Comparison of methods for modelling geomagnetically induced currents

Assessing the geomagnetic hazard to power systems requires reliable modelling of the geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) produced in the power network. This paper compares the Nodal Admittance Matrix method with the Lehtinen–Pirjola method and shows them to be mathematically equivalent. GIC c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. H. Boteler, R. J. Pirjola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-09-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/32/1177/2014/angeo-32-1177-2014.pdf
id doaj-2e41eba3240045c6bcb10bc9e5c7d67c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e41eba3240045c6bcb10bc9e5c7d67c2020-11-25T01:07:46ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762014-09-01321177118710.5194/angeo-32-1177-2014Comparison of methods for modelling geomagnetically induced currentsD. H. Boteler0R. J. Pirjola1R. J. Pirjola2Geomagnetic Laboratory, Earth Science Sector, Natural Resources Canada, 2617 Anderson Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0E7, CanadaGeomagnetic Laboratory, Earth Science Sector, Natural Resources Canada, 2617 Anderson Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0E7, CanadaFinnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, Helsinki, FinlandAssessing the geomagnetic hazard to power systems requires reliable modelling of the geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) produced in the power network. This paper compares the Nodal Admittance Matrix method with the Lehtinen–Pirjola method and shows them to be mathematically equivalent. GIC calculation using the Nodal Admittance Matrix method involves three steps: (1) using the voltage sources in the lines representing the induced geoelectric field to calculate equivalent current sources and summing these to obtain the nodal current sources, (2) performing the inversion of the admittance matrix and multiplying by the nodal current sources to obtain the nodal voltages, (3) using the nodal voltages to determine the currents in the lines and in the ground connections. In the Lehtinen–Pirjola method, steps 2 and 3 of the Nodal Admittance Matrix calculation are combined into one matrix expression. This involves inversion of a more complicated matrix but yields the currents to ground directly from the nodal current sources. To calculate GIC in multiple voltage levels of a power system, it is necessary to model the connections between voltage levels, not just the transmission lines and ground connections considered in traditional GIC modelling. Where GIC flow to ground through both the high-voltage and low-voltage windings of a transformer, they share a common path through the substation grounding resistance. This has been modelled previously by including non-zero, off-diagonal elements in the earthing impedance matrix of the Lehtinen–Pirjola method. However, this situation is more easily handled in both the Nodal Admittance Matrix method and the Lehtinen–Pirjola method by introducing a node at the neutral point.https://www.ann-geophys.net/32/1177/2014/angeo-32-1177-2014.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. H. Boteler
R. J. Pirjola
R. J. Pirjola
spellingShingle D. H. Boteler
R. J. Pirjola
R. J. Pirjola
Comparison of methods for modelling geomagnetically induced currents
Annales Geophysicae
author_facet D. H. Boteler
R. J. Pirjola
R. J. Pirjola
author_sort D. H. Boteler
title Comparison of methods for modelling geomagnetically induced currents
title_short Comparison of methods for modelling geomagnetically induced currents
title_full Comparison of methods for modelling geomagnetically induced currents
title_fullStr Comparison of methods for modelling geomagnetically induced currents
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods for modelling geomagnetically induced currents
title_sort comparison of methods for modelling geomagnetically induced currents
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Annales Geophysicae
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
publishDate 2014-09-01
description Assessing the geomagnetic hazard to power systems requires reliable modelling of the geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) produced in the power network. This paper compares the Nodal Admittance Matrix method with the Lehtinen–Pirjola method and shows them to be mathematically equivalent. GIC calculation using the Nodal Admittance Matrix method involves three steps: (1) using the voltage sources in the lines representing the induced geoelectric field to calculate equivalent current sources and summing these to obtain the nodal current sources, (2) performing the inversion of the admittance matrix and multiplying by the nodal current sources to obtain the nodal voltages, (3) using the nodal voltages to determine the currents in the lines and in the ground connections. In the Lehtinen–Pirjola method, steps 2 and 3 of the Nodal Admittance Matrix calculation are combined into one matrix expression. This involves inversion of a more complicated matrix but yields the currents to ground directly from the nodal current sources. To calculate GIC in multiple voltage levels of a power system, it is necessary to model the connections between voltage levels, not just the transmission lines and ground connections considered in traditional GIC modelling. Where GIC flow to ground through both the high-voltage and low-voltage windings of a transformer, they share a common path through the substation grounding resistance. This has been modelled previously by including non-zero, off-diagonal elements in the earthing impedance matrix of the Lehtinen–Pirjola method. However, this situation is more easily handled in both the Nodal Admittance Matrix method and the Lehtinen–Pirjola method by introducing a node at the neutral point.
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/32/1177/2014/angeo-32-1177-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dhboteler comparisonofmethodsformodellinggeomagneticallyinducedcurrents
AT rjpirjola comparisonofmethodsformodellinggeomagneticallyinducedcurrents
AT rjpirjola comparisonofmethodsformodellinggeomagneticallyinducedcurrents
_version_ 1725185362966347776