Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease-A Meta-Analysis.

Despite vaccines and improved medical intensive care, clinicians must continue to be vigilant of possible Meningococcal Disease in children. The objective was to establish if the procalcitonin test was a cost-effective adjunct for prodromal Meningococcal Disease in children presenting at emergency d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer M Bell, Michael D Shields, Ashley Agus, Kathryn Dunlop, Thomas Bourke, Frank Kee, Fiona Lynn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4459795?pdf=render
id doaj-2eae9560774b40188a3111881e1e0d61
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2eae9560774b40188a3111881e1e0d612020-11-25T02:27:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e012899310.1371/journal.pone.0128993Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease-A Meta-Analysis.Jennifer M BellMichael D ShieldsAshley AgusKathryn DunlopThomas BourkeFrank KeeFiona LynnDespite vaccines and improved medical intensive care, clinicians must continue to be vigilant of possible Meningococcal Disease in children. The objective was to establish if the procalcitonin test was a cost-effective adjunct for prodromal Meningococcal Disease in children presenting at emergency department with fever without source.Data to evaluate procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white cell count tests as indicators of Meningococcal Disease were collected from six independent studies identified through a systematic literature search, applying PRISMA guidelines. The data included 881 children with fever without source in developed countries.The optimal cut-off value for the procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white cell count tests, each as an indicator of Meningococcal Disease, was determined. Summary Receiver Operator Curve analysis determined the overall diagnostic performance of each test with 95% confidence intervals. A decision analytic model was designed to reflect realistic clinical pathways for a child presenting with fever without source by comparing two diagnostic strategies: standard testing using combined C-reactive protein and white cell count tests compared to standard testing plus procalcitonin test. The costs of each of the four diagnosis groups (true positive, false negative, true negative and false positive) were assessed from a National Health Service payer perspective. The procalcitonin test was more accurate (sensitivity=0.89, 95%CI=0.76-0.96; specificity=0.74, 95%CI=0.4-0.92) for early Meningococcal Disease compared to standard testing alone (sensitivity=0.47, 95%CI=0.32-0.62; specificity=0.8, 95% CI=0.64-0.9). Decision analytic model outcomes indicated that the incremental cost effectiveness ratio for the base case was £-8,137.25 (US $ -13,371.94) per correctly treated patient.Procalcitonin plus standard recommended tests, improved the discriminatory ability for fatal Meningococcal Disease and was more cost-effective; it was also a superior biomarker in infants. Further research is recommended for point-of-care procalcitonin testing and Markov modelling to incorporate cost per QALY with a life-time model.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4459795?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jennifer M Bell
Michael D Shields
Ashley Agus
Kathryn Dunlop
Thomas Bourke
Frank Kee
Fiona Lynn
spellingShingle Jennifer M Bell
Michael D Shields
Ashley Agus
Kathryn Dunlop
Thomas Bourke
Frank Kee
Fiona Lynn
Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease-A Meta-Analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jennifer M Bell
Michael D Shields
Ashley Agus
Kathryn Dunlop
Thomas Bourke
Frank Kee
Fiona Lynn
author_sort Jennifer M Bell
title Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease-A Meta-Analysis.
title_short Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease-A Meta-Analysis.
title_full Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease-A Meta-Analysis.
title_fullStr Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease-A Meta-Analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease-A Meta-Analysis.
title_sort clinical and cost-effectiveness of procalcitonin test for prodromal meningococcal disease-a meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Despite vaccines and improved medical intensive care, clinicians must continue to be vigilant of possible Meningococcal Disease in children. The objective was to establish if the procalcitonin test was a cost-effective adjunct for prodromal Meningococcal Disease in children presenting at emergency department with fever without source.Data to evaluate procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white cell count tests as indicators of Meningococcal Disease were collected from six independent studies identified through a systematic literature search, applying PRISMA guidelines. The data included 881 children with fever without source in developed countries.The optimal cut-off value for the procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white cell count tests, each as an indicator of Meningococcal Disease, was determined. Summary Receiver Operator Curve analysis determined the overall diagnostic performance of each test with 95% confidence intervals. A decision analytic model was designed to reflect realistic clinical pathways for a child presenting with fever without source by comparing two diagnostic strategies: standard testing using combined C-reactive protein and white cell count tests compared to standard testing plus procalcitonin test. The costs of each of the four diagnosis groups (true positive, false negative, true negative and false positive) were assessed from a National Health Service payer perspective. The procalcitonin test was more accurate (sensitivity=0.89, 95%CI=0.76-0.96; specificity=0.74, 95%CI=0.4-0.92) for early Meningococcal Disease compared to standard testing alone (sensitivity=0.47, 95%CI=0.32-0.62; specificity=0.8, 95% CI=0.64-0.9). Decision analytic model outcomes indicated that the incremental cost effectiveness ratio for the base case was £-8,137.25 (US $ -13,371.94) per correctly treated patient.Procalcitonin plus standard recommended tests, improved the discriminatory ability for fatal Meningococcal Disease and was more cost-effective; it was also a superior biomarker in infants. Further research is recommended for point-of-care procalcitonin testing and Markov modelling to incorporate cost per QALY with a life-time model.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4459795?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jennifermbell clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
AT michaeldshields clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
AT ashleyagus clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
AT kathryndunlop clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
AT thomasbourke clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
AT frankkee clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
AT fionalynn clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
_version_ 1724842933914435584