A randomized comparative study of tamsulosin vs placebo in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Objective: The rationale of using α1, blockers in the man-agement of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is based upon blocking the adrenergic receptors which regulate urinary outflow The prostate adenoma is predominantly stromal, having 40% of smooth muscle innervated by sym-pathetic adrenergic ner...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N K Mohanty, R P Arora, Rajiba L Nayak, Vineet Malhotra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2003-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2003;volume=20;issue=1;spage=40;epage=45;aulast=Mohanty
id doaj-2e77381b3f144855b02e0f4940e4f6b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e77381b3f144855b02e0f4940e4f6b02020-11-24T23:40:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Urology0970-15911998-38242003-01-012014045A randomized comparative study of tamsulosin vs placebo in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasiaN K MohantyR P AroraRajiba L NayakVineet MalhotraObjective: The rationale of using α1, blockers in the man-agement of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is based upon blocking the adrenergic receptors which regulate urinary outflow The prostate adenoma is predominantly stromal, having 40% of smooth muscle innervated by sym-pathetic adrenergic nerves stimulation of which accounts for 50% of outflow obstruction. Tamsulosin is an uroselective α1a/d blocker, controls both the lower urinary irritative and obstructive symptoms. The present study is a placebo controlled study evaluating the efficacy, safety and advantages of tamsulosin in the management of BPH. Methods: A total number of 72 patients between 40-80 years of age were randomized to two groups. One group (38 patients) received tamsulosin (0.4 mg) daily and the other group (34 patients) received placebo for a period of two months with periodic follow up at 2nd , 4 th and 8 th week with IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) and uroflowmetry and ultrasonography at 8 th week. Results: Our results show tamsulosin to be very effec-tive in the management of BPH cases, not requiring sur-gery, with few side effects and good patient compliance. The improvement was seen both in IPSS (total, obstruc-tive and irritative) and in urodynamic parameters. The differences were consistently superior with tamsulosin as compared to placebo in both the IPSS as well as uroflow-metry measurements. Conclusion: Tamsulosin was found to be a very safe, well tolerated drug showing significant improvement in urinary outflow symptoms, reducing post void urine volume and decreasing IPSS with minimal tolerable adverse events.http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2003;volume=20;issue=1;spage=40;epage=45;aulast=MohantyMedical managementtamsulosinbenign prostate.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N K Mohanty
R P Arora
Rajiba L Nayak
Vineet Malhotra
spellingShingle N K Mohanty
R P Arora
Rajiba L Nayak
Vineet Malhotra
A randomized comparative study of tamsulosin vs placebo in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Indian Journal of Urology
Medical management
tamsulosin
benign prostate.
author_facet N K Mohanty
R P Arora
Rajiba L Nayak
Vineet Malhotra
author_sort N K Mohanty
title A randomized comparative study of tamsulosin vs placebo in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_short A randomized comparative study of tamsulosin vs placebo in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_full A randomized comparative study of tamsulosin vs placebo in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_fullStr A randomized comparative study of tamsulosin vs placebo in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_full_unstemmed A randomized comparative study of tamsulosin vs placebo in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
title_sort randomized comparative study of tamsulosin vs placebo in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Urology
issn 0970-1591
1998-3824
publishDate 2003-01-01
description Objective: The rationale of using α1, blockers in the man-agement of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is based upon blocking the adrenergic receptors which regulate urinary outflow The prostate adenoma is predominantly stromal, having 40% of smooth muscle innervated by sym-pathetic adrenergic nerves stimulation of which accounts for 50% of outflow obstruction. Tamsulosin is an uroselective α1a/d blocker, controls both the lower urinary irritative and obstructive symptoms. The present study is a placebo controlled study evaluating the efficacy, safety and advantages of tamsulosin in the management of BPH. Methods: A total number of 72 patients between 40-80 years of age were randomized to two groups. One group (38 patients) received tamsulosin (0.4 mg) daily and the other group (34 patients) received placebo for a period of two months with periodic follow up at 2nd , 4 th and 8 th week with IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) and uroflowmetry and ultrasonography at 8 th week. Results: Our results show tamsulosin to be very effec-tive in the management of BPH cases, not requiring sur-gery, with few side effects and good patient compliance. The improvement was seen both in IPSS (total, obstruc-tive and irritative) and in urodynamic parameters. The differences were consistently superior with tamsulosin as compared to placebo in both the IPSS as well as uroflow-metry measurements. Conclusion: Tamsulosin was found to be a very safe, well tolerated drug showing significant improvement in urinary outflow symptoms, reducing post void urine volume and decreasing IPSS with minimal tolerable adverse events.
topic Medical management
tamsulosin
benign prostate.
url http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2003;volume=20;issue=1;spage=40;epage=45;aulast=Mohanty
work_keys_str_mv AT nkmohanty arandomizedcomparativestudyoftamsulosinvsplacebointhetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT rparora arandomizedcomparativestudyoftamsulosinvsplacebointhetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT rajibalnayak arandomizedcomparativestudyoftamsulosinvsplacebointhetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT vineetmalhotra arandomizedcomparativestudyoftamsulosinvsplacebointhetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT nkmohanty randomizedcomparativestudyoftamsulosinvsplacebointhetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT rparora randomizedcomparativestudyoftamsulosinvsplacebointhetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT rajibalnayak randomizedcomparativestudyoftamsulosinvsplacebointhetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT vineetmalhotra randomizedcomparativestudyoftamsulosinvsplacebointhetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasia
_version_ 1725509584025550848