Stillbirths at Term: Case Control Study of Risk Factors, Growth Status and Placental Histology.

OBJECTIVE:To investigate the proportion of stillbirths at term associated with abnormal growth using customized birth weight percentiles and to compare histological placental findings both in underweight stillborn fetuses and in live births. METHODS:A retrospective case-control study of 150 singleto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Federico Mecacci, Caterina Serena, Laura Avagliano, Mauro Cozzolino, Eleonora Baroni, Marianna Pina Rambaldi, Serena Simeone, Francesca Castiglione, Gian Luigi Taddei, Gaetano Bulfamante
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5147826?pdf=render
id doaj-2e09d7eb349942a2b44ec970ddcec9c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e09d7eb349942a2b44ec970ddcec9c12020-11-25T02:35:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-011112e016651410.1371/journal.pone.0166514Stillbirths at Term: Case Control Study of Risk Factors, Growth Status and Placental Histology.Federico MecacciCaterina SerenaLaura AvaglianoMauro CozzolinoEleonora BaroniMarianna Pina RambaldiSerena SimeoneFrancesca CastiglioneGian Luigi TaddeiGaetano BulfamanteOBJECTIVE:To investigate the proportion of stillbirths at term associated with abnormal growth using customized birth weight percentiles and to compare histological placental findings both in underweight stillborn fetuses and in live births. METHODS:A retrospective case-control study of 150 singleton term stillbirths. The livebirth control groups included 586 cases of low-risk pregnancies and 153 late fetal growth restriction fetuses. Stillbirths and livebirths from low-risk pregnancies were classified using customized standards for fetal weight at birth, as adequate for gestational age (AGA; 10-90th percentile), small (SGA; <10th percentile) or large for gestational age (LGA; >90th percentile). Placental characteristics in stillbirth were compared with those from livebirths using four categories: inflammation, disruptive, obstructive and adaptive lesions. RESULTS:There was a higher rate of SGA (26% vs 6%, p<0.001) and LGA fetuses (10.6% vs 5.6%, p<0.05) in the stillbirth group. Among stillbirth fetuses, almost half of the SGA were very low birthweight (≤3°percentile) (12% vs 0.3%, p<0.001). The disruptive (7.3% vs 0.17%;p<0.001), obstructive (54.6% vs 7.5%;p<0.001) and adaptive (46.6% vs 35.8%;p<0.001) findings were significantly more common in than in livebirth-low risk. Placental characteristics of AGA and SGA stillbirth were compared with those of AGA and FGR livebirth. In stillbirths-SGA we found a higher number of disruptive (12.8% vs 0%; p<0.001), obstructive (58.9% vs 23.5%;p<0.001) and adaptive lesions (56.4% vs 49%; p 0.47) than in livebirth-FGR. CONCLUSION:The assessment of fetal weight with customized curves can identify fetuses which have not reached their genetically determined growth potential and are therefore at risk for adverse outcomes. Placental evaluation in stillbirths can reveal chronic histological signs that might be useful to clinical assessment, especially in underweight fetuses.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5147826?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Federico Mecacci
Caterina Serena
Laura Avagliano
Mauro Cozzolino
Eleonora Baroni
Marianna Pina Rambaldi
Serena Simeone
Francesca Castiglione
Gian Luigi Taddei
Gaetano Bulfamante
spellingShingle Federico Mecacci
Caterina Serena
Laura Avagliano
Mauro Cozzolino
Eleonora Baroni
Marianna Pina Rambaldi
Serena Simeone
Francesca Castiglione
Gian Luigi Taddei
Gaetano Bulfamante
Stillbirths at Term: Case Control Study of Risk Factors, Growth Status and Placental Histology.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Federico Mecacci
Caterina Serena
Laura Avagliano
Mauro Cozzolino
Eleonora Baroni
Marianna Pina Rambaldi
Serena Simeone
Francesca Castiglione
Gian Luigi Taddei
Gaetano Bulfamante
author_sort Federico Mecacci
title Stillbirths at Term: Case Control Study of Risk Factors, Growth Status and Placental Histology.
title_short Stillbirths at Term: Case Control Study of Risk Factors, Growth Status and Placental Histology.
title_full Stillbirths at Term: Case Control Study of Risk Factors, Growth Status and Placental Histology.
title_fullStr Stillbirths at Term: Case Control Study of Risk Factors, Growth Status and Placental Histology.
title_full_unstemmed Stillbirths at Term: Case Control Study of Risk Factors, Growth Status and Placental Histology.
title_sort stillbirths at term: case control study of risk factors, growth status and placental histology.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description OBJECTIVE:To investigate the proportion of stillbirths at term associated with abnormal growth using customized birth weight percentiles and to compare histological placental findings both in underweight stillborn fetuses and in live births. METHODS:A retrospective case-control study of 150 singleton term stillbirths. The livebirth control groups included 586 cases of low-risk pregnancies and 153 late fetal growth restriction fetuses. Stillbirths and livebirths from low-risk pregnancies were classified using customized standards for fetal weight at birth, as adequate for gestational age (AGA; 10-90th percentile), small (SGA; <10th percentile) or large for gestational age (LGA; >90th percentile). Placental characteristics in stillbirth were compared with those from livebirths using four categories: inflammation, disruptive, obstructive and adaptive lesions. RESULTS:There was a higher rate of SGA (26% vs 6%, p<0.001) and LGA fetuses (10.6% vs 5.6%, p<0.05) in the stillbirth group. Among stillbirth fetuses, almost half of the SGA were very low birthweight (≤3°percentile) (12% vs 0.3%, p<0.001). The disruptive (7.3% vs 0.17%;p<0.001), obstructive (54.6% vs 7.5%;p<0.001) and adaptive (46.6% vs 35.8%;p<0.001) findings were significantly more common in than in livebirth-low risk. Placental characteristics of AGA and SGA stillbirth were compared with those of AGA and FGR livebirth. In stillbirths-SGA we found a higher number of disruptive (12.8% vs 0%; p<0.001), obstructive (58.9% vs 23.5%;p<0.001) and adaptive lesions (56.4% vs 49%; p 0.47) than in livebirth-FGR. CONCLUSION:The assessment of fetal weight with customized curves can identify fetuses which have not reached their genetically determined growth potential and are therefore at risk for adverse outcomes. Placental evaluation in stillbirths can reveal chronic histological signs that might be useful to clinical assessment, especially in underweight fetuses.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5147826?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT federicomecacci stillbirthsattermcasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsgrowthstatusandplacentalhistology
AT caterinaserena stillbirthsattermcasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsgrowthstatusandplacentalhistology
AT lauraavagliano stillbirthsattermcasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsgrowthstatusandplacentalhistology
AT maurocozzolino stillbirthsattermcasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsgrowthstatusandplacentalhistology
AT eleonorabaroni stillbirthsattermcasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsgrowthstatusandplacentalhistology
AT mariannapinarambaldi stillbirthsattermcasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsgrowthstatusandplacentalhistology
AT serenasimeone stillbirthsattermcasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsgrowthstatusandplacentalhistology
AT francescacastiglione stillbirthsattermcasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsgrowthstatusandplacentalhistology
AT gianluigitaddei stillbirthsattermcasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsgrowthstatusandplacentalhistology
AT gaetanobulfamante stillbirthsattermcasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsgrowthstatusandplacentalhistology
_version_ 1724804295516225536