Machine learning-based approach to analyze saccadic eye movement in patients with mild traumatic brain injury

Many concussions, the mildest form of TBI, go unreported; so the true incidence of TBI makes it the commonest or second most common neurological condition, next to migraines. A concussion can interfere with the transfer of information across the connecting axons in the brain that can be disrupted by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kayvan Tirdad, Alex Dela Cruz, Cory Austin, Alireza Sadeghian, Shadi Mousavi Nia, Michael Cusimano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990021000252
Description
Summary:Many concussions, the mildest form of TBI, go unreported; so the true incidence of TBI makes it the commonest or second most common neurological condition, next to migraines. A concussion can interfere with the transfer of information across the connecting axons in the brain that can be disrupted by TBI, thus resulting in a wide range of symptoms and signs of injury. Although it is known that rapid eye movements, called saccades, can be affected by TBI, the ability to distinguish different phases during the recovery or non-recovery from mild TBI like concussion is not well studied. This research aimed to develop a Machine Learning(ML)-based model that could classify stages after concussions through saccadic eye movement. A dataset of 34 mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), 27 persisting symptoms called post-trauma syndrome (PTS), and 31 healthy (Control) participants with no prior history of acquired head trauma was collected. Each participant underwent Step, Anti-saccade, and Go/No-Go saccade test. Statistical analysis of each trial’s features generated 3450 additional engineered features. An ensemble model, which consisted of various random forest classifiers, was implemented and trained on selected features to classify TBI based on the 116 selected features. The final model classified mTBI vs. PTS vs. Control with an accuracy of 87.8% and TBI (mTBI and PTS) vs. Control with an accuracy of 91.1%. The application of ML allowed the analysis of complex nonlinear patterns in saccadic eye movement to be distinguished and patients’ classified as mTBI, PTS, or Control.
ISSN:2666-9900