Transdisciplinarity in the university: discourse and practice - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v3i3.270en

This article presents discussions and partial results of a piece of doctoral research centered on the questions raised by the new forms of production and organization of knowledge, guided by the discourse and practice of transdisciplinarity. The latter is understood in the context of the university,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aleixina Maria Lopes Andalécio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz) 2009-09-01
Series:RECIIS
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.reciis.cict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/270/336
id doaj-2e38122f62d24dae968a9518107caa3e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e38122f62d24dae968a9518107caa3e2021-05-02T03:38:53ZengInstituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)RECIIS1981-62782009-09-01338389Transdisciplinarity in the university: discourse and practice - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v3i3.270enAleixina Maria Lopes AndalécioThis article presents discussions and partial results of a piece of doctoral research centered on the questions raised by the new forms of production and organization of knowledge, guided by the discourse and practice of transdisciplinarity. The latter is understood in the context of the university, as an effort to overcome the fragmentation of knowledge into disciplines and excessive specialization, in face of the complex reality of the modern world, with its relational and interconnected character. To guide the questions, the research is based on the presuppositions that there is an epistemological, practical, social, and political distance between the discourse and the practice of transdisciplinarity. The empirical terrain is represented by the analysis of two large institutional transdisciplinary projects implemented at the Federal University of Minas Gerais in the late 1990s. In the methodology, thematic document analysis techniques, in-depth interviews, and direct observation are used. The results reached so far indicate that even researchers who have a strong discourse in favor of transdisciplinarity still work in a disciplinary manner in practice. However, even among researchers who are called “disciplinary”, there seems to be a consensus that current problems demand a different approach and transdisciplinarity presents itself as an appropriate alternative to deal with them.http://www.reciis.cict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/270/336knowledgeuniversitytransdisciplinarityinformation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aleixina Maria Lopes Andalécio
spellingShingle Aleixina Maria Lopes Andalécio
Transdisciplinarity in the university: discourse and practice - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v3i3.270en
RECIIS
knowledge
university
transdisciplinarity
information
author_facet Aleixina Maria Lopes Andalécio
author_sort Aleixina Maria Lopes Andalécio
title Transdisciplinarity in the university: discourse and practice - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v3i3.270en
title_short Transdisciplinarity in the university: discourse and practice - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v3i3.270en
title_full Transdisciplinarity in the university: discourse and practice - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v3i3.270en
title_fullStr Transdisciplinarity in the university: discourse and practice - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v3i3.270en
title_full_unstemmed Transdisciplinarity in the university: discourse and practice - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v3i3.270en
title_sort transdisciplinarity in the university: discourse and practice - doi: 10.3395/reciis.v3i3.270en
publisher Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)
series RECIIS
issn 1981-6278
publishDate 2009-09-01
description This article presents discussions and partial results of a piece of doctoral research centered on the questions raised by the new forms of production and organization of knowledge, guided by the discourse and practice of transdisciplinarity. The latter is understood in the context of the university, as an effort to overcome the fragmentation of knowledge into disciplines and excessive specialization, in face of the complex reality of the modern world, with its relational and interconnected character. To guide the questions, the research is based on the presuppositions that there is an epistemological, practical, social, and political distance between the discourse and the practice of transdisciplinarity. The empirical terrain is represented by the analysis of two large institutional transdisciplinary projects implemented at the Federal University of Minas Gerais in the late 1990s. In the methodology, thematic document analysis techniques, in-depth interviews, and direct observation are used. The results reached so far indicate that even researchers who have a strong discourse in favor of transdisciplinarity still work in a disciplinary manner in practice. However, even among researchers who are called “disciplinary”, there seems to be a consensus that current problems demand a different approach and transdisciplinarity presents itself as an appropriate alternative to deal with them.
topic knowledge
university
transdisciplinarity
information
url http://www.reciis.cict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/270/336
work_keys_str_mv AT aleixinamarialopesandalecio transdisciplinarityintheuniversitydiscourseandpracticedoi103395reciisv3i3270en
_version_ 1721495490929885184