Clinical outcomes of the “resect and discard” strategy using magnifying narrow-band imaging for small (< 10 mm) colorectal polyps

Background and study aim The “resect and discard” strategy is a new paradigm for the management of small colorectal polyps that reduces the cost and effort related to pathological diagnosis after polypectomy. This retrospective study aimed to clarify the clinical outcome of the “resect and discard”...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shigetsugu Tsuji, Yasuhito Takeda, Kunihiro Tsuji, Naohiro Yoshida, Kenichi Takemura, Shinya Yamada, Hisashi Doyama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-11-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0650-4362
id doaj-2e4571bd1053423f91208ab494eee00c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e4571bd1053423f91208ab494eee00c2020-11-25T03:52:44ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362018-11-010612E1382E138910.1055/a-0650-4362Clinical outcomes of the “resect and discard” strategy using magnifying narrow-band imaging for small (< 10 mm) colorectal polypsShigetsugu Tsuji0Yasuhito Takeda1Kunihiro Tsuji2Naohiro Yoshida3Kenichi Takemura4Shinya Yamada5Hisashi Doyama6Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanBackground and study aim The “resect and discard” strategy is a new paradigm for the management of small colorectal polyps that reduces the cost and effort related to pathological diagnosis after polypectomy. This retrospective study aimed to clarify the clinical outcome of the “resect and discard” strategy for small colorectal polyps. Patients and methods The clinical records were reviewed from 501 consecutive patients who underwent the “resect and discard” strategy for colorectal polyps smaller than 10 mm at our hospital between January 2008 and December 2010. All colorectal lesions were evaluated onsite under magnifying narrow-band imaging after careful conventional white-light imaging. In cases of low grade adenoma predicted with high confidence, colonoscopists selected the “resect and discard” option without formal histopathology. The mid-term outcomes were evaluated to validate the curability of the “resect and discard” strategy. Results The present study included 501 consecutive patients with 816 lesions. The mid-term outcomes were examined for 476 (95 %) patients who received follow-up for at least 1 year after undergoing the “resect and discard” strategy. The median observation period was 83 months (range 12 – 117 months). No patient died from colorectal cancer related to the procedure, resulting in a disease-specific survival rate of 100 %. There were no local and/or distant recurrences detected during follow-up. Conclusions The “resect and discard” strategy for small colorectal polyps under strict preoperative diagnosis achieves excellent mid-term outcome.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0650-4362
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shigetsugu Tsuji
Yasuhito Takeda
Kunihiro Tsuji
Naohiro Yoshida
Kenichi Takemura
Shinya Yamada
Hisashi Doyama
spellingShingle Shigetsugu Tsuji
Yasuhito Takeda
Kunihiro Tsuji
Naohiro Yoshida
Kenichi Takemura
Shinya Yamada
Hisashi Doyama
Clinical outcomes of the “resect and discard” strategy using magnifying narrow-band imaging for small (< 10 mm) colorectal polyps
Endoscopy International Open
author_facet Shigetsugu Tsuji
Yasuhito Takeda
Kunihiro Tsuji
Naohiro Yoshida
Kenichi Takemura
Shinya Yamada
Hisashi Doyama
author_sort Shigetsugu Tsuji
title Clinical outcomes of the “resect and discard” strategy using magnifying narrow-band imaging for small (< 10 mm) colorectal polyps
title_short Clinical outcomes of the “resect and discard” strategy using magnifying narrow-band imaging for small (< 10 mm) colorectal polyps
title_full Clinical outcomes of the “resect and discard” strategy using magnifying narrow-band imaging for small (< 10 mm) colorectal polyps
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of the “resect and discard” strategy using magnifying narrow-band imaging for small (< 10 mm) colorectal polyps
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of the “resect and discard” strategy using magnifying narrow-band imaging for small (< 10 mm) colorectal polyps
title_sort clinical outcomes of the “resect and discard” strategy using magnifying narrow-band imaging for small (< 10 mm) colorectal polyps
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
series Endoscopy International Open
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Background and study aim The “resect and discard” strategy is a new paradigm for the management of small colorectal polyps that reduces the cost and effort related to pathological diagnosis after polypectomy. This retrospective study aimed to clarify the clinical outcome of the “resect and discard” strategy for small colorectal polyps. Patients and methods The clinical records were reviewed from 501 consecutive patients who underwent the “resect and discard” strategy for colorectal polyps smaller than 10 mm at our hospital between January 2008 and December 2010. All colorectal lesions were evaluated onsite under magnifying narrow-band imaging after careful conventional white-light imaging. In cases of low grade adenoma predicted with high confidence, colonoscopists selected the “resect and discard” option without formal histopathology. The mid-term outcomes were evaluated to validate the curability of the “resect and discard” strategy. Results The present study included 501 consecutive patients with 816 lesions. The mid-term outcomes were examined for 476 (95 %) patients who received follow-up for at least 1 year after undergoing the “resect and discard” strategy. The median observation period was 83 months (range 12 – 117 months). No patient died from colorectal cancer related to the procedure, resulting in a disease-specific survival rate of 100 %. There were no local and/or distant recurrences detected during follow-up. Conclusions The “resect and discard” strategy for small colorectal polyps under strict preoperative diagnosis achieves excellent mid-term outcome.
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0650-4362
work_keys_str_mv AT shigetsugutsuji clinicaloutcomesoftheresectanddiscardstrategyusingmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingforsmall10mmcolorectalpolyps
AT yasuhitotakeda clinicaloutcomesoftheresectanddiscardstrategyusingmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingforsmall10mmcolorectalpolyps
AT kunihirotsuji clinicaloutcomesoftheresectanddiscardstrategyusingmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingforsmall10mmcolorectalpolyps
AT naohiroyoshida clinicaloutcomesoftheresectanddiscardstrategyusingmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingforsmall10mmcolorectalpolyps
AT kenichitakemura clinicaloutcomesoftheresectanddiscardstrategyusingmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingforsmall10mmcolorectalpolyps
AT shinyayamada clinicaloutcomesoftheresectanddiscardstrategyusingmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingforsmall10mmcolorectalpolyps
AT hisashidoyama clinicaloutcomesoftheresectanddiscardstrategyusingmagnifyingnarrowbandimagingforsmall10mmcolorectalpolyps
_version_ 1724481178179731456