Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments

This study examined stopping and performance adjustments in four age groups (M ages: 8, 12, 21, and 76 years). All participants performed on three tasks, a standard two-choice task and the same task in which stop-signal trials were inserted requiring either the suppression of the response activated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Christina Van De Laar, Wery P.M. Van Den Wildenberg, Geert evan Boxtel, Maurits evan der Molen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2011-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00357/full
id doaj-2e118851bef143118a82cdeeec7a7f62
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e118851bef143118a82cdeeec7a7f622020-11-24T22:45:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782011-12-01210.3389/fpsyg.2011.0035715563Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustmentsMaria Christina Van De Laar0Wery P.M. Van Den Wildenberg1Geert evan Boxtel2Maurits evan der Molen3University of AmsterdamUniversity of AmsterdamUniversity of TilburgDepartment of PsychologyThis study examined stopping and performance adjustments in four age groups (M ages: 8, 12, 21, and 76 years). All participants performed on three tasks, a standard two-choice task and the same task in which stop-signal trials were inserted requiring either the suppression of the response activated by the choice stimulus (global stop task) or the suppression of the response when one stop signal was presented but not when the other stop signal occurred (selective stop task). The results showed that global stopping was faster than selective stopping in all age groups. Global stopping matured more rapidly than selective stopping. The developmental gain in stopping was considerably more pronounced compared to the loss observed during senescence. All age groups slowed the response on trials without a stop signal in the stop task compared to trials in the choice task, the elderly in particular. In addition, all age groups slowed on trials following stop-signal trials, except the elderly who did not slow following successful inhibits. By contrast, the slowing following failed inhibits was disproportionally larger in the elderly compared to young adults. Finally, sequential effects did not alter the pattern of performance adjustments. The results were interpreted in terms of developmental change in the balance between proactive and reactive control.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00357/fullcognitive controldevelopmentcognitive agingLifespanStop-signal paradigm
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Christina Van De Laar
Wery P.M. Van Den Wildenberg
Geert evan Boxtel
Maurits evan der Molen
spellingShingle Maria Christina Van De Laar
Wery P.M. Van Den Wildenberg
Geert evan Boxtel
Maurits evan der Molen
Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments
Frontiers in Psychology
cognitive control
development
cognitive aging
Lifespan
Stop-signal paradigm
author_facet Maria Christina Van De Laar
Wery P.M. Van Den Wildenberg
Geert evan Boxtel
Maurits evan der Molen
author_sort Maria Christina Van De Laar
title Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments
title_short Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments
title_full Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments
title_fullStr Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments
title_full_unstemmed Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments
title_sort lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2011-12-01
description This study examined stopping and performance adjustments in four age groups (M ages: 8, 12, 21, and 76 years). All participants performed on three tasks, a standard two-choice task and the same task in which stop-signal trials were inserted requiring either the suppression of the response activated by the choice stimulus (global stop task) or the suppression of the response when one stop signal was presented but not when the other stop signal occurred (selective stop task). The results showed that global stopping was faster than selective stopping in all age groups. Global stopping matured more rapidly than selective stopping. The developmental gain in stopping was considerably more pronounced compared to the loss observed during senescence. All age groups slowed the response on trials without a stop signal in the stop task compared to trials in the choice task, the elderly in particular. In addition, all age groups slowed on trials following stop-signal trials, except the elderly who did not slow following successful inhibits. By contrast, the slowing following failed inhibits was disproportionally larger in the elderly compared to young adults. Finally, sequential effects did not alter the pattern of performance adjustments. The results were interpreted in terms of developmental change in the balance between proactive and reactive control.
topic cognitive control
development
cognitive aging
Lifespan
Stop-signal paradigm
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00357/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mariachristinavandelaar lifespanchangesinglobalandselectivestoppingandperformanceadjustments
AT werypmvandenwildenberg lifespanchangesinglobalandselectivestoppingandperformanceadjustments
AT geertevanboxtel lifespanchangesinglobalandselectivestoppingandperformanceadjustments
AT mauritsevandermolen lifespanchangesinglobalandselectivestoppingandperformanceadjustments
_version_ 1725687962259161088