Alternative models for academic family practices

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Future of Family Medicine Report calls for a fundamental redesign of the American family physician workplace. At the same time, academic family practices are under economic pressure. Most family medicine departments do not have s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yarnall Kimberly SH, Krause Katrina M, Kaprielian Victoria S, Østbye Truls, Michener J, Yaggy Susan D, Gradison Margaret
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-03-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/38
id doaj-2e0dc101b17e45a4ba7a0ca52c4dbc0f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e0dc101b17e45a4ba7a0ca52c4dbc0f2020-11-25T00:37:54ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632006-03-01613810.1186/1472-6963-6-38Alternative models for academic family practicesYarnall Kimberly SHKrause Katrina MKaprielian Victoria SØstbye TrulsMichener JYaggy Susan DGradison Margaret<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Future of Family Medicine Report calls for a fundamental redesign of the American family physician workplace. At the same time, academic family practices are under economic pressure. Most family medicine departments do not have self-supporting practices, but seek support from specialty colleagues or hospital practice plans. Alternative models for academic family practices that are economically viable and consistent with the principles of family medicine are needed. This article presents several "experiments" to address these challenges.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The basis of comparison is a traditional academic family medicine center. Apart of the faculty practice plan, our center consistently operated at a deficit despite high productivity. A number of different practice types and alternative models of service delivery were therefore developed and tested. They ranged from a multi-specialty office arrangement, to a community clinic operated as part of a federally-qualified health center, to a team of providers based in and providing care for residents of an elderly public housing project. Financial comparisons using consistent accounting across models are provided.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Academic family practices can, at least in some settings, operate without subsidy while providing continuity of care to a broad segment of the community. The prerequisites are that the clinicians must see patients efficiently, and be able to bill appropriately for their payer mix.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Experimenting within academic practice structure and organization is worthwhile, and can result in economically viable alternatives to traditional models.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/38
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yarnall Kimberly SH
Krause Katrina M
Kaprielian Victoria S
Østbye Truls
Michener J
Yaggy Susan D
Gradison Margaret
spellingShingle Yarnall Kimberly SH
Krause Katrina M
Kaprielian Victoria S
Østbye Truls
Michener J
Yaggy Susan D
Gradison Margaret
Alternative models for academic family practices
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Yarnall Kimberly SH
Krause Katrina M
Kaprielian Victoria S
Østbye Truls
Michener J
Yaggy Susan D
Gradison Margaret
author_sort Yarnall Kimberly SH
title Alternative models for academic family practices
title_short Alternative models for academic family practices
title_full Alternative models for academic family practices
title_fullStr Alternative models for academic family practices
title_full_unstemmed Alternative models for academic family practices
title_sort alternative models for academic family practices
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2006-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Future of Family Medicine Report calls for a fundamental redesign of the American family physician workplace. At the same time, academic family practices are under economic pressure. Most family medicine departments do not have self-supporting practices, but seek support from specialty colleagues or hospital practice plans. Alternative models for academic family practices that are economically viable and consistent with the principles of family medicine are needed. This article presents several "experiments" to address these challenges.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The basis of comparison is a traditional academic family medicine center. Apart of the faculty practice plan, our center consistently operated at a deficit despite high productivity. A number of different practice types and alternative models of service delivery were therefore developed and tested. They ranged from a multi-specialty office arrangement, to a community clinic operated as part of a federally-qualified health center, to a team of providers based in and providing care for residents of an elderly public housing project. Financial comparisons using consistent accounting across models are provided.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Academic family practices can, at least in some settings, operate without subsidy while providing continuity of care to a broad segment of the community. The prerequisites are that the clinicians must see patients efficiently, and be able to bill appropriately for their payer mix.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Experimenting within academic practice structure and organization is worthwhile, and can result in economically viable alternatives to traditional models.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/38
work_keys_str_mv AT yarnallkimberlysh alternativemodelsforacademicfamilypractices
AT krausekatrinam alternativemodelsforacademicfamilypractices
AT kaprielianvictorias alternativemodelsforacademicfamilypractices
AT østbyetruls alternativemodelsforacademicfamilypractices
AT michenerj alternativemodelsforacademicfamilypractices
AT yaggysusand alternativemodelsforacademicfamilypractices
AT gradisonmargaret alternativemodelsforacademicfamilypractices
_version_ 1725299122065375232