Calibration of a Hub Dynamic Balancing Machine Based on the Least Squares Method and Systematic Error Analysis
To resolve issues such as excessive residual vibrations and unsatisfactory balance effects in the balancing process, the particle swarm optimization (PSO)algorithm is combined with the least squares influence coefficient method of rotor dynamic balance to perform dynamic balance calibration based on...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
2020-01-01
|
Series: | IEEE Access |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9200484/ |
id |
doaj-2ea3dddd339d448489f1d1f7944acd3d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2ea3dddd339d448489f1d1f7944acd3d2021-03-30T04:49:33ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362020-01-01817874617875410.1109/ACCESS.2020.30248509200484Calibration of a Hub Dynamic Balancing Machine Based on the Least Squares Method and Systematic Error AnalysisYuan Cao0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4746-0245Fang Li1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4746-0245Jianguo Cao2Tao Wang3School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, ChinaChina Academy of Machinery Science and Technology Group, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, ChinaTo resolve issues such as excessive residual vibrations and unsatisfactory balance effects in the balancing process, the particle swarm optimization (PSO)algorithm is combined with the least squares influence coefficient method of rotor dynamic balance to perform dynamic balance calibration based on the research of the least squares influence coefficient method of wheel dynamic balance. The influence coefficient generally has a large error due to the influence of the vibration measured value, thereby lowering the accuracy of the calibrated influence coefficient. Therefore, the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) method is employed to address the influence coefficient error, and the result is compared with the calibration value of the influence coefficient (IC) method. The analysis results indicate that the residual value generated by the calibration of the influence coefficient through the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) is 1.036 while the residual value obtained through the influence coefficient (IC) method is 1.513, suggesting that the former exhibits a smaller systematic error and is closer to the true value.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9200484/Rotor balancinginfluence coefficient methodleast squares methodparticle swarm optimization |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yuan Cao Fang Li Jianguo Cao Tao Wang |
spellingShingle |
Yuan Cao Fang Li Jianguo Cao Tao Wang Calibration of a Hub Dynamic Balancing Machine Based on the Least Squares Method and Systematic Error Analysis IEEE Access Rotor balancing influence coefficient method least squares method particle swarm optimization |
author_facet |
Yuan Cao Fang Li Jianguo Cao Tao Wang |
author_sort |
Yuan Cao |
title |
Calibration of a Hub Dynamic Balancing Machine Based on the Least Squares Method and Systematic Error Analysis |
title_short |
Calibration of a Hub Dynamic Balancing Machine Based on the Least Squares Method and Systematic Error Analysis |
title_full |
Calibration of a Hub Dynamic Balancing Machine Based on the Least Squares Method and Systematic Error Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Calibration of a Hub Dynamic Balancing Machine Based on the Least Squares Method and Systematic Error Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Calibration of a Hub Dynamic Balancing Machine Based on the Least Squares Method and Systematic Error Analysis |
title_sort |
calibration of a hub dynamic balancing machine based on the least squares method and systematic error analysis |
publisher |
IEEE |
series |
IEEE Access |
issn |
2169-3536 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
To resolve issues such as excessive residual vibrations and unsatisfactory balance effects in the balancing process, the particle swarm optimization (PSO)algorithm is combined with the least squares influence coefficient method of rotor dynamic balance to perform dynamic balance calibration based on the research of the least squares influence coefficient method of wheel dynamic balance. The influence coefficient generally has a large error due to the influence of the vibration measured value, thereby lowering the accuracy of the calibrated influence coefficient. Therefore, the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) method is employed to address the influence coefficient error, and the result is compared with the calibration value of the influence coefficient (IC) method. The analysis results indicate that the residual value generated by the calibration of the influence coefficient through the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) is 1.036 while the residual value obtained through the influence coefficient (IC) method is 1.513, suggesting that the former exhibits a smaller systematic error and is closer to the true value. |
topic |
Rotor balancing influence coefficient method least squares method particle swarm optimization |
url |
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9200484/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yuancao calibrationofahubdynamicbalancingmachinebasedontheleastsquaresmethodandsystematicerroranalysis AT fangli calibrationofahubdynamicbalancingmachinebasedontheleastsquaresmethodandsystematicerroranalysis AT jianguocao calibrationofahubdynamicbalancingmachinebasedontheleastsquaresmethodandsystematicerroranalysis AT taowang calibrationofahubdynamicbalancingmachinebasedontheleastsquaresmethodandsystematicerroranalysis |
_version_ |
1724181076887207936 |