Evaluation of Point Hyperspectral Reflectance and Multivariate Regression Models for Grapevine Water Status Estimation

Monitoring and management of plant water status over the critical period between flowering and veraison, plays a significant role in producing grapes of premium quality. Hyperspectral spectroscopy has been widely studied in precision farming, including for the prediction of grapevine water status. H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hsiang-En Wei, Miles Grafton, Michael Bretherton, Matthew Irwin, Eduardo Sandoval
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3198
id doaj-2ec0971fcdc14560b58c15e3f1c645ff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2ec0971fcdc14560b58c15e3f1c645ff2021-08-26T14:17:36ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922021-08-01133198319810.3390/rs13163198Evaluation of Point Hyperspectral Reflectance and Multivariate Regression Models for Grapevine Water Status EstimationHsiang-En Wei0Miles Grafton1Michael Bretherton2Matthew Irwin3Eduardo Sandoval4School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New ZealandSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New ZealandSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New ZealandSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New ZealandAgriFood Digital Lab, School of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New ZealandMonitoring and management of plant water status over the critical period between flowering and veraison, plays a significant role in producing grapes of premium quality. Hyperspectral spectroscopy has been widely studied in precision farming, including for the prediction of grapevine water status. However, these studies were presented based on various combinations of transformed spectral data, feature selection methods, and regression models. To evaluate the performance of different modeling pipelines for estimating grapevine water status, a study spanning the critical period was carried out in two commercial vineyards at Martinborough, New Zealand. The modeling used six hyperspectral data groups (raw reflectance, first derivative reflectance, second derivative reflectance, continuum removal variables, simple ratio indices, and vegetation indices), two variable selection methods (Spearman correlation and recursive feature elimination based on cross-validation), an ensemble of selected variables, and three regression models (partial least squares regression, random forest regression, and support vector regression). Stem water potential (used as a proxy for vine water status) was measured by a pressure bomb. Hyperspectral reflectance was undertaken by a handheld spectroradiometer. The results show that the best predictive performance was achieved by applying partial least squares regression to simple ratio indices (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.85; RMSE = 110 kPa). Models trained with an ensemble of selected variables comprising multicombination of transformed data and variable selection approaches outperformed those fitted using single combinations. Although larger data sizes are needed for further testing, this study compares 38 modeling pipelines and presents the best combination of procedures for estimating vine water status. This may lead to the provision of rapid estimation of vine water status in a nondestructive manner and highlights the possibility of applying hyperspectral data to precision irrigation in vineyards.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3198hyperspectralgrapevine water statusderivativecontinuum removalpartial least squares regressionrandom forest regression
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hsiang-En Wei
Miles Grafton
Michael Bretherton
Matthew Irwin
Eduardo Sandoval
spellingShingle Hsiang-En Wei
Miles Grafton
Michael Bretherton
Matthew Irwin
Eduardo Sandoval
Evaluation of Point Hyperspectral Reflectance and Multivariate Regression Models for Grapevine Water Status Estimation
Remote Sensing
hyperspectral
grapevine water status
derivative
continuum removal
partial least squares regression
random forest regression
author_facet Hsiang-En Wei
Miles Grafton
Michael Bretherton
Matthew Irwin
Eduardo Sandoval
author_sort Hsiang-En Wei
title Evaluation of Point Hyperspectral Reflectance and Multivariate Regression Models for Grapevine Water Status Estimation
title_short Evaluation of Point Hyperspectral Reflectance and Multivariate Regression Models for Grapevine Water Status Estimation
title_full Evaluation of Point Hyperspectral Reflectance and Multivariate Regression Models for Grapevine Water Status Estimation
title_fullStr Evaluation of Point Hyperspectral Reflectance and Multivariate Regression Models for Grapevine Water Status Estimation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Point Hyperspectral Reflectance and Multivariate Regression Models for Grapevine Water Status Estimation
title_sort evaluation of point hyperspectral reflectance and multivariate regression models for grapevine water status estimation
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Monitoring and management of plant water status over the critical period between flowering and veraison, plays a significant role in producing grapes of premium quality. Hyperspectral spectroscopy has been widely studied in precision farming, including for the prediction of grapevine water status. However, these studies were presented based on various combinations of transformed spectral data, feature selection methods, and regression models. To evaluate the performance of different modeling pipelines for estimating grapevine water status, a study spanning the critical period was carried out in two commercial vineyards at Martinborough, New Zealand. The modeling used six hyperspectral data groups (raw reflectance, first derivative reflectance, second derivative reflectance, continuum removal variables, simple ratio indices, and vegetation indices), two variable selection methods (Spearman correlation and recursive feature elimination based on cross-validation), an ensemble of selected variables, and three regression models (partial least squares regression, random forest regression, and support vector regression). Stem water potential (used as a proxy for vine water status) was measured by a pressure bomb. Hyperspectral reflectance was undertaken by a handheld spectroradiometer. The results show that the best predictive performance was achieved by applying partial least squares regression to simple ratio indices (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.85; RMSE = 110 kPa). Models trained with an ensemble of selected variables comprising multicombination of transformed data and variable selection approaches outperformed those fitted using single combinations. Although larger data sizes are needed for further testing, this study compares 38 modeling pipelines and presents the best combination of procedures for estimating vine water status. This may lead to the provision of rapid estimation of vine water status in a nondestructive manner and highlights the possibility of applying hyperspectral data to precision irrigation in vineyards.
topic hyperspectral
grapevine water status
derivative
continuum removal
partial least squares regression
random forest regression
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3198
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiangenwei evaluationofpointhyperspectralreflectanceandmultivariateregressionmodelsforgrapevinewaterstatusestimation
AT milesgrafton evaluationofpointhyperspectralreflectanceandmultivariateregressionmodelsforgrapevinewaterstatusestimation
AT michaelbretherton evaluationofpointhyperspectralreflectanceandmultivariateregressionmodelsforgrapevinewaterstatusestimation
AT matthewirwin evaluationofpointhyperspectralreflectanceandmultivariateregressionmodelsforgrapevinewaterstatusestimation
AT eduardosandoval evaluationofpointhyperspectralreflectanceandmultivariateregressionmodelsforgrapevinewaterstatusestimation
_version_ 1721190249525149696