Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments
This study examined stopping and performance adjustments in four age groups (M ages: 8, 12, 21, and 76 years). All participants performed on three tasks, a standard two-choice task and the same task in which stop-signal trials were inserted requiring either the suppression of the response activated...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2011-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00357/full |
id |
doaj-2e118851bef143118a82cdeeec7a7f62 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2e118851bef143118a82cdeeec7a7f622020-11-24T22:45:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782011-12-01210.3389/fpsyg.2011.0035715563Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustmentsMaria Christina Van De Laar0Wery P.M. Van Den Wildenberg1Geert evan Boxtel2Maurits evan der Molen3University of AmsterdamUniversity of AmsterdamUniversity of TilburgDepartment of PsychologyThis study examined stopping and performance adjustments in four age groups (M ages: 8, 12, 21, and 76 years). All participants performed on three tasks, a standard two-choice task and the same task in which stop-signal trials were inserted requiring either the suppression of the response activated by the choice stimulus (global stop task) or the suppression of the response when one stop signal was presented but not when the other stop signal occurred (selective stop task). The results showed that global stopping was faster than selective stopping in all age groups. Global stopping matured more rapidly than selective stopping. The developmental gain in stopping was considerably more pronounced compared to the loss observed during senescence. All age groups slowed the response on trials without a stop signal in the stop task compared to trials in the choice task, the elderly in particular. In addition, all age groups slowed on trials following stop-signal trials, except the elderly who did not slow following successful inhibits. By contrast, the slowing following failed inhibits was disproportionally larger in the elderly compared to young adults. Finally, sequential effects did not alter the pattern of performance adjustments. The results were interpreted in terms of developmental change in the balance between proactive and reactive control.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00357/fullcognitive controldevelopmentcognitive agingLifespanStop-signal paradigm |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maria Christina Van De Laar Wery P.M. Van Den Wildenberg Geert evan Boxtel Maurits evan der Molen |
spellingShingle |
Maria Christina Van De Laar Wery P.M. Van Den Wildenberg Geert evan Boxtel Maurits evan der Molen Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments Frontiers in Psychology cognitive control development cognitive aging Lifespan Stop-signal paradigm |
author_facet |
Maria Christina Van De Laar Wery P.M. Van Den Wildenberg Geert evan Boxtel Maurits evan der Molen |
author_sort |
Maria Christina Van De Laar |
title |
Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments |
title_short |
Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments |
title_full |
Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments |
title_fullStr |
Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments |
title_sort |
lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2011-12-01 |
description |
This study examined stopping and performance adjustments in four age groups (M ages: 8, 12, 21, and 76 years). All participants performed on three tasks, a standard two-choice task and the same task in which stop-signal trials were inserted requiring either the suppression of the response activated by the choice stimulus (global stop task) or the suppression of the response when one stop signal was presented but not when the other stop signal occurred (selective stop task). The results showed that global stopping was faster than selective stopping in all age groups. Global stopping matured more rapidly than selective stopping. The developmental gain in stopping was considerably more pronounced compared to the loss observed during senescence. All age groups slowed the response on trials without a stop signal in the stop task compared to trials in the choice task, the elderly in particular. In addition, all age groups slowed on trials following stop-signal trials, except the elderly who did not slow following successful inhibits. By contrast, the slowing following failed inhibits was disproportionally larger in the elderly compared to young adults. Finally, sequential effects did not alter the pattern of performance adjustments. The results were interpreted in terms of developmental change in the balance between proactive and reactive control. |
topic |
cognitive control development cognitive aging Lifespan Stop-signal paradigm |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00357/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariachristinavandelaar lifespanchangesinglobalandselectivestoppingandperformanceadjustments AT werypmvandenwildenberg lifespanchangesinglobalandselectivestoppingandperformanceadjustments AT geertevanboxtel lifespanchangesinglobalandselectivestoppingandperformanceadjustments AT mauritsevandermolen lifespanchangesinglobalandselectivestoppingandperformanceadjustments |
_version_ |
1725687962259161088 |