The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map
Response instructions—inviting participants to respond from a certain perspective—can significantly influence the performance and construct validity of psychological measures. Stereotype Content Model (SCM) and then the BIAS map (“behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes”) were originally de...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566725/full |
id |
doaj-2e11336ec24e4cf6ad03b3aca4c9ec17 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2e11336ec24e4cf6ad03b3aca4c9ec172020-11-25T03:54:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-10-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.566725566725The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS MapAndrej Findor0Barbara Lášticová1Matej Hruška2Miroslav Popper3Luca Váradi4Luca Váradi5Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, SlovakiaInstitute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, SlovakiaFaculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, SlovakiaFaculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, SlovakiaNationalism Studies Program, Central European University, Budapest, HungaryFaculty of Social Science, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, HungaryResponse instructions—inviting participants to respond from a certain perspective—can significantly influence the performance and construct validity of psychological measures. Stereotype Content Model (SCM) and then the BIAS map (“behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes”) were originally developed as universal measures of shared cultural stereotypes—participants’ perceptions of what most of the people in a society think about the target group—and their related social-structural antecedents, emotions and behavioral tendencies. Yet a number of studies have adopted a different response instruction focusing on individual stereotypes—what the participants personally think about the target group. So far, there is little evidence to suggest how these two different response instructions (individual vs. shared cultural perspective) might influence the performance of the BIAS map, especially when applied to target groups that elicit different normative and social desirability concerns. To provide novel evidence, we conducted an experiment with a representative sample of ethnic Slovaks (N = 1269). In a 2 × 2 factorial design, we found response instruction (individual vs. shared cultural perspective) and target group [stigmatized ethnic minority (the Roma) vs. non-stigmatized ethnic minority (the Hungarians)] had significant effects on the BIAS map and their interaction had significant effects on the social structure and behavioral tendencies (but not on stereotypes and emotions) scales. Exploratory analysis also points to partial influence on the mediation hypothesis underlying the BIAS map and minor effects on its scale properties. Our evidence suggests that the difference between individual stereotypes and shared cultural stereotypes partially depends on the target group in question and that they should be treated as two potentially separate constructs.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566725/fullBIAS mapStereotype Content Modelresponse instructiontarget groupthe Romathe Hungarians |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrej Findor Barbara Lášticová Matej Hruška Miroslav Popper Luca Váradi Luca Váradi |
spellingShingle |
Andrej Findor Barbara Lášticová Matej Hruška Miroslav Popper Luca Váradi Luca Váradi The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map Frontiers in Psychology BIAS map Stereotype Content Model response instruction target group the Roma the Hungarians |
author_facet |
Andrej Findor Barbara Lášticová Matej Hruška Miroslav Popper Luca Váradi Luca Váradi |
author_sort |
Andrej Findor |
title |
The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map |
title_short |
The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map |
title_full |
The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map |
title_fullStr |
The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Impact of Response Instruction and Target Group on the BIAS Map |
title_sort |
impact of response instruction and target group on the bias map |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
Response instructions—inviting participants to respond from a certain perspective—can significantly influence the performance and construct validity of psychological measures. Stereotype Content Model (SCM) and then the BIAS map (“behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes”) were originally developed as universal measures of shared cultural stereotypes—participants’ perceptions of what most of the people in a society think about the target group—and their related social-structural antecedents, emotions and behavioral tendencies. Yet a number of studies have adopted a different response instruction focusing on individual stereotypes—what the participants personally think about the target group. So far, there is little evidence to suggest how these two different response instructions (individual vs. shared cultural perspective) might influence the performance of the BIAS map, especially when applied to target groups that elicit different normative and social desirability concerns. To provide novel evidence, we conducted an experiment with a representative sample of ethnic Slovaks (N = 1269). In a 2 × 2 factorial design, we found response instruction (individual vs. shared cultural perspective) and target group [stigmatized ethnic minority (the Roma) vs. non-stigmatized ethnic minority (the Hungarians)] had significant effects on the BIAS map and their interaction had significant effects on the social structure and behavioral tendencies (but not on stereotypes and emotions) scales. Exploratory analysis also points to partial influence on the mediation hypothesis underlying the BIAS map and minor effects on its scale properties. Our evidence suggests that the difference between individual stereotypes and shared cultural stereotypes partially depends on the target group in question and that they should be treated as two potentially separate constructs. |
topic |
BIAS map Stereotype Content Model response instruction target group the Roma the Hungarians |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566725/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andrejfindor theimpactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap AT barbaralasticova theimpactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap AT matejhruska theimpactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap AT miroslavpopper theimpactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap AT lucavaradi theimpactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap AT lucavaradi theimpactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap AT andrejfindor impactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap AT barbaralasticova impactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap AT matejhruska impactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap AT miroslavpopper impactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap AT lucavaradi impactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap AT lucavaradi impactofresponseinstructionandtargetgrouponthebiasmap |
_version_ |
1724472453388828672 |