive teaching
controlling teaching
engagement
behavioral engagement
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.599303/full
work_keys_str_mv AT motibenita internalizationofmasterygoalsthedifferentialeffectofteachersautonomysupportandcontrol
AT lenniamatos internalizationofmasterygoalsthedifferentialeffectofteachersautonomysupportandcontrol
_version_ 1724284189234167808