Refuting Misconceptions: Computer Tutors for Fraction Arithmetic

Fractions, known to be difficult for both children and adults, are especially prone to misconceptions and erroneous strategy selection. The present study investigated whether a computer tutor improves fraction arithmetic performance in adults and if supplementing problem solving with erroneous examp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabrina M. Di Lonardo Burr, Heather Douglas, Maria Vorobeva, Kasia Muldner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Numerical Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jnc.psychopen.eu/index.php/jnc/article/view/310
id doaj-2e096535a5ac492c8df48a97ba11da03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e096535a5ac492c8df48a97ba11da032021-06-11T14:06:55ZengPsychOpenJournal of Numerical Cognition2363-87612020-12-016335537710.5964/jnc.v6i3.310jnc.v6i3.310Refuting Misconceptions: Computer Tutors for Fraction ArithmeticSabrina M. Di Lonardo Burr0Heather Douglas1Maria Vorobeva2Kasia Muldner3Department of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, CanadaDepartment of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, CanadaDepartment of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, CanadaDepartment of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, CanadaFractions, known to be difficult for both children and adults, are especially prone to misconceptions and erroneous strategy selection. The present study investigated whether a computer tutor improves fraction arithmetic performance in adults and if supplementing problem solving with erroneous examples is more beneficial than problem solving alone. Seventy-five undergraduates solved fraction arithmetic problems using a computer tutoring system we designed. In a between-subjects design, 39 participants worked with a problem-solving tutor that was supplemented with erroneous examples and 36 participants worked with a traditional problem-solving tutor. Both tutors provided hints and feedback. Overall, participants improved after the tutoring interventions, but there were no significant differences in gains made by the two conditions. For students with low prior knowledge about fraction arithmetic, the numerical gains were higher in the erroneous-example group than the problem-solving group, but this effect was not significant. Thus, computer tutors are useful tools for improving fraction knowledge. While erroneous examples may be particularly beneficial for students with low prior knowledge who may hold more misconceptions, more research is needed to make this conclusion.https://jnc.psychopen.eu/index.php/jnc/article/view/310fractionsfraction misconceptionseducational technologyexample-tracing tutor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sabrina M. Di Lonardo Burr
Heather Douglas
Maria Vorobeva
Kasia Muldner
spellingShingle Sabrina M. Di Lonardo Burr
Heather Douglas
Maria Vorobeva
Kasia Muldner
Refuting Misconceptions: Computer Tutors for Fraction Arithmetic
Journal of Numerical Cognition
fractions
fraction misconceptions
educational technology
example-tracing tutor
author_facet Sabrina M. Di Lonardo Burr
Heather Douglas
Maria Vorobeva
Kasia Muldner
author_sort Sabrina M. Di Lonardo Burr
title Refuting Misconceptions: Computer Tutors for Fraction Arithmetic
title_short Refuting Misconceptions: Computer Tutors for Fraction Arithmetic
title_full Refuting Misconceptions: Computer Tutors for Fraction Arithmetic
title_fullStr Refuting Misconceptions: Computer Tutors for Fraction Arithmetic
title_full_unstemmed Refuting Misconceptions: Computer Tutors for Fraction Arithmetic
title_sort refuting misconceptions: computer tutors for fraction arithmetic
publisher PsychOpen
series Journal of Numerical Cognition
issn 2363-8761
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Fractions, known to be difficult for both children and adults, are especially prone to misconceptions and erroneous strategy selection. The present study investigated whether a computer tutor improves fraction arithmetic performance in adults and if supplementing problem solving with erroneous examples is more beneficial than problem solving alone. Seventy-five undergraduates solved fraction arithmetic problems using a computer tutoring system we designed. In a between-subjects design, 39 participants worked with a problem-solving tutor that was supplemented with erroneous examples and 36 participants worked with a traditional problem-solving tutor. Both tutors provided hints and feedback. Overall, participants improved after the tutoring interventions, but there were no significant differences in gains made by the two conditions. For students with low prior knowledge about fraction arithmetic, the numerical gains were higher in the erroneous-example group than the problem-solving group, but this effect was not significant. Thus, computer tutors are useful tools for improving fraction knowledge. While erroneous examples may be particularly beneficial for students with low prior knowledge who may hold more misconceptions, more research is needed to make this conclusion.
topic fractions
fraction misconceptions
educational technology
example-tracing tutor
url https://jnc.psychopen.eu/index.php/jnc/article/view/310
work_keys_str_mv AT sabrinamdilonardoburr refutingmisconceptionscomputertutorsforfractionarithmetic
AT heatherdouglas refutingmisconceptionscomputertutorsforfractionarithmetic
AT mariavorobeva refutingmisconceptionscomputertutorsforfractionarithmetic
AT kasiamuldner refutingmisconceptionscomputertutorsforfractionarithmetic
_version_ 1714525544681308160