Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning

Abstract Visual input to primary visual cortex (V1) depends on highly adaptive filtering in the retina. In turn, isolation of V1 computations requires experimental control of retinal adaptation to infer its spatio-temporal-chromatic output. Here, we measure the balance of input to mouse V1, in the a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. Rhim, G. Coello-Reyes, I. Nauhaus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90650-4
id doaj-2e97c5e2ec89431cb39731bd8e5800a8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e97c5e2ec89431cb39731bd8e5800a82021-06-13T11:38:11ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-06-0111112110.1038/s41598-021-90650-4Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuningI. Rhim0G. Coello-Reyes1I. Nauhaus2Department of Psychology, University of Texas At AustinDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas At AustinDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas At AustinAbstract Visual input to primary visual cortex (V1) depends on highly adaptive filtering in the retina. In turn, isolation of V1 computations requires experimental control of retinal adaptation to infer its spatio-temporal-chromatic output. Here, we measure the balance of input to mouse V1, in the anesthetized setup, from the three main photoreceptor opsins—M-opsin, S-opsin, and rhodopsin—as a function of two stimulus dimensions. The first dimension is the level of light adaptation within the mesopic range, which governs the balance of rod and cone inputs to cortex. The second stimulus dimension is retinotopic position, which governs the balance of S- and M-cone opsin input due to the opsin expression gradient in the retina. The fitted model predicts opsin input under arbitrary lighting environments, which provides a much-needed handle on in-vivo studies of the mouse visual system. We use it here to reveal that V1 is rod-mediated in common laboratory settings yet cone-mediated in natural daylight. Next, we compare functional properties of V1 under rod and cone-mediated inputs. The results show that cone-mediated V1 responds to 2.5-fold higher temporal frequencies than rod-mediated V1. Furthermore, cone-mediated V1 has smaller receptive fields, yet similar spatial frequency tuning. V1 responses in rod-deficient (Gnat1−/−) mice confirm that the effects are due to differences in photoreceptor opsin contribution.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90650-4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I. Rhim
G. Coello-Reyes
I. Nauhaus
spellingShingle I. Rhim
G. Coello-Reyes
I. Nauhaus
Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
Scientific Reports
author_facet I. Rhim
G. Coello-Reyes
I. Nauhaus
author_sort I. Rhim
title Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
title_short Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
title_full Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
title_fullStr Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
title_full_unstemmed Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
title_sort variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Visual input to primary visual cortex (V1) depends on highly adaptive filtering in the retina. In turn, isolation of V1 computations requires experimental control of retinal adaptation to infer its spatio-temporal-chromatic output. Here, we measure the balance of input to mouse V1, in the anesthetized setup, from the three main photoreceptor opsins—M-opsin, S-opsin, and rhodopsin—as a function of two stimulus dimensions. The first dimension is the level of light adaptation within the mesopic range, which governs the balance of rod and cone inputs to cortex. The second stimulus dimension is retinotopic position, which governs the balance of S- and M-cone opsin input due to the opsin expression gradient in the retina. The fitted model predicts opsin input under arbitrary lighting environments, which provides a much-needed handle on in-vivo studies of the mouse visual system. We use it here to reveal that V1 is rod-mediated in common laboratory settings yet cone-mediated in natural daylight. Next, we compare functional properties of V1 under rod and cone-mediated inputs. The results show that cone-mediated V1 responds to 2.5-fold higher temporal frequencies than rod-mediated V1. Furthermore, cone-mediated V1 has smaller receptive fields, yet similar spatial frequency tuning. V1 responses in rod-deficient (Gnat1−/−) mice confirm that the effects are due to differences in photoreceptor opsin contribution.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90650-4
work_keys_str_mv AT irhim variationsinphotoreceptorthroughputtomousevisualcortexandtheuniqueeffectsontuning
AT gcoelloreyes variationsinphotoreceptorthroughputtomousevisualcortexandtheuniqueeffectsontuning
AT inauhaus variationsinphotoreceptorthroughputtomousevisualcortexandtheuniqueeffectsontuning
_version_ 1721379548106326016