The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map

Response instructions—inviting participants to respond from a certain perspective—can significantly influence the performance and construct validity of psychological measures. Stereotype Content Model (SCM) and then the BIAS map (“behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes”) were originally de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrej Findor, Barbara Lášticová, Matej Hruška, Miroslav Popper, Luca Váradi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566725/full
id doaj-2e11336ec24e4cf6ad03b3aca4c9ec17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e11336ec24e4cf6ad03b3aca4c9ec172020-11-25T03:54:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-10-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.566725566725The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS MapAndrej Findor0Barbara Lášticová1Matej Hruška2Miroslav Popper3Luca Váradi4Luca Váradi5Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, SlovakiaInstitute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, SlovakiaFaculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, SlovakiaFaculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, SlovakiaNationalism Studies Program, Central European University, Budapest, HungaryFaculty of Social Science, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, HungaryResponse instructions—inviting participants to respond from a certain perspective—can significantly influence the performance and construct validity of psychological measures. Stereotype Content Model (SCM) and then the BIAS map (“behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes”) were originally developed as universal measures of shared cultural stereotypes—participants’ perceptions of what most of the people in a society think about the target group—and their related social-structural antecedents, emotions and behavioral tendencies. Yet a number of studies have adopted a different response instruction focusing on individual stereotypes—what the participants personally think about the target group. So far, there is little evidence to suggest how these two different response instructions (individual vs. shared cultural perspective) might influence the performance of the BIAS map, especially when applied to target groups that elicit different normative and social desirability concerns. To provide novel evidence, we conducted an experiment with a representative sample of ethnic Slovaks (N = 1269). In a 2 × 2 factorial design, we found response instruction (individual vs. shared cultural perspective) and target group [stigmatized ethnic minority (the Roma) vs. non-stigmatized ethnic minority (the Hungarians)] had significant effects on the BIAS map and their interaction had significant effects on the social structure and behavioral tendencies (but not on stereotypes and emotions) scales. Exploratory analysis also points to partial influence on the mediation hypothesis underlying the BIAS map and minor effects on its scale properties. Our evidence suggests that the difference between individual stereotypes and shared cultural stereotypes partially depends on the target group in question and that they should be treated as two potentially separate constructs.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566725/fullBIAS mapStereotype Content Modelresponse instructiontarget groupthe Romathe Hungarians
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrej Findor
Barbara Lášticová
Matej Hruška
Miroslav Popper
Luca Váradi
Luca Váradi
spellingShingle Andrej Findor
Barbara Lášticová
Matej Hruška
Miroslav Popper
Luca Váradi
Luca Váradi
The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map
Frontiers in Psychology
BIAS map
Stereotype Content Model
response instruction
target group
the Roma
the Hungarians
author_facet Andrej Findor
Barbara Lášticová
Matej Hruška
Miroslav Popper
Luca Váradi
Luca Váradi
author_sort Andrej Findor
title The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map
title_short The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map
title_full The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map
title_fullStr The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map
title_sort impact of response instruction and target group on the bias map
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Response instructions—inviting participants to respond from a certain perspective—can significantly influence the performance and construct validity of psychological measures. Stereotype Content Model (SCM) and then the BIAS map (“behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes”) were originally developed as universal measures of shared cultural stereotypes—participants’ perceptions of what most of the people in a society think about the target group—and their related social-structural antecedents, emotions and behavioral tendencies. Yet a number of studies have adopted a different response instruction focusing on individual stereotypes—what the participants personally think about the target group. So far, there is little evidence to suggest how these two different response instructions (individual vs. shared cultural perspective) might influence the performance of the BIAS map, especially when applied to target groups that elicit different normative and social desirability concerns. To provide novel evidence, we conducted an experiment with a representative sample of ethnic Slovaks (N = 1269). In a 2 × 2 factorial design, we found response instruction (individual vs. shared cultural perspective) and target group [stigmatized ethnic minority (the Roma) vs. non-stigmatized ethnic minority (the Hungarians)] had significant effects on the BIAS map and their interaction had significant effects on the social structure and behavioral tendencies (but not on stereotypes and emotions) scales. Exploratory analysis also points to partial influence on the mediation hypothesis underlying the BIAS map and minor effects on its scale properties. Our evidence suggests that the difference between individual stereotypes and shared cultural stereotypes partially depends on the target group in question and that they should be treated as two potentially separate constructs.
topic BIAS map
Stereotype Content Model
response instruction
target group
the Roma
the Hungarians
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566725/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andrejfindor theimpactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap
AT barbaralasticova theimpactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap
AT matejhruska theimpactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap
AT miroslavpopper theimpactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap
AT lucavaradi theimpactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap
AT lucavaradi theimpactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap
AT andrejfindor impactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap
AT barbaralasticova impactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap
AT matejhruska impactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap
AT miroslavpopper impactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap
AT lucavaradi impactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap
AT lucavaradi impactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap
_version_ 1724472453388828672